Digital literacy and post truth challenges in the rural academic ecosystem of Tamil Nadu

how digital technologies interact with “post-truth” dynamics within rural higher education in Tamil Nadu, India. Aims to understand how students, faculty use digital tools, their perceptions of truth & misinformation in academic contexts, what challenges & opportunities arise in digital pedagogy. 
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Digital literacy and post truth challenges in the rural academic ecosystem of Tamil Nadu - Discover Education

This mixed-methods study looks at how post-truth dynamics and digital technologies interact in Tamil Nadu, India’s rural higher education system. Using a primary survey (n = 284; 240 students, 44 faculty), six focus groups (n = 38) and content analysis of institutional digital resources, the study explores perceptions of truth and misinformation, technology use patterns, opportunities and challenges in digital pedagogy and mitigation suggestions from stakeholders. The findings show that 85% of students use smartphones for learning and that access to computers and institutional smart classrooms is not uniform. Just 20% of respondents said they regularly checked information before using it and 60% said they had come across academic content that was inaccurate or unconfirmed. Although gaps in fact-checking techniques remained, 80% of participants in a supplemental certificate-course cohort (n = 81) indicated an improvement in their digital confidence following organized training. Research indicates that although technology increases access and pedagogical alternatives, when infrastructure and curriculum integration are lacking, it is also associated with increased circulation of emotionally charged and unsubstantiated material in institutional channels. The findings are correlational in nature and purposefully restricted to rural Tamil Nadu; the policy suggestions made are contextually sensitive and meant to be workable institutional solutions, such as focused digital literacy training, fact-checking procedures for shared materials and Tamil-language materials. The study offers a fact-based explanation of how, in a particular rural academic setting, technology adoption and the post-truth world coexist.

The article investigates how digital technologies interact with “post-truth” dynamics (where subjective belief can outweigh verifiable fact) within rural higher education in Tamil Nadu, India. It aims to understand how students and faculty use digital tools, their perceptions of truth and misinformation in academic contexts, and what challenges and opportunities arise in digital pedagogy.

Research Design:
The study follows a mixed-methods approach, combining:
• A survey of 284 participants (240 students and 44 faculty) from multiple rural and semi-urban colleges.
Six focus group discussions to gather deeper qualitative insights.
Content analysis of institutional digital resources (such as learning management systems, WhatsApp academic groups, and YouTube lectures).

Key Findings:
High usage of smartphones for learning: 85 % of students reported using smartphones for academic activity, but access to computers and smart classrooms was unequal.
Low verification of information: Only 20 % of respondents routinely checked information before using it academically, while a majority (60 %) encountered inaccurate or unverified academic content.
Digital confidence can improve with training: Participants in a supplementary digital literacy certificate course showed improved confidence in using digital tools, although verification skills remained a challenge.
Technology both helps and complicates learning: While digital tools increase access to content and pedagogical options, lack of infrastructure, training, and curriculum integration can exacerbate the spread of unsubstantiated material and post-truth effects in academic settings.

Conclusions and Implications:
The article concludes that digital literacy is critically needed in rural academic ecosystems to mitigate the risks of misinformation and “post-truth” influences. It recommends institutional supports, such as structured digital literacy training, fact-checking procedures, and localized digital curriculum strategies, to strengthen the quality and credibility of academic engagement with digital tools.

Why This Research Matters:
• The study provides empirical data from rural India, a context that is underrepresented in digital literacy research.
• It bridges education, media studies, and technology use, offering insights of broad interdisciplinary relevance.
• Its findings can inform policy, faculty development and curriculum design in similar rural higher education settings globally.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Media Education
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Media Education
Alternative Education
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Alternative Education
Cultural Policy and Politics
Humanities and Social Sciences > Cultural Studies > Cultural Policy and Politics
Digital and New Media
Humanities and Social Sciences > Media and Communication > Digital and New Media
Research Data
Research Communities > Community > Research Data

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Empowering Education through AI: Opportunities, Challenges and Risk Governance

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the landscape of education as a double-edged sword. On one hand, it holds great promise for empowering teaching, learning, assessment, and educational management by making them more efficient, accurate, adaptive, and responsive. On the other hand, the increasing integration of AI in education elicits significant pedagogical, ethical, social, and policy concerns, such as reduced learner agency, algorithmic control, academic misconduct, and exacerbated educational disparities. Without proper risk governance, the AI technologies intended to empower education may end up disrupting the educational processes and wreaking chaos on educational development. This calls for coordinated efforts from policymakers, researchers, and practitioners worldwide to ensure the legitimate, appropriate, responsible, and ethical use of AI in education.

Against this backdrop, this Collection aims to promote critical inquiry into the intricate and multifaceted features of AI use in education. We particularly welcome interdisciplinary perspectives that explicate how policymakers, researchers, educators, and learners can participate in and collaborate to leverage the transformative power of AI while mitigating the potential risks within different educational scenarios and across diversified cultural contexts. Potential topics include (but are not limited to):

1. Social, ethical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioural terrains of AI use in education

2. Human-AI collaboration in teaching, learning, assessment, and educational management

3. Learner agency, self-regulation, and AI-empowered learning

4. Teacher professional development in AI-empowered education

5. AI literacy for educators and learners

6. Educational equity and academic integrity in the AI era

7. Policy innovation and risk governance for AI use in various educational settings

8. Cross-cultural perspectives on AI use and governance in education

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 4

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI); Human-AI collaboration; AI-empowered education; policy innovation; risk governance; educational equity; academic integrity

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Feb 26, 2026

Empowering Education: Interdisciplinary Convergence and Skill Ecosystem Reconstruction for a Sustainable Future

In an era of unprecedented environmental and societal challenges, education systems must transform to empower students as catalysts for sustainable futures. This Collection advances sustainability education beyond environmental awareness, focusing on developing critical competencies—systems thinking, ethical decision-making, and innovative problem-solving—essential for building resilient societies.

We call for systemic reimagining of education across all levels and disciplines, particularly highlighting:

• Cross-curricular integration of sustainability principles in STEM and vocational training

• Pedagogical innovations that bridge theory-practice gaps

• Industry-education synergies for green skills development

• Digital transformation of sustainability learning

Key Research Domains

Contributions should address critical intersections of sustainability and education, including but not limited to:

• Curriculum innovation for actionable sustainability knowledge

• Evidence-based pedagogical strategies fostering sustainability literacy

• Vocational education redesign for green economy readiness

• Industry partnerships enhancing real-world learning

• Digital technologies (AI, data analytics) in sustainability education

• Assessment frameworks for sustainability competencies

• Teacher professional development models

• Global citizenship and ethical responsibility cultivation

Transformative Objectives

By examining how curricula, teaching strategies, and learning environments can embed sustainability principles, this Special Issue aims to:

• Equip learners with values-driven leadership capabilities

• Develop scalable solutions for environmental, social, and economic challenges

• Catalyze education’s role in achieving global sustainability goals

We invite submissions offering actionable insights and transformative frameworks to prepare students for thriving in a rapidly evolving world.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: May 31, 2026