The Relationships Between Strengths-Based Teaching Practices and Students' General, Strengths, and Academic Self-Efficacy
Published in Behavioural Sciences & Psychology and Education

BACKGROUND
Deficit-based teaching practices are deeply ingrained in higher education. For example, professors may use subtractive grading, set low expectations, make judgments or stereotypes of students based on their backgrounds, or ignore their backgrounds altogether. To address the significant issues associated with the deficit-based teaching approach and to promote engagement, confidence, and academic success, educators can transition to a strengths-based teaching approach, which identifies and nurtures students’ unique abilities, talents, and potential.
WHY WE PURSUED THIS STUDY
As professors in higher education, we continually encounter students who have low self-efficacy, which is the belief in their ability to accomplish specific tasks or goals. This may be due to a lack of support, poor role models, negative feedback, or a feeling of perfectionism. Yet, self-efficacy is particularly important for students as it impacts their behavior, motivation, and overall performance in school.
As such, we wondered if, as teachers, we could positively influence our students’ confidence and belief in themselves. So, we pursued our study on The Relationships Between Strengths-Based Teaching Practices and Students' General, Strengths, and Academic Self-Efficacy, hoping that the results would help us to quantify the impact teachers have on their students’ self-efficacy. Furthermore, through publication, we also aimed to share the results with other educators who would be open to changing their teaching practices to a strengths-based approach.
RESEARCH PROCESS
Once we received approval to conduct the study, we recruited college students to participate. The sample included a diverse group of 268 participants from a community college in the Northwest United States, a university in the Southwest United States, and a university in the Midwestern United States. The participants represented students at different stages in their academic journey from a variety of academic disciplines.
Our quantitative research was conducted using a comprehensive set of four instruments to gather data. One tool assessed students' perceptions of their teachers' implementation of strengths-based teaching practices. The remaining three tools measured college students' overall self-efficacy, strengths self-efficacy, and academic self-efficacy. This rigorous approach allowed us to obtain a holistic understanding of the impact of strengths-based teaching on students' self-efficacy.
COLLABORATIVE EFFORT
This research project was an example of true collaboration between like-minded education professionals, and each contributor shared their gifts with the group. For instance, the main author has extensive experience supporting students' strengths in and out of the classroom and proposed and implemented the research project. Additionally, the second author of the research team has a strong psychology background, and they were able to analyze the data and interpret the findings. Lastly, our research team benefitted from the expert writing skills of our third author. By working together and utilizing the strengths of each group member, our research project went better than we could have imagined.
WIDER CONTEXT OF OUR FINDINGS
The results of this study indicated a positive perception of teachers’ strengths-based teaching, suggesting that this approach could be effective in various educational settings and for students with different backgrounds and academic goals. Rather than concentrating solely on students' weaknesses, according to our participants, these educators acknowledged and fostered their students' talents, interests, and positive qualities. As such, there are practical implications to these findings, such as the potential for implementing strengths-based teaching strategies to enhance student engagement, motivation, and academic achievement across diverse classroom environments. Furthermore, this approach not only empowers students to recognize and leverage their unique abilities but also cultivates a supportive and inclusive learning environment conducive to holistic development.
Additionally, statistically significant, moderately positive correlations were found between strengths-based teaching practices and college students' overall, strengths, and academic self-efficacy. In other words, when teachers utilize strengths-based teaching, there is a potential that they could have a positive impact on students’ belief in their capabilities in school and other contexts. For instance, a professor interested in transitioning to a strengths-based approach could provide feedback that focuses on students’ strengths rather than their weaknesses, ultimately influencing their students’ confidence in their capacity to succeed across various domains of life. Also, when challenges occur, this student might also be able to demonstrate resilience and adapt to change so they can strive toward their goals.
PRACTICAL STRATEGIES
Implementing strengths-based teaching in and out of the classroom requires intention, but this study's results indicate that it is worth the effort.
Here are some practical strategies for implementing strengths-based practices in and out of the classroom:
1. Identify and acknowledge students’ strengths through interactions in the classroom.
“I notice you are demonstrating leadership in this collaborative project. This skill is valuable as you will likely work with others in your future career, so you are already gaining valuable experience!”
2. Integrate strengths assessments into the curriculum and use the results to individualize learning.
“I noticed that your VIA Character Strengths assessment indicated that you are a courageous person. There is a speech competition coming up; I wonder if you might like to apply.”
3. Provide class activities that emphasize students’ strengths and show them how those strengths will be beneficial.
“During your mock teaching demonstration, you showed a lot of poise under pressure. This is a valuable skill as we often need to perform in stressful situations.”
4. Incorporate students’ strengths into feedback.
“I was really impressed with your creative approach to this assignment. This can be a valuable trait for coming up with unique solutions to problems that arise.”
CONCLUSION
Regardless of your title — professor, educator, teacher, instructor, lecturer, tutor, mentor, or coach — you and your students can all reap the rewards of transitioning from a deficit-based approach to a strengths-based approach. Drawing from our collaborative discussions, teaching experience, and the outcomes of our study, we strongly advocate for educators in all sectors to contemplate adopting strengths-based teaching. We are confident that you will witness increased student engagement, enhanced academic performance, and a boost in your students' self-efficacy and confidence.
Follow the Topic
-
Discover Psychology
This is an international, open access journal that publishes research in behavioral sciences and related fields, including health, environment, neuroscience, business, economics, ergonomics, linguistics, and education.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Mental Health and SDGs: Examining Interrelationships Between Mental Health and Agenda 2030
Mental health is integral to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), as it intersects with all the global targets for Agenda 2030. The inclusion of mental health within Agenda 2030 reflects its importance for achieving global well-being and equity. However, the complex relationships between mental health and the SDGs are often underexplored. For instance, poor mental health can hinder educational attainment, economic productivity, and resilience to environmental crises, while systemic inequities, climate change, and conflict exacerbate mental health challenges globally.
Despite growing global commitments, the integration of mental health into development agendas remains fragmented. Research is often siloed, focusing on either mental health outcomes or SDG targets, rather than exploring their interdependencies. Furthermore, there is limited understanding of how mental health interventions can accelerate SDG achievements or how progress on the SDGs can promote mental well-being. Addressing these gaps is essential to building inclusive, sustainable communities where mental health and development reinforce one another.
This collection aims to provide a platform for interdisciplinary research that examines the interrelationships between mental health and the SDGs. We welcome studies that investigate how mental health issues influence progress on the SDGs and how development efforts can address mental health disparities. This collection will offer critical insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers working to integrate mental health into global development strategies.
Key Themes Include (but are not limited to):
• Mental Health and Overall Health and Well-Being: Exploring mental health as a core component of health and well-being, including the integration of mental health services into primary healthcare.
• Educational Outcomes and Mental Health: Investigating the effects of mental health on learning, school attendance, and academic performance, and vice versa.
• Gender Equality and Mental Health: Examining the mental health implications of gender disparities, violence, and empowerment.
• Climate Change and Mental Health: Assessing the psychological impacts of climate-related events and the role of mental health in building climate resilience.
• Mental Health Inequities and SDG Progress: Exploring how disparities in access to mental health care affect progress on the SDGs, especially for marginalized groups.
• Resilience and Sustainable Development: Identifying protective factors and community-based strategies that enhance mental health and promote sustainable development.
• Digital Innovations and Mental Health in SDG Achievement: Evaluating the role of technology in addressing mental health challenges within development contexts.
• Mental Health Policy and the SDGs: Analyzing policies that integrate mental health into national and international development agendas.
• Youth Mental Health and SDGs: Investigating the intersection of youth mental health with education, employment, and civic participation.
• Intersectionality in Mental Health and SDGs: Exploring how intersecting identities (e.g., age, gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity) influence mental health outcomes and development goals.
Keywords: Mental Health and Sustainable Development Goals; Global Mental Health and SDGs; Mental Health Equity; Climate and Mental Health; Resilience and Well-being; Mental Health Policy and Advocacy; Education and Mental Health; Gender and Mental Health; Vulnerable Populations; Interdisciplinary Development and Mental Health.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to all the SDGs.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jun 30, 2026
Psychological Capacities for Mental Health and Wellbeing in the Era of Climate Change and Covid-19 Aftermath
The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly altered the way we live, work and socialise and continues to impact global mental health and wellbeing. Post the COVID 19 pandemic, and in the context of increasing environmental disasters due to climate change, there is a growing importance to be prepared and effectively deal with future adversities and threats. In this respect, understanding aspects of positive psychological capacities that can access and develop individual and community strengths are gaining importance. There is a growing body of evidence from positive psychology on a broader set of positive attributes/ resources such as self-efficacy, resilience, hope, optimism, sense of coherence, autonomy, resourcefulness, identity, hope, religiosity/spirituality and life valuation as critical indicators of mental health and wellbeing.
Positive psychology has inspired many fields of research including education, health, workplace and sports, to better capture strengths and capacities that can be measured and developed to improve, health, wellbeing and productivity. However, a significant pitfall of this research has been in discipline silos, published in discipline specific journals with limited access to researchers from other fields, impairing cross-disciplinary learnings across fields. For example, empirical evidence from the field of positive organisation behaviour has suggested psychological capital (PsyCap) as an higher-order construct that includes hope, self-efficacy, resilience and optimism to be associated with workplace burnout, wellbeing and satisfaction.
This collection will provide a platform for researcher across the field of education, health and workplace to publish articles related to measuring and developing psychological capacities to improve mental health and wellbeing. This collection aims to promote exchange of ideas and knowledge between disciplines to better understand, measure and develop psychological capacities to successfully address mental health concerns and wellbeing in the era of climate change and the COVID-19 aftermath.
Keywords: Psychological capacities, Resilience, Positive Psychology, Mental health and Wellbeing.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jun 30, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in