Prescription in peril: the sociology of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in low resource settings

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant threat to global health. By 2050, if left unchecked, it is estimated that AMR could lead to 10 million deaths annually worldwide.

Published in Microbiology

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Prescription in peril: the sociology of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in low resource settings - Discover Social Science and Health

The escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a significant public health challenge, particularly in low-resource settings where access to appropriate healthcare and medications is limited. While biological factors such as genetic mutations and horizontal gene transfer are fundamental drivers of AMR, sociological forces also play a substantial role in its emergence and spread. Nevertheless, the sociology antibiotic use, and access in low-resource settings is often overlooked. This commentary addresses the intricate sociological aspects, including sociocultural, political, and economic factors that contribute to suboptimal antibiotic use and the proliferation of AMR in these settings. Drawing on numerous reports from low- and middle-income countries, it is evident that patient health beliefs, provider prescribing practices, pharmaceutical supply chains, and broader health system weaknesses intersect to drive inappropriate antibiotic consumption. The impact of social disparities, poverty, limited health literacy, and the unregulated drug markets’ shadow economy undermine efforts to ensure responsible antibiotic use, making it critically significant. Consequently, it is imperative to develop tailored interventions that address the nuanced social dynamics perpetuating the crisis of antibiotic resistance in resource-limited’ communities. The findings highlight an urgent need to initiate and strengthen community-based interventions through multifaceted strategies targeting individual behaviors, healthcare system capacities, and the broader sociopolitical determinants of antimicrobial use and resistance.

The escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a significant public health challenge, particularly in low resource settings where access to appropriate healthcare and medications is limited. While biological factors such as genetic mutations and horizontal gene transfer are fundamental drivers of AMR, the sociological forces also play a substantial role in its emergence and spread. Nevertheless, the sociology of antibiotic use, and access in low-resource settings is often overlooked. This commentary addresses the intricate sociological aspects, including sociocultural, political, and economic factors that contribute to suboptimal antibiotic use and the proliferation of AMR in these settings. Drawing on numerous reports from low- and middle-income countries, it is evident that patient health beliefs, provider prescribing practices, pharmaceutical supply chains, and broader health system weaknesses intersect to drive inappropriate antibiotic consumption. Consequently, it is imperative to develop tailored interventions that address the nuanced social dynamics perpetuating the crisis of antibiotic resistance in resource-limited’ communities.

Let's unite to promote responsible antibiotic use and support sustainable healthcare solutions. Together, we can preserve the effectiveness of these vital medicines for future generations. 💊🌟
hashtag#AntibioticResistance hashtag#PublicHealth hashtag#CommunityEngagement hashtag#Healthcare hashtag#SustainableSolutions  

https://doi.org/10.1007/s44155-025-00225-1

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Antimicrobial Resistance
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Microbiology > Medical Microbiology > Antimicrobials > Antimicrobial Resistance

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Health as a Multidimensional Social Phenomenon: Evidence-Based Theoretical Perspectives

Health has traditionally been approached from biomedical and individualistic perspectives. However, the processes that shape health and illness go beyond the individual and are embedded in social, cultural, political, and economic contexts. Durkheim, Marx, and Weber, for example, provided the theoretical foundations for understanding health as a social and structural phenomenon. Parsons introduced the concept of the “sick role,” defining the normative expectations of illness in modern societies. Later scholars such as Foucault and Illich expanded this view by examining power, professional authority, and the social construction of medical knowledge. Luhmann and Beck explored the sociology of risk, which is closely related to the social dimensions of health. These perspectives show that health is a historically and socially constructed and configured reality. This Collection aims to gather research that analyzes health as a multidimensional social phenomenon, understood as the result of complex interactions between social structures, institutional practices, power relations, community dynamics, cultural imaginaries, and subjective experiences.

Objectives:

• Explore health through multidimensional approaches that integrate social, cultural, economic, political, and environmental variables.

• Foster a plural dialogue among different theoretical approaches (sociology of health, critical social theory, public health, medical anthropology, cultural studies, etc.).

• Bring together theoretical research and rigorous case studies that provide evidence and help to understand health as a collective and interdependent phenomenon.

• Promote interpretations of health that move away from biomedical reductionism, while remaining open to dialogue with that perspective.

Scope and types of contributions:

Original manuscripts that meet the following criteria will be considered:

1. A focus on the social and multidimensional interpretation of health.

2. Acceptance of different theoretical perspectives (critical, interpretative, systemic, phenomenological, etc.).

3. Manuscripts must be theoretical or theoretical–empirical, but always supported by evidence, whether qualitative, quantitative, comparative, or from systematic reviews.

4. Case studies with strong theoretical articulation will also be considered.

5. Special attention will be given to contributions that analyze health as a collective, structural, or institutional phenomenon, avoiding its reduction to individual-level variables.

6. Manuscripts that explore the multidimensionality of the factors associated with health (social determinants, inequalities, policies, subjectivities, territory, etc.) will be valued.

7. Articles related to social health or the health of the social system, in the broadest sense (institutional well-being, social cohesion, sustainability of care systems, etc.), will also be accepted.

Keywords: Social health, Multidimensionality of health, Social theory, Interpretive studies, Sociohermeneutics and sociosemiotics, Politics, Culture, Social values, Sociohistory, Collective health.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, SDG 10, and SDG 16.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 31, 2026

Innovative Approaches, Strategic Directions, and Interventions for People Living with HIV

The nexus of psychological health and societal acceptance within the context of People Living with HIV (PLHIV) constitutes a profoundly intricate and critically significant field of research. Despite monumental advancements in antiretroviral therapies, the persistent mental health challenges faced by PLHIV including chronic psychological distress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and internalized stigma remain grossly under-addressed. These unresolved issues not only perpetuate a cycle of marginalization but also amplify barriers to effective health outcomes and psychosocial integration.

This Collection solicits original, high-caliber contributions that investigate the multifaceted psychological experiences of PLHIV, scrutinizing how both intra- and interpersonal acceptance—encompassing self-acceptance and societal inclusion interact to shape mental health trajectories. We are particularly interested in rigorous studies that elucidate the intricate dynamics of HIV-related stigma, resilience mechanisms, coping strategies, and the psychosocial impacts of living with a chronic, stigmatized condition.

We encourage scholarly inquiries into evidence-based interventions, clinical frameworks, and public health policies aimed at enhancing the psychological resilience of PLHIV. Contributions should also address the evolving role of community-based support networks and institutional systems in mitigating the psychosocial burdens faced by this population. By offering a multifactorial perspective on these issues, this collection seeks to catalyze transformative discussions that inform best practices, advocacy, and global policy initiatives focused on improving the mental health outcomes and societal acceptance of PLHIV.

Keywords: Mental Health Disparities, HIV-Related Stigma, Psychological Resilience, Coping Mechanisms and Strategies, Social Integration and Acceptance, HIV Mental Health Interventions, Psychosocial Impact of HIV, Public Health Policy and Advocacy, Social Support Systems for PLHIV, Self-Acceptance and Identity in HIV.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Oct 30, 2026