World Health Day 2025: Q&A with Prof Andrew Williams

To celebrate World Health Day 2025, we speak with Prof Andrew Williams, Associate Editor for Reproductive Health, on his research on reducing inequalities in maternal and child health.

Published in Social Sciences and Public Health

World Health Day 2025: Q&A with Prof Andrew Williams
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Andrew D. Williams, PhD MPH, is an assistant professor in the Department of Population Health at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine & Health Sciences and Associate Editor for Reproductive Health. Dr. Williams is a perinatal epidemiologist with an interest in structural inequalities and obstetric and pediatric health outcomes with consequences across the life span. Currently he is leading the Stress and Health in American Indian Pregnancies study, investigating associations between Adverse Childhood Experiences, historic trauma, stress, and infant growth among American Indian women in North Dakota. Dr. Williams was recently awarded an NIH Loan Repayment Program for Health Disparities Research award for his work investigating telehealth use and pregnancy outcomes in North Dakota. As Executive Director of the North and South Dakota Perinatal Quality Collaborative, Dr. Williams has secured over $2 million from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Health Resources and Services Administration to implement quality improvement projects at prenatal care sites in the region.  

How does your research relate to the SDGs?

My research directly addresses SDG 10's focus on reducing inequality, particularly through my work examining health disparities in maternal and child health. My studies on ethnic enclaves and pregnancy outcomes among Asian/Pacific Islander women, racial residential segregation and stillbirth disparities, and the impact of environmental factors on gestational diabetes all highlight how social determinants affect health inequitably. My current work with the "Stress and Health in American Indian Pregnancies (SHAIP) Study" specifically targets health inequities faced by American Indian women in North Dakota, examining how adverse childhood experiences affect maternal and infant outcomes in this historically marginalized population.

Why did you decide to go into your field of research?

My career path reveals a consistent commitment to addressing health disparities. Beginning with my work at the North Dakota Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Center and research in the Republic of Congo on prenatal alcohol exposure, I've consistently focused on vulnerable populations. My transition to studying broader determinants of maternal health outcomes reflects my recognition that addressing upstream social and environmental factors is essential for meaningful change. The geographic progression of my work—from international settings to rural American populations—demonstrates my commitment to applying epidemiological methods to understand and address health inequities across diverse contexts.

How has the knowledge of maternal health developed over the course of your career?

The evolution of my research publications shows how maternal health knowledge has expanded from individual risk factors to a more complex understanding of multilevel influences. My early work focused on specific exposures like prenatal alcohol, but has expanded to incorporate environmental pollutants, neighborhood characteristics, racial segregation, and psychosocial factors like stress and adverse childhood experiences. My recent publications examining telehealth access, COVID-19 impacts, and interpersonal violence demonstrate how the field increasingly recognizes the intersection of social, environmental, and healthcare system factors in maternal health outcomes.

What challenges do vulnerable populations in particular face?

    My research highlights several key challenges facing vulnerable populations:

    1. Disparities in healthcare access: My work on early prenatal care barriers among American Indian women in North Dakota reveals significant obstacles.
    2. Historical trauma: My current SHAIP study examines how adverse childhood experiences and historical trauma affect pregnancy outcomes in American Indian women.
    3. Systemic barriers: My work with the North Dakota Perinatal Quality Collaborative addresses systemic issues in rural healthcare delivery, including urban-rural disparities in interpersonal violence screening.
    4. Limited representation: My publications on ethnic enclaves highlight how cultural isolation and marginalization affect health outcomes.

    What are your hopes for progress in the future?

    My current grant activities and research trajectory suggest several aspirations for future progress:

    1. Strengthening rural healthcare systems: My leadership of the North Dakota Perinatal Quality Collaborative demonstrates commitment to improving maternal healthcare in underserved rural areas.
    2. Cultural responsiveness: My focus on American Indian maternal health indicates dedication to culturally appropriate interventions that respect indigenous knowledge.
    3. Multi-level interventions: My research increasingly examines both individual and structural factors, suggesting a commitment to comprehensive approaches.
    4. Data-driven policy: My work producing reports on American Indian women and children for the North Dakota Department of Health shows commitment to translating research into policy action.

    Throughout my career, I've maintained focus on using epidemiological methods to illuminate and address health disparities, particularly those affecting maternal and child health in vulnerable populations. This work directly supports SDG 10's aim of reducing inequalities and ensuring no one is left behind.


    World Health Day, celebrated on 7 April each year, aims to promote wellbeing and health. Organised by the World Health Organisation, the 2025 campaign, titled "Healthy beginnings, hopeful futures", will urge governments and the health community to ramp up efforts to end preventable maternal and newborn deaths, and to prioritise women’s longer-term health and wellbeing, supporting Sustainable Development Goal 3

    For more content on World Health Day 2025, please check out our research highlights blog here.

    Please sign in or register for FREE

    If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

    Follow the Topic

    Public Health
    Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health
    Maternal and Child Health
    Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health > Health Promotion and Disease Prevention > Maternal and Child Health
    Social Inequality
    Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Social Structure > Social Inequality
    Health Policy
    Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Health, Medicine and Society > Health Policy

    Related Collections

    With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

    Comprehensive Sexuality Education

    Comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) is defined by the WHO as giving ‘young people accurate, age-appropriate information about sexuality and their sexual and reproductive health, which is critical for their health and survival’. CSE is a crucial component of public health programs and aims to equip individuals with the knowledge needed to make informed decisions on their sexual health. Numerous studies have demonstrated that CSE programs reduce the rates of sexual activity, sexual risk behaviours such as number of partners and unprotected intercourse, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and adolescent pregnancy. Current programs across the world vary in their content, effectiveness, and emphasis and despite significant progress in recent years, challenges remain, including high rates of STIs and adolescent pregnancy. Collection objectives: - Assess the current landscape of CSE programs, including effectiveness and impact. - Examine patterns of risky sexual behaviours amongst populations and identify contributing factors. - Explore potential interventions and strategies to enhance the delivery and effectiveness of sexuality education programs to mitigate negative outcomes. Topics of interest include: - The effectiveness of CSE programs. - Harm reduction approaches to sex and sexuality education, and risky sexual behaviours, including chemsex. - The role of healthcare providers, schools, parents, community organisations, social media and influencers in promoting good sexual health. - Innovative interventions, such as telemedicine, mobile health apps, and community-based programs, to promote sexual health. - How economic disparities impact individuals' access to quality sexual health information and resources, leading to inequities in health outcomes. - Disparities in education based on location, gender, race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. - The consequences of cultural differences within countries and globally on the approach to CSE and the associated health outcomes. - The impact on CSE delivery of biological changes, such as the shift in age of puberty, and technical evolutions, such as chemical prevention (PreP) in relation to HIV and sex behaviour. - Explore the level and appropriateness of research into CSE, and the barriers to ensuring that policy and practice in this area is driven by the research.

    Publishing Model: Open Access

    Deadline: Ongoing

    Innovations in Addressing Unsafe Abortions in LMICs

    Unsafe abortion is a major health problem of public health importance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is a leading cause of maternal mortality, and is often performed by unskilled people without medical training and in unsafe environments. Unsafe abortion estimates by the World Health Organization (WHO) have shown that about 25 million unsafe abortions occur each year, with about 7% of unsafe abortions occurring in LMICs thereby making Unsafe abortion among the top five causes of maternal mortality in LMICs.

    This collection is focused on innovative strategies to reduce unsafe abortions and improve post-abortion care in LMICs where the incidence of Unsafe abortion has significantly impacted on the reproductive wellbeing of abortion seekers with women mostly affected. This public health crisis is driven by restrictive laws, stigma, limited access to healthcare services and trained providers that collectively results in unsafe abortion related complications include hemorrhage, infection, uterine perforation, among others.

    Key areas of focus in this journal include technological advancements like telemedicine and self-managed medication abortion, policy innovations such as legal reforms and task-shifting to mid-level providers, and education and advocacy efforts to combat misinformation and stigma. Special focus is given to adolescents and marginalized populations facing the highest barriers. By highlighting evidence-based solutions, this collection aims to inform policies and programme interventions that will enhance reproductive health and rights in LMICs.

    All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here).

    We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or contact the Editor-in-Chief.

    This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 10, Reduced Inequality.

    Publishing Model: Open Access

    Deadline: Nov 26, 2025