Evidence Rooted in Context: Better Sexual and Reproductive Health and Life Trajectories
Published in Social Sciences and Public Health

Imagine a world where adolescent girls are left out of conversations, invisible in datasets, and underserved by programs intended to meet their sexual and reproductive health (SHR) needs. In many parts of the world, including across West Africa and the Middle East, this is reality. The sexual and reproductive choices and trajectories of women, girls — as well as men and boys — are navigated in the shadows, rather than being understood, heard, seen, and served by the health systems meant to support them.
Across West Africa and the Middle East, locally based researchers funded by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) worked to flip this script. Known as the Cedar Cohort, 16 researchers from 11 countries used implementation research to generate real-world evidence steeped in local context, grounded in community processes, and positioned to influence change.
Results across the cohort are captured in 11 papers released in the new journal supplement, Context matters: Real-world evidence and impact for better sexual and reproductive health in West Africa and the Middle East.
From Strategy to Reality: The Know-Do Gap
While many governments and agencies have robust sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) policies and guidelines, translating these into effective on-the-ground programs remains a challenge. This gap — between what we know works and what happens on the ground — is what researchers call the “know-do gap.”
Cedar Cohort researchers embraced implementation research to close this gap.
Asking questions like “how,” “for whom,” and “in what context” interventions work in real life, the teams designed and implemented interventions to address SRH challenges adolescents are facing today – and which will continue to shape their life trajectories.
Take, for instance, the use of community radio in Kenya to create opportunities for families to talk about gender norms and SRH. Or efforts in to Ghana co-develop peer education programs based on what adolescents themselves said they needed. In the Gambia, researchers worked with local leaders to challenge early marriage practices, resulting in measurable changes in attitudes and increasing the age of marriage.
Health Information Systems That Reflect Everyone
If we can’t see a problem, we can’t solve it. Far too often, health information systems in low- and middle-income countries leave out adolescents and other groups experiencing multiple vulnerabilities and barriers to access SHR information and services, especially in crisis settings.
In Jordan, researchers helped integrate siloed reproductive health data into a unified digital registry, improving continuity of care for pregnant women. In the West Bank, a comprehensive mapping of adolescent health services filled a major evidence gap in a region facing a humanitarian crisis.
“By prioritizing feasible and context-relevant indicators, our work laid the groundwork for a unified adolescent health monitoring framework in the West Bank—one that reflects both the needs on the ground and the realities of data collection in a fragmented system.” – Aisha Shalash, Researcher at Birzeit University
The message is clear: locally relevant health information systems, designed with and for communities, are crucial to equitable health systems.
Gender and Relationships Matter
While adolescent girls face distinct SRH challenges — such as early marriage, unplanned pregnancy, and sexual violence — gender equality must be seen as a broader societal issue. Projects in the Cedar Cohort explored the power of gender-transformative approaches, working with both boys and girls, and looking closely at how power, access, and social norms affect young people’s ability to make informed choices.
In Ghana, for example, researchers found that economic independence and social norms shaped boys’ and girls’ use of condoms. These findings underscored the need for intersectional, life-skills-based interventions that build agency and support healthy relationships.
Community-Led, Context-Specific, and Scalable
A central insight from the Cedar Cohort is this: Change happens when communities lead. The most promising solutions were those rooted in local partnerships, built on trust, and flexible enough to adapt to shifting contexts — whether due to political instability, pandemics, or social resistance.
By embedding research in real-world settings, and working with those most affected, these projects created pathways for scalable and sustainable interventions.
So, What Are the Takeaways?
- There is no single solution to improving adolescent SRHR. It requires locally rooted, gender-transformative, data-informed, and system-integrated strategies.
- Implementation research is a powerful tool for closing the know-do gap, bridging the distance between policy ambitions and lived realities.
- Data systems must be designed to reflect everyone’s realities, especially those who have been historically excluded.
- And above all, meaningful change starts by listening to and investing in the leadership of local actors, especially young people.
The Cedar Cohort offers context-rich and compelling examples for how to move from policy to practice, from global goals to grassroots action. At a time when progress is both critical and precarious, it is precisely this kind of work that lights the way forward.
A Way Forward
As we look ahead to the final stretch of the Sustainable Development Goals, we’re reminded that progress on adolescent health and rights won’t come from technical fixes or policy prescriptions alone — but from integrated, community-based, and multisectoral efforts that are locally led, equity-driven, and gender-transformative.
The Cedar Cohort demonstrates what’s possible when we center actions around community voices, value and support local knowledge, and invest in the systems — data, policies, and people — that support healthy transitions to adulthood for all adolescents, especially those often left behind.
Follow the Topic
-
Reproductive Health
This journal focuses on all aspects of human reproduction, including adolescent health, female fertility, contraception, and maternal health and all articles are open access.
Related Collections
With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Exploring the Role of Menstruation in School Girls’ Sexual and Reproductive Health in Low-Resource Settings
This collection seeks to examine the multifaceted impact of menstruation—including menstrual health, hygiene, and justice—on adolescent girls’ sexual and reproductive health (SRH) within educational settings in low-resource contexts. These include low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), high-income countries (HICs) with marginalized populations, and communities facing socioeconomic disadvantages, homelessness, or geographic isolation (e.g., rural and remote areas).
We aim to spotlight how inadequate menstrual health in these contexts can hinder girls’ educational experiences and broader life outcomes. Poor menstrual health is not only a barrier to consistent school attendance and academic performance but also has far-reaching implications for sexual and reproductive health, gender equality, and long-term economic empowerment. We are particularly interested in studies that explore the intersectionality of menstrual health with other social determinants of health and education, and that evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, policies, and innovative approaches aimed at improving menstrual equity.
We welcome original research—both qualitative and quantitative—that investigates the challenges adolescent girls face with regards menstrual health while attending school, including those linked to reproductive and sexual health, and that proposes actionable solutions. Key areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
• Sociocultural taboos, stigma, and lack of a supportive school environment
• Educational gaps in menstrual and reproductive health literacy
• Causes of menstruation-related school absenteeism beyond a lack of products, and this absenteeism’s impact on academic and psychosocial outcomes
• Strategies to engage boys and male educators in fostering a positive and inclusive menstrual health culture
• Understanding the links between menstruation and other areas of sexual and reproductive health, including the links between menstruation and reproductive justice, and contraception and family planning
By bringing together diverse perspectives and evidence-based research, this collection aspires to inform policy, guide program development, and ultimately contribute to the empowerment and well-being of adolescent girls in under-resourced educational settings.
We are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or contact the Editor-in-Chief.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Feb 27, 2026
Innovations in Addressing Unsafe Abortions in LMICs
Unsafe abortion is a major health problem of public health importance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is a leading cause of maternal mortality, and is often performed by unskilled people without medical training and in unsafe environments. Unsafe abortion estimates by the World Health Organization (WHO) have shown that about 25 million unsafe abortions occur each year, with about 7% of unsafe abortions occurring in LMICs thereby making Unsafe abortion among the top five causes of maternal mortality in LMICs.
This collection is focused on innovative strategies to reduce unsafe abortions and improve post-abortion care in LMICs where the incidence of Unsafe abortion has significantly impacted on the reproductive wellbeing of abortion seekers with women mostly affected. This public health crisis is driven by restrictive laws, stigma, limited access to healthcare services and trained providers that collectively results in unsafe abortion related complications include hemorrhage, infection, uterine perforation, among others.
Key areas of focus in this journal include technological advancements like telemedicine and self-managed medication abortion, policy innovations such as legal reforms and task-shifting to mid-level providers, and education and advocacy efforts to combat misinformation and stigma. Special focus is given to adolescents and marginalized populations facing the highest barriers. By highlighting evidence-based solutions, this collection aims to inform policies and programme interventions that will enhance reproductive health and rights in LMICs.
All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here).
We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or contact the Editor-in-Chief.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 10, Reduced Inequality.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Nov 26, 2025
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in