Sociological impacts of energy management at Tema Oil Refinery. Discover Environment

This study explores how social factors like age, gender, education, and work experience influence how employees at Tema Oil Refinery (TOR) in Ghana perceive and respond to energy management practices.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Sociological Impacts of Energy Management at Tema Oil Refine

This study explores how social factors like age, gender, education, and work experience influence how employees at Tema Oil Refinery (TOR) in Ghana perceive and respond to energy management practices. While most energy research focuses on technology or cost, this study highlights the human and sociological side of energy efficiency—showing that people’s backgrounds shape how they engage with environmental efforts.

Why Energy Management Matters

Energy Management Systems (EMS) help companies like TOR monitor and reduce energy use to lower costs and reduce pollution. These systems are especially important in large industries that consume high amounts of energy and release pollutants. With global attention on climate change and sustainability, EMS plays a crucial role in meeting international goals like those in the Paris Agreement. However, for such systems to work well, employees need to understand, support, and participate in them.

How the Study Was Done

The research used a mixed-methods approach, combining both quantitative (numbers) and qualitative (opinions) data. Fifty staff members from five key departments at TOR were surveyed using a structured questionnaire. Questions focused on their views about pollution control, energy-saving strategies, and their own participation in these processes. Demographic details such as gender, age, education, and job experience were also collected.

Key Findings

  1. Gender Differences

Men and women view TOR’s energy strategies differently. Women tended to rate the refinery’s pollution control efforts more critically. This may indicate that environmental communication and engagement strategies at TOR do not equally reach all groups. Including more diverse perspectives in planning and evaluation can lead to more effective policies.

  1. Age and Experience

Younger workers generally had a more positive view of TOR’s energy initiatives than older ones. Similarly, those with less work experience were more optimistic. Long-term employees were more skeptical, possibly due to past experiences with unfulfilled initiatives. This highlights the importance of regular engagement with experienced staff, whose insights can be valuable for long-term improvement.

  1. Education Levels

Education made a significant difference. Employees with higher education—especially those with master’s degrees—were more critical of TOR’s strategies. Their expectations for strong environmental policies were higher, showing that technical knowledge increases scrutiny. TOR needs to adjust its communication and training efforts based on employees’ educational backgrounds to ensure broader support.

Views on Environmental Strategies

Employees were asked to assess various pollution control strategies. The results were mixed:

  • Measures to address soil and water pollution were seen as somewhat effective.
  • Air pollution strategies received lower ratings, signaling a need for better controls.
  • Many respondents were undecided, suggesting a communication gap about what actions TOR is taking.

Insights Across Groups

  • Men rated TOR’s efforts more positively than women, who remained more skeptical.
  • Younger workers expressed lower confidence in pollution control strategies than older workers.
  • Higher-educated employees were more likely to question TOR’s practices, showing a need for stronger accountability.

These differences show that energy strategies are not “one-size-fits-all.” People’s backgrounds affect how they view company efforts and whether they participate fully in energy-saving practices.

Recommendations

The study offers several ways TOR—and other similar companies—can improve employee engagement and the success of energy strategies:

  1. Gender-Inclusive Communication: Policies should be communicated in ways that consider gender-specific concerns and experiences.
  2. Age-Specific Training: Younger and older employees may require different approaches to understand and support energy initiatives.
  3. Experience-Based Engagement: Involving long-term employees in decision-making helps tap into institutional knowledge and rebuild trust.
  4. Education-Sensitive Materials: Tailoring materials to different education levels can improve understanding and buy-in.
  5. Clear Feedback Channels: Regular updates on progress and open channels for employee input help build ownership and accountability.

Conclusion

This study shows that effective energy management depends not just on technology, but on people. Gender, age, education, and job experience all influence how employees at TOR understand and engage with energy policies. If management recognizes these differences and adapts strategies accordingly, energy initiatives are more likely to succeed.

TOR and industries like it must treat their workers not just as users of energy systems, but as active participants. By combining strong technical measures with inclusive, people-centered approaches, companies can achieve better energy efficiency, lower environmental impact, and greater workplace engagement.

 

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Sustainability
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability
Energy Management
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences > Energy Policy, Economics and Management > Energy Management

What are SDG Topics?

An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.

Continue reading announcement

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Monitoring environmental pollution and impact on health

The intensification of human activities and the expansion and densification of urban areas cause various damages to the environment, necessitating continuous monitoring to assess the impact and extent of potential risks to both the environment and human health, in order to ensure urban sustainability.

This collection, “Monitoring Environmental Pollution and Impact on Health,” invites contributions that utilize tools related to health impact assessment, human health risk, ecological risk, data modeling, geospatial data, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to analyze impacts within urban environments. We also encourage the publication of research on the dynamics of pollution and health in rural and peri-urban areas, interdisciplinary studies between environmental sciences and public health, epidemiology, and urban planning for a holistic assessment of the multifaceted impacts of pollution on human well-being. In addition, studies that contribute actionable policy recommendations for local governments, environmental agencies, or public health institutions dealing with urban pollution are welcome. Research (time series or longitudinal studies) that demonstrate public health trends related to chronic exposure to pollutants, aiming for a better understanding of long-term urban sustainability issues, are also encouraged. Studies addressing health risks for vulnerable populations (such as children, the elderly, or low-income communities) exposed to environmental pollution in densely populated areas are of particular interest. We welcome studies on participatory monitoring and the development of citizen science, empowering communities to act in collaboration with local environmental health surveillance managers. Research involving satellite pollution monitoring and remote sensing is also encouraged. Comparative studies on pollution and health across different regions, identifying critical hotspots and globally replicable mitigation strategies, are of interest. We also welcome research that investigates environmental justice and urban socio-demographic inequalities/disparities in health due to environmental pollution. Review studies and meta-analyses exploring trends, methodologies, and gaps in urban environmental health research are also welcome.

Keywords: Health impact assessment, Environmental quality monitoring (air, water, and soil), Pollution sources and emissions, Spatial analysis, Geospatial technology, Climate change, Urban sustainability, Machine learning, Ecological risk assessment, Human health risk assessment

This Collection supports and amplifies research aligned with the following Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): SDG 11.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Feb 28, 2027

Environmental and Health Risk Assessment from Exposure to Xenobiotics

This collection brings together original research articles, case studies, and critical reviews that provide a comprehensive analysis of environmental and human health risks arising from exposure to xenobiotics, defined as chemical substances foreign to biological systems that may cause adverse effects on organisms and ecosystems. This collection aims to consolidate scientific contributions addressing the identification, characterization, quantification, and management of risk associated with chemical contaminants of industrial, agricultural, pharmaceutical, and domestic origin, including pesticides, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, endocrine disruptors, emerging pharmaceuticals, and other persistent compounds. Interest is given to studies employing multidisciplinary approaches, including environmental toxicology, analytical chemistry, epidemiology, ecotoxicology, exposure modeling, environmental impact assessment, and public health policy analysis. The collection seeks to advance scientific knowledge and evidence-based decision-making by promoting prevention, mitigation, and control strategies that protect human health and sustain ecosystems amid the increasing presence of xenobiotics in the environment.

This Collection is strategically positioned to advance the next generation of integrated environmental–human health risk assessment frameworks addressing xenobiotics under real-world conditions. Rather than treating environmental contamination, toxicological endpoints, and epidemiological outcomes as isolated domains, the Collection explicitly promotes a systems-based approach that connects analytical detection, exposure pathways, dose–response relationships, and risk management within a unified, policy-relevant continuum.

We particularly encourage submissions that bridge high-resolution chemical analysis, exposure modeling, and measurable health outcomes, thereby strengthening causal interpretation and reducing fragmentation between chemistry-focused and public health contributions. Methodological advances in cumulative risk assessment, mixture toxicology, and low-dose chronic exposure evaluation are strongly welcomed, reflecting the complex multi-chemical realities faced by populations and ecosystems worldwide.

The Collection explicitly invites research on emerging contaminants, including pharmaceuticals, microplastics-associated chemicals, transformation products, endocrine disruptors, and persistent pollutants, ensuring alignment with evolving regulatory priorities and environmental challenges. Comparative and longitudinal studies across regions, ecosystems, and vulnerable populations are encouraged to generate generalizable insights into transboundary pollution, food-chain transfer, and socio-environmental exposure dynamics.

To enhance coherence and scientific impact, contributions will be structured along the risk assessment continuum: hazard identification, exposure assessment, dose–response analysis, and risk management translation. Special emphasis will be placed on studies that move beyond risk characterization toward actionable outputs, including regulatory threshold development, mitigation strategies, and public health interventions applicable in both developed and developing contexts.

By fostering interdisciplinary collaboration among analytical chemists, toxicologists, exposure scientists, epidemiologists, environmental modelers, and social scientists working on risk perception and communication, this Collection aims to position Discover Environment as a leading platform for integrative, policy-relevant, and globally impactful environmental health research.

Keywords: Xenobiotics, Environmental Risk Assessment, Health Risk Assessment, Chemical pollution, Toxicological exposure, Ecotoxicology, Integrated Risk Assessment, Cumulative and Mixture Toxicity, Exposure Pathways, Emerging Contaminants, Risk Management, Policy Translation, Transboundary Pollution

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 31, 2026