BOLD Blog in Brief

Research does little to improve outcomes for students and teachers if the findings are misunderstood or incorrectly applied. Two BOLD Blog authors explore ways to strengthen the link between research and classroom implementation.

Published in Neuroscience

BOLD Blog in Brief
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

David Yeager identifies a cycle in which an educational innovation presented as “the latest thing” becomes a fad that teachers easily dismiss as impractical or ineffective. He suggests that researchers look at where ideas work, as well as where they don’t. In this way, researchers and educators can work in tandem to discover the nuances of how to implement new ideas. Read more here.  

Similarly, Jessica Massonnié seeks ways to help teachers and others to distinguish between evidence-based learning strategies and intractable neuromyths (disproven educational assertions) that lodge in classroom practice. She suggests not only debunking neuromyths and communicating the limitations of research studies, but also disseminating strategies that do work. She points out web-based resources that make scientific research easily accessible and understandable to students, parents, and educators. Read more here

Photo: Erich Ferdinand, flickr.com, CC BY 2.0

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in