Embracing Multiple Ways of Knowing for Coastal and Fisheries Management

The weaving of diverse knowledge systems is an increasingly adopted approach in scientific research. Despite documented successes, skepticism among scientists and decision-makers persists, leaving unaddressed gaps.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Read the paper

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

The gifts of multiple perspectives: a Two-Eyed Seeing approach to Gumegwsis (Cyclopterus lumpus) ecology in inner Mawipoqtapei (Chaleur Bay), Eastern Canada - Environmental Biology of Fishes

The weaving of diverse knowledge systems, including Indigenous, Local, and Western Knowledge, is an increasingly adopted approach in scientific research and is perceived as a promising path towards advancing knowledge and management of coastal areas and fisheries management in Canada. Despite documented successes, skepticism among scientists and decision-makers persists, leaving unaddressed gaps. Here, in response to concerns voiced by fishers from the Mi’gmaw community of Ugpi’ganjiq, the Gespe’gewa’gi Institute of Natural Understanding (GINU) co-created a project to improve understanding of the ecology and state of the threatened Gumegwsis (i.e. Cyclopterus lumpus, common lumpfish) in inner Mawipoqtapei (Chaleur Bay, Eastern Canada). Through a Two-Eyed Seeing approach, we combined semi-structured interviews with five Knowledge Holders with a literature review, mapping, and temperature monitoring. Utilizing this Mi’gmaw framework, we learned about Gumegwsis life history in inner Mawipoqtapei, its significance to local fishers, changes in abundance over time, threats to the species, and identified potential areas for spawning and nursery habitats. Prior to our project, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) assessment asserted “There are no indications of any ceremonial uses of Lumpfish in Canada and there is no ATK (Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge) information available”. In contrast, our study reveals the distinctive relationship and comprehension of Gumegwsis held by Mi’gmaw fishers, underscoring the significance of embracing multiple ways of knowing towards understanding species ecology, and presenting a compelling case for co-creation of species recovery strategies and collaboration in fisheries research.

Bridging Knowledge Systems to Enhance Understanding of the Gumegwsis

In the picturesque waters of inner Mawipoqtapei (Chaleur Bay, Eastern Canada), a collaborative research initiative is reshaping how we approach scientific inquiry and fisheries management. Led by the Gespe’gewa’gi Institute of Natural Understanding (GINU), this groundbreaking project centres on the threatened Gumegwsis (Cyclopterus lumpus, commonly known as the lumpfish). This initiative stands out by employing the Two-Eyed Seeing approach, an innovative framework that braids Indigenous, Local, and Western knowledge systems.

The project began in response to concerns from the Mi’gmaw community of Ugpi’ganjiq, who noticed changes in the Gumegwsis population. Historically, the Gumegwsis has not only been a crucial part of the local ecology but also holds significant cultural value for the community. Contrary to the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) assessment, which previously noted no ceremonial uses of Lumpfish and a lack of Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge (ATK) information, our findings paint a different picture.

Through a series of semi-structured interviews with five esteemed Knowledge Holders from the community, complemented by extensive literature reviews, mapping exercises, and temperature monitoring, our team has gathered profound insights into the life history of Gumegwsis in Mawipoqtapei. We documented vital information about their spawning and nursery habitats, significant changes in their abundance over time, and identified threats to their survival.

These insights not only challenge existing assessments but also highlight the critical gaps in our understanding when traditional scientific approaches are employed in isolation. The Mi’gmaw framework, which underpins our methodology, has proven instrumental in bridging these gaps, offering a richer, more comprehensive understanding of Gumegwsis ecology.

The skepticism that often surrounds the integration of diverse knowledge systems in scientific research persists among some scientists and decision-makers. However, our project demonstrates the undeniable value of such braiding. By combining different ways of knowing, we not only enrich our understanding but also foster more inclusive, effective management and conservation strategies.

As we move forward, the importance of co-creating knowledge with Indigenous communities cannot be overstated. The success of the Gumegwsis project serves as a testament to the potential of collaborative research in addressing complex ecological issues. It presents a compelling case for the necessity of incorporating multiple knowledge systems in the co-creation of species recovery strategies and in broader fisheries research.

This initiative is a clarion call to researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders in fisheries management across Canada and beyond to embrace a more holistic approach in their practices. By doing so, we can ensure that the management and protection of fisheries are as comprehensive and effective as possible, honouring both the scientific and cultural dimensions of biodiversity.

Stay tuned for further updates as we continue to explore and advocate for the integration of Indigenous, Local, and Western knowledge in advancing the stewardship of coastal areas and fisheries. Join us in championing a more inclusive and effective approach to environmental research and management.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Indigenous Education
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Sociology of Education > Indigenous Education
Earth Sciences
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Earth Sciences
Moral Philosophy and Applied Ethics
Humanities and Social Sciences > Philosophy > Moral Philosophy and Applied Ethics