Modeling Carbon in Cereal Crops: A Practical Approach to Above- and Below-Ground Estimation

Accurate estimation of carbon in cereal crops is vital for climate-smart agriculture. This practical model offers a simple yet effective approach to quantify both above- and below-ground carbon, supporting sustainable farming and carbon accounting in crop-based systems.
Modeling Carbon in Cereal Crops: A Practical Approach to Above- and Below-Ground Estimation
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

Technology in Agronomy
Technology in Agronomy Technology in Agronomy

A simple model for estimation of above and below ground carbon in cereal crops

<p>Carbon (C) is an essential part of healthy soil. Healthy soils play an important role in improving the life of all living organisms on earth (plants, humans, animals, birds, insects, microbes etc.). Best agronomic practices for field crop production sequester more carbon (due to higher photosynthesis) below and above the ground that makes the soils healthy and sustainable. Healthy soils increase yield per unit area and so reduce the problem of food insecurity. Higher photosynthetic efficiency (higher CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by the plants) reduces the problem of global warming and climate change. According to an estimate, plants capture about 860 gigatons of CO<sub>2</sub> each year from the atmosphere, storing it in their shoots, and roots (1 kg of carbon is equal to 3.67 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>). The aim of this study was to develop a simple calculation (model) for researchers to easily estimate the carbon content (CC) capture by plants in below (roots) and above ground (shoots) parts. Considerable variation in total CC (TCC) accumulation and its partitioning into above ground parts (ACC) and below ground parts (BCC) exists which depends on crop species and genotypes, crop nutrition, crop competitions and intercropping, fertilizers application, irrigation, tillage, biotic and abiotic stresses, soil types and environment etc. The CC estimation is explained in detail with four examples on major cereal crops (wheat, rice, maize and barley) for the world leading countries in 2018−2019. In the first example using wheat, the TCC estimated for wheat crop in Pakistan was 37.4 metric tons (MT) of which 30.5 MT was allocated into ACC (shoots) and 6.9 MT into BCC (roots). The highest value of TCC accumulation for wheat crop was estimated for the European Union which was 216.3 MT (176.4 ACC + 39.9 BCC). In the second example using rice crop, TCC for the world leading countries was estimated and the leading country was China with TCC of 161.7 MT (131.9 ACC + 29.8 BCC). Example three is about the CC estimation for maize crop, and the leading country was USA having the highest TCC value of 505.3 MT (ACC = 412.1 MT, BCC = 93.2 MT). The Russian Federation ranked first for barley crop and the highest TCC value of 29.2 MT was recorded (23.8 MT ACC + 5.4 MT BCC). It was confirmed while using this model that out of the 100% (TCC) fixed, about 82% CC is partitioned into above ground parts (ACC) and the remaining 18% CC is allocated into below ground parts (BCC). Due to this model, we can easily calculate the TCC accumulation and its partitioning into ACC and BCC per unit area (kg·ha<sup>−1</sup>). For example, the TCC was easily calculated for the 40 world leading countries for wheat, rice, maize and barley during 2019. The results revealed that the TCC ranged from 4,414 to 13,243 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup> for wheat, 4,578 to 11,444 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup> for rice<bold>,</bold> 5,150 to 15,450 kg·ha<sup>−<bold>1</bold></sup> for maize, and 3,443 to 13,733 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup> for barley among the top 40 countries. This is the most simplified approach for estimating carbon content in the below-ground (roots) and above-ground (shoots) parts of field crops.</p>

Modeling Carbon in Cereal Crops: A Practical Approach to Above- and Below-Ground Estimation

Soil health lies at the heart of productive and sustainable agriculture, and carbon (C) is one of its most vital components. Carbon-rich soils not only support higher crop yields but also play a critical role in mitigating climate change and enhancing biodiversity. In this blog, we explore a simple yet powerful model developed to estimate carbon sequestration in cereal crops—both above and below the ground.

Why Carbon Matters

Carbon stored in plants and soils has far-reaching benefits. Through photosynthesis, plants draw carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the atmosphere, incorporating it into their tissues. A portion of this carbon ends up in the roots and soil, helping to build organic matter and soil fertility. In fact, healthy, carbon-rich soils are more resilient, water-retentive, and productive. These benefits directly address two of the world’s pressing challenges—food insecurity and climate change.

According to global estimates, plants capture about 860 gigatons of CO₂ annually. Because 1 kg of carbon equals 3.67 kg of CO₂, even small increases in soil carbon storage can have meaningful climate benefits.

A Simple Model for Estimating Plant Carbon

To aid researchers, agronomists, and policymakers, a simple and practical model has been developed to estimate total carbon content (TCC) captured by cereal crops. This model allows for easy partitioning of carbon into above-ground (ACC) and below-ground (BCC) biomass. The beauty of this model lies in its adaptability—it can be applied to different cereal crops, regions, and agricultural practices.

Carbon accumulation in plants varies widely depending on species, cultivar, soil type, nutrition, intercropping, irrigation, tillage, and environmental conditions. The model accounts for these differences by using standardized formulas that calculate TCC and its partitioning into shoots and roots.

Real-World Examples from Major Cereal Crops

To illustrate the model, carbon content was estimated for four major cereal crops—wheat, rice, maize, and barley—in the top-producing countries for the 2018–2019 period.

  • Wheat (Pakistan): TCC was estimated at 37.4 metric tons (MT), with 30.5 MT in ACC and 6.9 MT in BCC.

  • Wheat (EU): The European Union led globally with 216.3 MT TCC (176.4 ACC + 39.9 BCC).

  • Rice (China): China topped the rice estimates with 161.7 MT TCC (131.9 ACC + 29.8 BCC).

  • Maize (USA): The USA showed the highest maize TCC at 505.3 MT (412.1 ACC + 93.2 BCC).

  • Barley (Russia): Russia led with 29.2 MT (23.8 ACC + 5.4 BCC).

On average, about 82% of carbon is stored in above-ground parts (shoots), while 18% resides in roots—a useful ratio for broader estimations.

Scaled Applications and Impacts

Beyond national figures, the model has been applied to 40 leading countries, revealing per-hectare TCC ranging from:

  • 4,414–13,243 kg·ha⁻¹ for wheat

  • 4,578–11,444 kg·ha⁻¹ for rice

  • 5,150–15,450 kg·ha⁻¹ for maize

  • 3,443–13,733 kg·ha⁻¹ for barley

This standardized, scalable model enables researchers and practitioners to estimate carbon fluxes quickly and reliably—contributing to better land-use planning, carbon accounting, and sustainable intensification strategies.

Toward Carbon-Smart Agriculture

This simple modeling approach provides a valuable tool for advancing carbon-smart agricultural practices. By quantifying how much carbon is stored in crops and soil, it becomes easier to make informed decisions on crop selection, residue management, and climate mitigation strategies. In the face of growing climate challenges, tools like this empower stakeholders to feed the soil while feeding the world.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Go to the profile of Prof. Dr. AMANULLAH
7 months ago

Amanullah. 2023. A simple model for estimation of above and below ground carbon in cereal crops. Technology in Agronomy 3:8
https://doi.org/10.48130/TIA-2023-0008

Follow the Topic

Agriculture
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Agriculture
Sustainability
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability
Environmental Sciences
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences
Agroecology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Ecology > Agroecology
Soil Science
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Agriculture > Soil Science