Behind the Paper

Minimizing catastrophic mutations as the selective force in the evolution of the universal modern genetic code.

An early addition of a Stop signal to the first functional genetic codes robustly predicts the subsequent evolution of codon to amino acid pairings in the universal modern genetic code.

Published in Ecology & Evolution

Go to the profile of Peter Nonacs
Peter Nonacs
Professor, UCLA
Like
Go to the profile of Adolf Heschl

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

Share with...

...or copy the link

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

Springer US
Springer US Springer US

Avoiding Catastrophic Mutations Accurately Predicts Amino Acid to Codon Pairing

DNA codon mutations involving Stop signals or the amino acid cysteine can be especially damaging. The former can break protein sequences or add extraneous amino acids. The latter can add or subtract disulfide bonds crucial in protein folding. We present a hypothetical scenario where Stop codons were present early in the evolution of the genetic code; and minimizing catastrophic mutations for code networks affected all subsequent amino acid/codon pairings. Predicted features of this “Catastrophic Mutation Minimization Hypothesis” (CMMH) are that: (1) Cysteine is mutationally adjacent to Stop, isolating a contiguous codon ‘neighborhood’ with high potential for catastrophe. (2) The sequence of amino acid additions order determines codon assignments through minimizing network-wide mutation costs. Overall, codon locations for 16 of the 20 amino acids in the genetic code are consistent with the CMMH, as are multiple other predictions. We propose an antecedent genetic code consisted of 16 doublet codons specifying 13–14 amino acids. Two variations of these networks are less susceptible to catastrophic mutations than 88.2–97.5% of randomly generated ones. Unlike some previous hypotheses, CMMH does not require the total replacement or rearrangement of amino acids at codons, with its disruptive potential for protein synthesis. Finally, the composition of this ancestral doublet genetic code has all the modern code’s utility: amino acids from four chemical types; start and stop signals; metal-binding ability; disulfide bridging for creating protein shapes; and possible epigenetic gene regulation. Thus, the modern code likely evolutionarily fine-tuned antecedent capabilities, rather than significantly increasing competence for making complex proteins.

The modern genetic code of 64 3-letter codon ‘words’ for 20 amino acids and 3 Stop signals is universal across all the organisms in the Tree of Life.  Its evolutionary origins are still mysterious, however.  It is obvious that the code could not have sprung into existence ‘as is’; meaning that its complexity must have evolved through several simpler ancestral codes.  Recent work using ancient and likely highly conserved protein sequences provides a potential order in which amino acids were added to the code, but this work by itself does not explain which codon ought to be paired to which amino acid. 

Nor, does this order explain when and where the Stop codons were added.  Such Stop codons are essential for ending protein construction, but they are also likely to be the most catastrophic for protein function when mutated.  Adding a Stop signal in the middle of a coding sequence ‘breaks’ the produced protein.  Removing the Stop adds a superfluous string of amino acids.

Therefore, if a Stop codon was an early addition to the evolving genetic code, subsequent additions of amino acids could have preferentially paired with codons in a pattern that minimizes the frequency of mutations to or from Stop.  Nonacs and Nonacs (2025) modeled the sequential evolution of the genetic code if an early Stop signal was also present: I.e., the Catastrophic Mutation Minimization Hypothesis (CMMH).  Multiple predictions from the CMMH are consistent with the order in which codons pair with amino acids.  Most strikingly, the amino acid cysteine is accurately predicted to occupy the closest mutation location to Stop codons.  Pairs of cysteines can form disulfide bridges that are essential for protein function, and therefore, can also result in catastrophic mutations. 

Thus, the CMMH predicts that a Stop/cysteine codon ‘neighborhood’ is both essential for protein construction, and simultaneously mutationally most removed from the rest of the code. 

In total, 16 of the 20 amino acid to codon pairings are predicted by the CMMH – a precision heretofore not achieved by any other model of genetic code evolution.  

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-025-10294-0

Go to the profile of Peter Nonacs
Peter Nonacs
Professor, UCLA

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website. You can decide for yourself which categories you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available.

Further information can be found in our privacy policy.

Cookie Control

Customise your preferences for any tracking technology

The following allows you to customize your consent preferences for any tracking technology used to help us achieve the features and activities described below. To learn more about how these trackers help us and how they work, refer to the cookie policy. You may review and change your preferences at any time.

Cookie policy Privacy policy
Always active, cannot be turned off
More information

These trackers are used for activities that are strictly necessary to operate or deliver the service you requested from us and, therefore, do not require you to consent.

More information

These trackers help us to deliver personalized marketing content and to operate, serve and track ads.

More information

These trackers help us to deliver personalized marketing content to you based on your behaviour and to operate, serve and track social advertising.

More information

These trackers help us to measure traffic and analyze your behaviour with the goal of improving our service.

More information

These trackers help us to provide a personalized user experience by improving the quality of your preference management options, and by enabling the interaction with external networks and platforms.