Severe diarrhea in newborns: Tiny tummy, big mystery

Ever wondered why newborns often get severe diarrhea? It’s usually due to intestinal viruses like corona- and rotaviruses. While genetics and the immune system are often blamed, the role of mucus, a key barrier in our bodies, is often overlooked.
Severe diarrhea in newborns: Tiny tummy, big mystery
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Porcine ex-vivo intestinal mucus has age-dependent blocking activity against transmissible gastroenteritis virus - Veterinary Research

Transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) causes high mortality in young piglets (< 3 days of age). With aging, the susceptibility/morbidity/mortality rates drop. We previously hypothesized that the age-related changes in the intestinal mucus could be responsible for this resistance. Hence, this study investigated the effect of porcine intestinal mucus from 3-day and 3-week-old pigs on the free mobility of the virulent TGEV Miller strain, and on the infection in swine testicle (ST) cells. Single particle tracking (SPT) revealed that TGEV had significantly higher diffusion coefficients in 3-day mucus compared to 3-week mucus. TGEV and charged and uncharged control nanoparticles diffused freely in 3-day mucus but were hindered by 3-week mucus in the diffusion model; TGEV mimicked the diffusion behavior of negatively charged carboxylated particles. Inoculation of ST cells with TGEV in the presence of 3-week mucus resulted in a significantly lower average number of infected cells (30.9 ± 11.9/5 fields) compared with 3-day mucus (84.6 ± 16.4/5 fields). These results show that 3-week mucus has a significant TGEV-blocking activity compared to 3-day mucus in free diffusion and infection of the underlying susceptible cells. Additionally, a label-free proteomics analysis revealed an increased expression of mucin 13, known for negatively regulating the tight junctions in intestinal epithelium, in 3-day-old pigs. In 3-week-old pigs, a higher expression of mucin 2, a type of secreted mucin which is known for inhibiting coronavirus infection, was observed. Concludingly, this study demonstrated a protective effect of 3-week mucus against viral infections.

The Viral Culprits

In the world of pigs, porcine enteric coronaviruses wreak havoc, causing severe gastroenteritis with infection rates soaring up to 100% in young piglets. These viruses, including Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus (TGEV), Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV), and Porcine Deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), are a constant concern for the pig industry due to their high infection and mortality rates in young suckling piglets. Researchers have long puzzled over why these tiny tummies are so vulnerable. The answer might lie in the mucus—a gel-like barrier that lines the intestines and other hollow organs.

The Role of Mucus

Mucus is a major part of the innate immune system, covering the hollow organs of most mammals, including humans. It provides a barrier against normal bacteria present in the body and invading pathogens like viruses. This mucus is a gel that consists mainly of water, with large glycoproteins called mucins giving it its gel-like properties. It also contains other proteins, lipids, and electrolytes. Specialized cells in the inner lining of hollow tissues, called Goblet cells, are responsible for the formation of the mucus layer. This layer changes in terms of quality and quantity with age.

Age-Related Changes in Mucus

Studies have demonstrated a protective effect of mucus and mucins against disease-causing bacteria, viruses, and parasites. Mucus can either physically block pathogens by entrapment, inhibiting their access to target cells, or through chemical and immune entities present in the mucus. The changing parameters of these entities during infections can provide insights into their relation to disease pathogenesis. Researchers suspected that the severity of infection in young piglets could be related to these variations in mucosal components.

To investigate this, a study was conducted with four specific aims:

  1. To check the changes in the expression of important coronavirus receptors in three different ages of pig intestines.
  2. To investigate the changes occurring in intestinal morphology and mucus-producing cells of the intestines.
  3. To check the age-dependent blocking effect of intestinal mucus against TGEV.
  4. To see the age-related physical and chemical changes occurring in the pig intestinal mucus.

Changes in Intestinal Morphology and Mucus-Producing Cells

The study examined changes in intestinal morphology, the number of mucus-producing cells, and the expression of coronavirus receptors APN, DPP4, ACE2, and TMPRSS2 in pigs with aging. The expression pattern of these receptors was explored in four different regions of the intestines (duodenum, mid-jejunum, ileum, and colon) from three different ages of pigs (3 days, 3 weeks, 3 months). Immunofluorescence staining was used to visualize this pattern. The results showed that except for DPP4 in the jejunum, the expression of these receptors is highly variable and does not correlate with the age of the animal. Hence, the age-dependent susceptibility of animals to enteric coronaviruses is not dependent on the expression of these receptors.

This shifted the focus to changes in intestinal morphology and the number of mucus-producing cells. Using histochemical techniques, critical changes were observed in different regions of the intestines with aging. The main changes included an increase in the villus height-to-crypt depth ratio with aging, which affects nutrition absorption and mucus flow. The enterocytes, which are the main epithelial cells of the intestinal lining, increased in length with aging, which has significant implications for virus attachment and cell entry. Additionally, the number of mucus-producing cells increased with aging in all intestinal regions. These findings led to the conclusion that age-related changes occurring in intestinal mucus could help protect older animals against severe infections compared to newborn animals.

Protective Effect of Mucus Against Viral Infections

The age-dependent protective effect of porcine intestinal mucus against viral infections was explored in detail. The blocking effect of whole intestinal mucus extracted from 3-day and 3-week-old animals against TGEV was examined by tracking viral diffusion in the mucus and comparing the results with similar-sized, differently charged nanoparticles. The study showed that TGEV and control nanoparticles diffused freely in 3-day mucus while being hindered by 3-week mucus. Additionally, the protective effect of mucus against TGEV infection of susceptible ST cells was checked in the presence/absence of mucus. The results indicated that 3-week mucus has a significant TGEV-blocking activity compared to 3-day mucus, demonstrating the protective effect of intestinal mucus against viral infection and that the protective activity increases with age.

Physiochemical Properties of Mucus

The physiochemical properties of the mucus samples were also investigated. The flow pattern of mucus was measured in terms of viscosity using its rheological properties. The 3-week mucus exhibited more viscosity and less shear thinning compared to the 3-day mucus. Furthermore, mucus forms a meshwork of interlinked mucins that create variable-sized pores. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to assess the topography of these surfaces. The mean pore size for 3-day mucus was higher than that of 3-week mucus, with more than 80% of the pores in 3-day mucus being larger than the average diameter of enteric coronaviruses compared to only 50% in 3-week mucus. Additionally, the protein profile of the mucus samples was assessed using mass spectrometry. Higher levels of MUC13 and APN were found in 3-day mucus, while increased MUC2 expression was observed in 3-week mucus. These parameters are known to support higher infection rates in young pigs. Thus, it was concluded that physiochemical differences between the intestinal mucus of 3-day-old and 3-week-old pigs show key differences that could explain the decrease in viral susceptibility of older pigs.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the immune system and genetics play their roles, the often-overlooked mucus might just be the unsung hero—or villain—in this tiny tummy mystery. Understanding these changes could pave the way for new treatments and preventive measures, ensuring healthier beginnings for both piglets and human infants. The study highlights the importance of considering age-related changes in mucus composition and structure when studying infectious diseases, virus tissue tropism, and developing therapeutics.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Virus-host Interaction
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Microbiology > Virology > Systems Virology > Virus-host Interaction
Mucosal Immunology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Immunology > Mucosal Immunology
Gastroenteritis
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Diseases > Gastrointestinal Diseases > Gastroenteritis
Diarrhoea
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Diseases > Gastrointestinal Diseases > Intestinal diseases > Diarrhoea

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Respiratory diseases of swine: co-infections and multifactorial aspects

Respiratory disease is one of the most important cause of economical loss in swine production. It is well known that many pathogens are able to cause infections at the lower respiratory tract, and it is true that a cooperation among some of these pathogens may significantly increase damage and mortality. On the other hand, some of these potential pathogens are normally present in clinically healthy (carrier) animals. Therefore, the definition of “coinfection”, “super-infection” or “mixed infections” is not always clear. Indeed, there is a difference between two pathogens working together through known and proved mechanisms to increase damage to the host and just the simultaneous presence of two pathogens by chance, but probably without any cause-effect.

The objective of this series is to critically discuss what is really known about coinfections but with an interpretative analysis of available data and their biological significance. This series also includes reviews focused on key respiratory diseases associated with multifactorial respiratory disease of swine; for instance, discussions of viruses considered part of the Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex, such as swine Influenza A Virus (swIAV), Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), and Porcine CircoVirus type 2 (PCV2) as well as bacteria like Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Bordetella bronchiseptica.

Veterinary Research invites you to submit articles on the topic of co-infections. To submit your manuscript, please use our online submission system, and indicate in your cover letter that you would like the manuscript to be considered for this article collection.

For more information about the journal and how to submit your article to Veterinary Research, please see our submission guidelines. Any accepted articles will appear together on this collection page, as and when the publications are ready.

To read our related collections on co-infections in animals, please see here.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Ongoing

Co-infections responsible for cattle respiratory diseases

Respiratory diseases are major causes of mortality, morbidity, and economic losses in cattle. Different pathogens, notably viruses and bacteria, are responsible for lower respiratory tract infections in bovines. By weakening their host, these pathogens facilitate opportunistic co-infections by other pathogens. In addition to the direct impact on animal health, these co-infections are major causes of the excessive use of antibiotics in farms. These treatments alter commensal flora of animals, which are known to participate in the biological equilibrium and immune status of organisms, thus increasing the risks of developing other illnesses. Furthermore, widespread and improper use of antibiotics in agriculture results in their release in the environment which favours the emergence of resistant bacteria and constitutes a serious threat for ecosystems and human health. These pressing concerns warrant a discussion concerning policies for antibiotics use in farms and livestock management practices to prevent such co-infections.

The objective of this series is to provide a comprehensive coverage of up-to-date research related to respiratory co-infections affecting cattle, in line with their impact on animal and human health, together with the preventive and curative measures that can be developed to control their impact. The series will focus on the most prevalent pathogens responsible for cattle disease, such as bovine respiratory syncytial virus, influenza D virus, bovine tuberculosis, and associated co-infections.

Veterinary Research invites you to submit articles on the topic of co-infections. To submit your manuscript, please use our online submission system, and indicate in your cover letter that you would like the manuscript to be considered for this article collection.

For more information about the journal and how to submit your article to Veterinary Research, please see our submission guidelines. Any accepted articles will appear together on this collection page, as and when the publications are ready.

To read our related collections on co-infections in animals, please see here.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Ongoing