Some considerations on digital health validation

Adoption of digital health technologies is hindered by lack of robust systems for validation. We respond to feedback on our previous framework article in this reply.

Published in Healthcare & Nursing

Some considerations on digital health validation
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

The motivation for designing a validation framework for digital health was inspired by the real world challenge of not being able to reliably give patients and colleagues recommendations for which health technologies to use. This limitation is due to difficulty in identifying quality in a crowded marketplace of solutions. In traditional clinical medicine, there are generally agreed upon conventions on what constitutes high quality evidence which are used to discriminate traditional devices and therapies. This clarity is what ultimately changes clinical practice. In the world of consumer goods there are also number of trusted entities that help convey quality through rigorous testing. Digital health represents an overlap of these two worlds where products are marketed directly to patients and physicians with clinical intent, but unfortunately without any meaningful oversight. Our approach was to develop a pragmatic and transparent scorecard to evaluate health technology to help all stakeholders in medicine identify the solutions that can make a difference. We designed our framework of evaluation along four principal domains: clinical validation; technical validation; usability; and cost. In addition, an evaluation of whether the technology satisfied its end user's functional requirements was also included. 

Our initial framework generated significant interest from different stakeholder groups. We welcomed the feedback and in this edition of npj Digital Medicine we respond to several points raised. Notably, we emphasize the flexibility of our approach to different technology types and suggest a stakeholder centric approach to adoption. We also acknowledge the importance of learning from the experience of low and middle income countries as well as the need to demonstrate tangible value which is currently underway. Ultimately, digital health needs improved validation to facilitate widespread adoption. We believe our framework is one practical approach to meeting this goal and look forward to sharing the results of our pilot study in the future.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Health Care
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Health Care
  • npj Digital Medicine npj Digital Medicine

    An online open-access journal dedicated to publishing research in all aspects of digital medicine, including the clinical application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies, virtual healthcare, and novel applications of artificial intelligence and informatics.

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Artificial Intelligence in Emergency and Critical Care Medicine

This Collection focuses on the unique challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence (AI) applications in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU), environments where rapid decision-making and precision are critical to patient survival. These settings are characterized by their fast pace, high patient turnover, unpredictable workloads, and the need to manage acute and life-threatening conditions.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jan 10, 2026

Evaluating the Real-World Clinical Performance of AI

This Collection invites research on exploring how AI performs in real-world clinical settings, focusing on utility, safety, equity, and impact on healthcare.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jun 03, 2026