Empowering local voices in shaping land use decisions

Many international as well as grassroots initiatives call for a wider and deeper engagement of local communities not only in managing their present but even in shaping the future of the environment they live in and sometimes highly rely on.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Near and far future conservation, land use, and land cover interactions around the wider Etosha landscape, north-central Namibia - Regional Environmental Change

Recent conservation efforts have resulted in the growth of protected and conserved areas as a land use across African drylands. However, land use and land cover change (LULCC) associated with habitat fragmentation continues to be a substantive driver of biodiversity loss in multiple-use landscapes. This study highlights the significance of perspectives from diverse stakeholders in understanding LULCC in a southern African dryland where the coverage of protected and conserved areas is increasing. The study models future land cover change scenarios and assesses their alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Agenda 2030 and the African Union (AU) Agenda 2063. Three scenarios representing business-as-usual conditions, conservation and livestock production, and agricultural and livestock production are outlined. Under business-as-usual conditions, protected areas are conserved and built-up areas expand. However, land degradation occurs where people are concentrated around key resource areas. In a scenario focused on conservation and livestock production, conservation initiatives are strengthened, but expansion of shrublands occurs in livestock-dominated areas that are not well managed. In a scenario focused on agricultural and livestock production, farms grow but their expansion within protected areas causes human-wildlife conflicts. Desirable near and far futures — characterised by environmental integrity, human-wildlife coexistence, and an equitable, thriving wildlife-based economy — are seen as attainable through coordinated land-based activities and the implementation of community-based conservation legislation. Outputs from this study demonstrate the value of a stakeholder-led approach in tackling conservation challenges and in planning for a sustainable future for an arid region heavily reliant on land-based livelihoods.

If you have to imagine what your children' life will be in 20 years, or your grandchildren' life in 40 years, how the landscape they will be living will look like and what kind of interaction they will have with Nature, which tools or media would you use?

This imagination, let’s call it scenario, could apply to a whole community, and it could be used to guide planning towards the desired future.

How to ensure a plurality of community voices can be represented, and that these voices can then be integrated into decision-making and planning?

The  KESHO tool could guide you in building scenario through a participatory process, integrating traditional and local knowledge into quantitative and spatially explicit modeling. The framework was firstly developed through national and local case studies in Eastern Africa  and then widely applied across Africa and beyond. 

Our study published in Regional Environmental Change journal shows an application of KESHO to investigate how land use and climate pressures may reshape the unique  Etosha landscape dryland, in Namibia. In the past few decades, Namibia has devoted a strong effort in increasing  coverage of protected and conserved areas, but great challenges are foreseen for the future.  In this study we investigated how the current development trend could lead to fulfill local development and conservation objectives, along with international goals for sustainability and biodiversity conservation, and in the long term the Africa Sustainability Agenda 2064. By using KESHO participatory scenario planning framework, we co-designed  with local communities three plausible alternative future pathways, and the impacts these would imply: Business-as-Usual (BAU); Agriculture & Livestock Production; Conservation & Sustainability. 

Outputs from this study demonstrate the value of a stakeholder-led approach in tackling conservation challenges and in planning for a sustainable future for an arid region heavily reliant on land-based livelihoods. The lesson learnt in Namibia case study can inform other countries facing similar challenges.

 

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Environmental Management
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences > Environmental Management
Landscape Ecology
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Anthropology > Environmental Anthropology > Landscape Ecology
Environmental Social Sciences
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Environmental Social Sciences
Conservation Biology
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Earth Sciences > Biogeosciences > Conservation Biology