The Protective Effect of Physical Activity on Teachers' Psychological Well-Being: A Buffer Against Mental Workload and Stress
Published in Social Sciences, Public Health, and Behavioural Sciences & Psychology
The Protective Role of Physical Activity in the Psychological Health of Physical Education Teachers
Mental Workload and the Occupational Stress Cycle
The professional practice of physical education and sports teachers encompasses not only high physical demands but also complex cognitive and administrative responsibilities. Our study empirically demonstrates that an increased mental workload directly triggers occupational stress among teachers, functioning as a primary mechanism that undermines psychological well-being.
Research Model and the Buffering Effect
In this study, conducted with 450 physical education teachers across Turkey, the intricate relationship between mental workload, stress, and well-being was analyzed through a structural moderated mediation model. The findings prove that physical activity acts as a strategic "buffer" in this disruptive process. The research determined that teachers with high levels of physical activity are significantly more resilient to the adverse effects of occupational stress arising from mental workload.
A Critical Distinction: The "Physical Activity Paradox"
One of the most significant theoretical contributions of this research is its emphasis on contextual frameworks. For physical activity to function as a regenerative "resource" that prevents psychological exhaustion, it must cease to be a professional obligation. While physical activities based on autonomy, voluntariness, and leisure time support well-being, mandatory physical demands experienced as part of the workload can, in fact, exacerbate fatigue and stress.
Institutional Policy Implications
In light of these findings, merely reducing mental and administrative workloads is an insufficient approach to preserving the psychological resilience of teachers in educational institutions. It is a strategic necessity for school administrations to:
-
Establish institutional support mechanisms that encourage teachers' independent participation in physical activities.
-
Develop proactive programs specifically focused on stress management skills.
Follow the Topic
-
BMC Public Health
An open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Male reproductive health
BMC Public Health invites submissions to our new Collection, "Male reproductive health”. Male reproductive health is an essential yet often overlooked aspect of public health that encompasses various factors affecting men's fertility and overall well-being. Issues such as declining sperm counts, poor sperm quality, the impact of environmental exposures and the effects of lifestyle and dietary factors on reproductive outcomes are gaining increasing attention.
This Collection seeks to examine the multifaceted influences on male reproductive health, considering environmental, infectious and sociocultural dimensions that affect male reproductive parameters and contribute to fertility challenges. Continued research in this area could help identify causative factors and contribute to advances in public health policies, ultimately benefiting future generations.
Key topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
Environmental pollution and reproductive health
Sperm count trends and implications for fertility
The role of occupational exposures in male fertility
The effects of infectious diseases on sperm parameters
Impact of diet and lifestyle factors on sperm quality and fertility
Psychological factors influencing reproductive health
Interventions for improving male reproductive health
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to Sustainable Development Goal 3- Good Health and Well-Being.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Sep 29, 2026
Appropriate use of antibiotics: public health strategies, knowledge, and practice gaps
BMC Public Health is calling for submissions to our Collection on Appropriate use of antibiotics: public health strategies, knowledge, and practice gaps.
Misuse of antibiotics contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), posing a threat to the future management of bacterial diseases. However, it is a multi-faceted problem without a simple solution.
Antibiotic misuse can take various forms, each requiring different strategies to address. In healthcare systems, antibiotic overuse is often driven by the tension between clinical uncertainty and the desire to offer patients a treatment that may improve their symptoms or prevent them from developing complications. The prescription of antibiotics is often done empirically, driven by the difficulty of distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections at the point of care, or the worry that a lack of intervention could have consequences.
Added to this, people in the community can contribute to inappropriate use by reusing or sharing leftover antibiotics from prior prescriptions. Similarly, misplaced expectations around the benefits of antibiotics can drive misuse in the community, pointing to the need for community-focused and community-led initiatives to inform the public on the use of antibiotics and the collective impact of antimicrobial resistance.
However, social science reframes antibiotic overuse as more than an individual behaviour problem. Antibiotics frequently act as a social and structural “quick fix” that supports care, productivity, hygiene, and coping with inequality in everyday life. They are used to compensate for gaps in water, sanitation, social protection, and health-system capacity, suggesting that interventions focusing narrowly on individual knowledge and attitudes may be unlikely to succeed unless they also address these wider drivers.
This Collection aims to explore the various dimensions of the responsible use of antibiotics, examining the prevalence of misuse and strategies for reducing unnecessary use, covering interventions aimed at prescribers and pharmacists as well as 'bottom-up' strategies such as community education campaigns. We invite contributions that investigate the roles of healthcare providers, patients, professional guidance, communities, and policymakers in addressing this pressing issue.
Potential topics for submission include, but are not limited to:
Patterns of antibiotics overuse in various populations
The role of healthcare providers in preventing misuse
Public health campaigns and gross-roots initiatives to promote responsible use of antibiotics
Policy frameworks for improving the prescribing and dispensing of antibiotics
Social and structural drivers of antibiotic use (ethnographic, anthropological, and political-economy analyses).
Interventions that address upstream determinants (water, sanitation, social protection, labour conditions) alongside stewardship measures.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being).
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Oct 03, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in
I found this study very insightful, especially in how clearly it explains the relationship between mental workload and stress. What caught my attention most was the distinction between obligatory and voluntary physical activity, and how they do not always have the same positive effects. This perspective feels very realistic and closely connected to everyday life. Beyond its academic contribution, the study also helps us better understand the challenges teachers face in their daily routines. I truly appreciated reading this work thank you for your valuable contribution.
Thank you very much for your kind feedback. I’m glad you found the study meaningful. I truly appreciate your interest and comments.
I read your study with great interest and found it quite thought-provoking. The way the relationship between mental workload and stress is presented helped me better understand the topic. The distinction between obligatory and voluntary physical activity highlights an important point that is often overlooked in daily life. Additionally, the study offers a different perspective on the challenges faced by teachers. Thank you for this valuable contribution.
Thank you very much for your kind and thoughtful comment. I’m glad you found the study meaningful. I truly appreciate your feedback.
This study presents a clear and well-structured overview of the relationship between mental workload and stress. It is particularly noteworthy for its connection to real-life conditions in educational settings. The distinction between types of physical activity adds a new dimension to the topic. Overall, it is a valuable study that encourages reflection on teachers’ well-being. Thank you for your effort.
Thank you very much for your thoughtful comment and positive feedback. I truly appreciate you taking the time to read and review my work.