Lions & sea lions & bears, oh my: the value of natural history collections for studying the developing skeleton
Published in Ecology & Evolution, Zoology & Veterinary Science, and Anatomy & Physiology
Most mammalian embryos develop for weeks to months inside the mother’s body. This developmental strategy of giving birth to live young –known as viviparity– both protects the developing offspring and allows the mother to continuously supply nutrients over an extended period. Apart from monotremes, or egg-laying mammals, all other mammals give birth to live young, making studies of their early development difficult. Collection of prenatal materials for species other than established models is extremely challenging, both practically and ethically, due to factors such as the body size, habitat, reproductive biology, and conservation status.
Natural history museums around the world offer a simple, ethical means of studying mammalian development because their collections consist of hundreds to thousands of historically (and opportunistically) collected prenatal specimens for a wide range of mammals. By using non-invasive imaging technologies, such as micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), researchers can image the developing skeleton without harming these precious specimens and digitally share these data with the scientific community through public repositories.
This study was inspired when we discovered that the wet collections of the Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ) Mammalogy Department contain hundreds of mammalian embryos preserved in jars of ethanol which had not been previously used in research. Many were collected over 100 years ago.
Harvard MCZ collection.
To conduct our research, we used micro-CT to study the developmental sequence of bone formation (ossification sequence) in the mammalian order Carnivora. Species included the Steller sea lion, small Indian mongoose, lion, gray fox, brown bear, and small Indian civet. We chose to focus on carnivorans because previous research on carnivoran ossification sequences was largely limited to two domestic species: dogs and cats. Furthermore, the MCZ collection included singleton embryos from a wide taxonomic range of species, as well as numerous Steller sea lion embryos of different developmental stages. This diversity allowed us to compare both within and between species, as well as among animals living in terrestrial versus aquatic environments.
After CT-scanning, we digitally reconstructed the developing skeleton of each specimen and identified which bones were present. Based on these data, we could determine the order of bone formation by comparing the bones observed with those expected based on the adult skeleton. For example, if the femur was present in one specimen while the tibia was absent, we infer that the femur ossifies before the tibia in this species. Using this logic, we constructed ossification sequences for the skull and postcranial bones of each species. We then used an analysis method called Parsimov-based genetic inference to identify heterochronic changes in ossification sequence between species and to reconstruct ancestral ossification sequences throughout the carnivoran tree. Briefly, this method treats ossification sequence as a single complex character and generates trees to identify the minimum number of heterochronic shifts necessary to explain the data.
Carnivores are divided into two major lineages, the dog-like ‘caniforms’ and cat-like ‘feliforms.’ As luck would have it, each of these lineages includes a popular domestic species. We found that both the dog and cat are good models for the ossification sequence of their respective linages. This is a helpful finding since dogs and cats are much easier to study than other species, making them very useful models in both veterinary science as well as carnivoran biology in general. Pinniped species, however, were the exception; seals and sea lions showed differences in the timing and order of ossification of different bones – i.e. skeletal heterochronies – when compared both to each other as well as to the terrestrial carnivorans. This finding matches the high rates of heterochrony observed in the sutures of the crania of adult pinnipeds and may be related to adaptations to aquatic locomotion.
The micro-CT scans generated through this study are now publicly available via the Morphosource repository and we hope these data will facilitate the inclusion of embryonic data in future studies of carnivoran biology. We encourage other researchers to explore the collections available at their local natural history museum to gain critical insights into development and evolution.
We would like to thank the Genes, Organisms, and Ecosystems Research Experiences for Undergraduates (GEO REU) program for making this research possible, our reviewers for helpful comments on this manuscript, and the editor for inviting us to write this post.
Follow the Topic
-
BMC Zoology
This is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on zoology, including comparative physiology, mechanistic and functional studies, morphology, life history, animal behavior, signaling and communication, cognition, parasitism, systematics, biogeography and conservation.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Host–parasite interactions in wildlife
BMC Zoology welcomes research on host–parasite interactions in wild animals. Parasites are diverse and are associated with nearly all animal taxa and ecosystems. Parasites influence host physiology, behavior, reproduction, and life histories, while hosts impose selective pressures that shape parasite traits, strategies, and patterns of diversification. Together, these reciprocal interactions drive evolutionary change, ecological dynamics, and biological diversity in animals.
We welcome original research on, but not limited to:
Phylogenetics and systematics of parasites
- Systematics and taxonomy of animal parasites
- Phylogenetic relationships among parasite lineages and their hosts
- Cryptic diversity and species boundaries in parasite taxa
- Phylogeographic and historical patterns of parasite diversification
Evolutionary ecology and coevolution
- Host–parasite coevolution and reciprocal adaptation
- Parasite‑mediated divergence, local adaptation, and speciation
- Host switching and the evolutionary dynamics of parasite lineages
- Macroecological and comparative perspectives on host–parasite associations
Host defence, physiology, and immune responses
- Evolutionary and behavioural defences against parasitism in animals
- Natural variation in defence strategies across taxa, life stages, and environments
- Physiological and energetic costs of parasitism in relation to life‑history strategies
- Plastic and locally adapted host responses to parasitic interactions
Parasite diversity, biology, and evolution
- Evolutionary origins and repeated emergence of parasitism in animals
- Diversification of parasitic life histories, strategies, and transmission modes
- Phenotypic plasticity and context‑dependent traits in parasites
- Parasite development, behavior, and interactions with hosts
Behavior, life history, and reproductive interactions
- Behavioral changes associated with parasitism
- Effects of parasites on host reproduction, mating systems, and parental care
- Parasite‑mediated sexual selection, signaling, and conflict
- Behavioral and life‑history trade‑offs shaped by parasitic interactions, including reproductive and social forms of parasitism such as brood parasitism
Effects of anthropogenic stressors on parasite ecology and communities
- Climate change, land-use change, pollution, and other human-mediated factors
- Changes in abundance, distributions, dispersions, host associations, pathogenicity, phenology, species compositions, etc.
- Control of parasites
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 14: Life Below Water and SDG: 15 Life on Land.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Mar 10, 2027
Citizen science for zoological research
BMC Zoology is calling for submissions to our Collection, Citizen science for zoological research.
Citizen science has emerged as a powerful tool in zoological research, enabling the public to actively participate in scientific inquiry and data collection. This approach harnesses the observations and contributions of non-experts, allowing researchers to gather valuable information on wildlife populations, behaviors, and ecosystems. Citizen science initiatives span various methods, from organized wildlife monitoring projects to online platforms that facilitate species identification and distribution mapping. By incorporating public engagement into the scientific process, citizen science fosters a collaborative environment that can lead to more comprehensive and inclusive research outcomes.
Engaging the public in scientific research not only enhances data collection but also promotes awareness and appreciation for biodiversity and conservation efforts. Recent advances in technology, such as mobile applications and social media platforms, have made it easier for citizens to participate and share their findings, thereby expanding the reach of conservation efforts. Furthermore, citizen science has demonstrated its effectiveness in addressing pressing ecological challenges, allowing researchers to harness the collective knowledge and enthusiasm of communities to better understand and protect wildlife.
As research in citizen science continues to evolve, we may witness innovative methodologies and frameworks that enhance collaboration between scientists and the public. Future advances could lead to the establishment of more robust partnerships that bridge gaps in scientific knowledge and engage diverse populations in conservation efforts. Additionally, advancements in data analysis techniques may facilitate the integration of citizen-generated data into formal research, paving the way for more informed decision-making in wildlife management and conservation policies.
This Collection will consider studies on:
- Community engagement in wildlife monitoring
- Public participation in conservation initiatives
- Evaluating citizen science initiatives
- Impact of citizen science on public engagement
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 14: Life Below Water and SDG: 15 Life on Land.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Nov 11, 2026
