Menstrual cups and IUDs - what women need to know

World Contraception Day is my daughter’s 13th birthday. As a doctor specialising in contraception, and a mother of teenage girls it feels the perfect time to reflect on the different contraceptive options available to their generation...
Menstrual cups and IUDs - what women need to know
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Read the paper

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Menstrual cup and risk of IUD expulsion – a systematic review - Contraception and Reproductive Medicine

Background The menstrual cup is a safe, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly menstrual product which is increasing in usage, especially in younger women. The potential risk for concomitant menstrual cup use to increase IUD expulsion has been raised over the last 10 years, however, few studies assess this. This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesize the current specific evidence on menstrual cup use and risk of partial or total IUD expulsion. Methods PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched for publications available in English, until February 20th, 2021. Quantitative and qualitative studies, systematic reviews and case series reports were included. Websites of menstrual cup manufacturers LenaCup®, DivaCup®, Lunette®, AllMatters® and Saalt® were searched for warnings relevant to IUD expulsion. Results Seven studies were included in this review, comprising 73 partial or total IUD expulsion events in patients with IUD contraception using menstrual cups. The case study reports included two individuals who each experienced two and three expulsions respectively. Of the seven publications, three reported expulsion rates of 3.7%, 17.3% and 18.6%. Time to expulsion ranged from less than one week to two and a half years. These three studies disagree on whether there is a statistically significant association between menstrual cup use and IUD expulsion. Conclusion There is a possible association between menstrual cup use and increased risk of IUD expulsion and this information should be shared with patients. However evidence is scarce and high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to address this risk and the impact of factors such as age, menstrual cup removal technique, pelvic anatomy, IUD type, and measures such as cutting the IUD strings short or delaying menstrual cup use for a period post-insertion. This research gap is limiting patients’ ability to make informed choices regarding intrauterine contraception and menstrual management and must urgently be addressed in the context of rising IUD and menstrual cup use, particularly among a younger demographic who are seeking highly effective contraception.

In the UK now we have a range of progestogen-only, long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) including injectables, an implant and a variety of hormonal intrauterine devices. In the past 30 years, contraception has also increasingly been recognised and utilized for a wide range of other health benefits, for example, treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding, endometriosis, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and premenstrual syndrome often in more tailored regimens. Alongside newer methods and new ways of taking existing methods, the popularity of the much older, non-hormonal method, the copper intrauterine device (IUD) is steadily increasing. This mirrors the rising trend of menstrual cup usage particularly among younger women. In our article Menstrual cup and risk of IUD expulsion – a systematic review we examine the evidence to date and highlight an important research gap which is limiting the ability of these young women to make informed choices regarding intrauterine contraception and their menstrual management.

During a COVID lock down three years ago, I was contacted by a 4th year medical student who wanted to know whether clinicians and patients were aware of any association between menstrual cups and expulsion of IUDs and was keen to explore this topic. During my clinical training I had seen experienced clinicians advising IUD users against menstrual cups and had increasingly been asked about this in clinics. I had also started proactively asking women presenting with missing threads or expulsion of IUDs about their use of menstrual cups so had anecdotal evidence of this. However the national guidance at the time did not explicitly recommend counselling regarding this risk nor avoiding using the menstrual cup with an IUD. So together we began to have our own look at the evidence.

Since the publication of our article earlier this year, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) has published updated guidance on Intrauterine Contraception in March 2023 stating that “Evidence suggests that there could be increased risk of expulsion associated with menstrual cup use” and we think this is important to share with patients. However the guidance also highlights the lack of evidence to inform risk of intrauterine contraception expulsion associated with use of menstrual cups. In our article we call for high-quality randomised controlled trials to assess this risk and the impact of factors such as age, menstrual cup removal technique, pelvic anatomy, IUD type, menstrual cup brand and measures such as cutting the IUD strings short or delaying menstrual cup use for a time period post-insertion.

Despite enhanced contraception choices over the last 30 years, it remains important to maintain and support the safe usage of the copper IUD as the only non-hormonal, highly effective, longest-acting, reversible method and the most commonly used reversible method worldwide. Whilst there is undoubtedly work to be done to ensure that intrauterine methods are universally accessible, the extent to which menstrual management may compromise the effectiveness of intrauterine contraception should not continue to be overlooked.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Reproductive Medicine
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Reproductive Medicine
Health, Medicine and Society
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Health, Medicine and Society
General Practice and Family Medicine
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Health Care > General Practice and Family Medicine
Health Care
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Health Care

Related Collections

With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Contraceptive Decision-Making: Enhancing Family Planning Education and Accessibility

Target 3.7 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) calls on countries to ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive healthcare services, including family planning, information and education, and the integration of reproductive health into national strategies and programs by 2030. However, the unmet need for family planning remains the bottleneck in realizing these goals. The prevalence of unmet needs is high globally and more concerning in low-middle-income countries, calling for implementing better strategies. Family planning employs decision-making as a major component of reproductive health services. It is a woman`s ability to independently decide on the method she wants to use by successfully overcoming several barriers around her. Decision-making largely depends on awareness of the benefits of various family planning methods, their accessibility and affordability, and their pros and cons. Until recently, contraceptive decision-making has received inadequate attention because the stakeholders' focus has largely been on the availability, accessibility, and utilisation of the methods, as manifested by the primary health declarations in low- and middle-income countries. However, reproductive health services have received global attention regarding policy articulation, program design and implementation, and monitoring activities guided by robust evidence generated through research. More focus is now given to improving education and accessibility of family planning methods simultaneously. Various strategies for reaching informed decisions include comprehensive health advocacy, starting from sex education campaigns in schools and communities to post-natal services supplemented by the widespread availability of contraceptive methods across all healthcare centers and making them affordable through free government supplies and social marketing. Extra emphasis is given to involving male counterparts to foster shared responsibility for reproductive health and boost support for contraception within families and communities. The use of technology and creativity to increase access to contraception, like telemedicine for distant consultations and mobile health apps for information and tracking, are also being tested. Lastly, the role of customising family planning education and services to be culturally sensitive and respect one’s beliefs and values cannot be negated. This can be achieved through the engagement of community leaders and religious organisations to address cultural taboos and misconceptions about contraception. By employing these measures, we can improve family planning education and accessibility, allowing people to make informed decisions about their reproductive health and attain their ideal family size. Based on this background, the current collection encourages the submission of manuscripts (original articles, review articles) that aim at sexual health education, determinants of contraceptive use, access to contraceptive use in resource-poor countries and the role of men in family planning decisions to further our efforts in this regard.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Ongoing

Enhancing Contraceptive Education and Accessibility in Vulnerable Populations

The importance of comprehensive contraceptive education and accessibility cannot be overstated. Yet, as it is with most health services, within vulnerable populations, such crucial resources often remain out of reach, leading to adverse health outcomes and perpetuating cycles of inequality. This collection serves as a vital platform for scholars, researchers, and practitioners to gather information on contraceptive education and accessibility in vulnerable populations worldwide. It proposes to shed light on the current situations, innovative strategies, evidence-based interventions, and policy recommendations that can empower individuals, particularly those in marginalized groups, to make informed choices about their reproductive health. The collection welcomes a diverse range of contributions, including original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, policy analyses, case studies, commentaries, and perspectives. Authors are encouraged to present novel insights, empirical findings, and practical recommendations that can inform policy decision-making, program development, and clinical or public health practice in the field of reproductive health. The collection invites contributions that explore a wide range of research areas, including but not limited to: ● Barriers to access: Investigating the socio-economic, cultural, and geographical barriers that hinder contraceptive access and utilization among vulnerable populations. ● Perspectives: Documentation of perspectives on contraceptives and contraceptive use among vulnerable populations. ● Education and awareness: Assessing the effectiveness of various educational interventions and campaigns aimed at promoting contraceptive literacy and empowering individuals to make informed choices. ● Innovations in service delivery: Highlighting innovative approaches to delivering contraceptive services, such as telemedicine, community-based interventions, and task-shifting initiatives, to reach underserved populations. ● Policy and advocacy: Analyzing policy frameworks, legal barriers, and advocacy efforts aimed at improving contraceptive access, affordability, and coverage for vulnerable communities. ● Contraception in humanitarian settings: Exploring contraception education interventions and best practices impacting Policy in humanitarian environments. ● Adolescents and contraception: Predictors, best practices, policy implications, and impact related to adolescents’ use of contraception.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Ongoing