Very old patients need palliative care,not intensive care - an empirical and normative analysis
Published in Mechanical Engineering and Philosophy & Religion
We found clear and consistent evidence – both quantitative and qualitative – that high chronological age is a key factor against ICU admission. Among all the variables we compared, only being 80 years or older clearly stood out as linked to not being admitted to intensive care.
Across every data source, high age kept reappearing as a justification for non-admission. In medical records, “considering age” was mentioned again and again. In the COVID Rounds, Moral Case Deliberations (structured reflections on ethically complex patient cases), and follow-up interviews, the phrase “very old” was used repeatedly when decisions were discussed.
Another powerful justification across all data was about not harming the patient. This included avoiding unworthy suffering, not subjecting patients to what was described as torture when ICU care offered no benefit and recognising ventilator treatment as risky. For patients over 80, ICU care was often described as unacceptable; at 90, death was seen as a natural event. One ICU consultant put it poignantly:
“Ninety feels like, if you’ve had a good life and you’re spry and healthy ... if you die suddenly, then it’s expected. And better than dragging to the ICU and tormenting the person.”
Interestingly, few justifications were directly linked to the pandemic. The patterns we found mirror those from pre-COVID studies, suggesting that what we captured ordinary clinical decision-making, not crisis-specific thinking.
Normative discussion
When discussing chronological age as a factor, our findings align with two key ethical principles: non-maleficence and justice.
Non-maleficence implies here sparing patients from unnecessary suffering and loss of dignity. Distributive justice connects with the ICU prioritisation literature, which tends to exclude patients “with a fuller lifecycle.” In intensive care, defining what counts as a need becomes crucial.
According to Swedish legislation, healthcare needs are defined by both the severity of a condition and the potential benefit of treatment. For very old patients, with higher ICU mortality and poorer recovery rates, the potential benefit is often limited. From this perspective, ICU care may not truly meet very old patients’ needs.
Following the legal principle of Need and Solidarity, treatment should only be prioritised when there is potential for benefit. Our results therefore suggest that many very old patients are better served by palliative rather than intensive care.
A call for courage and clarity
We believe it is time for a national – and perhaps international – guiding policy on triage systems for very old patients in everyday care. Such a policy should be developed with courage and transparency, openly supporting a palliative approach for the very old.
Follow the Topic
-
BMC Medical Ethics
This journal is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Ethical challenges in nursing practice
The nursing profession is inherently linked to a range of ethical dilemmas that practitioners face in their daily work. As healthcare evolves and becomes more complex, nurses are often at the forefront of navigating these ethical challenges, which include issues related to patient autonomy, informed consent, boundary ethics, and cultural sensitivity. Addressing ethical challenges in nursing practice is vital for ensuring high-quality patient care and fostering a trusting therapeutic relationship between nurses and their patients. Recent advancements in nursing ethics have highlighted the significance of incorporating ethical frameworks into nursing education and practice, thereby equipping practitioners with the tools needed to navigate complex ethical scenarios.
BMC Medical Ethics is calling for submissions to our Collection on Ethical challenges in nursing practice. This Collection seeks to address the multifaceted ethical considerations that arise within nursing practice, emphasizing the importance of ethical reflection and communication as nurses advocate for their patients' needs and rights. Key topics of interest for submission include, but are not limited to:
Nursing advocacy and patient rights
Consent in care: ethical considerations
Boundary ethics in nursing practice
Cultural sensitivity in patient care
Ethical communication and patient prioritization
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 4: Quality Education.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jan 31, 2026
Ethical AI in healthcare
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is becoming more prevalent in medical practice and diagnostics; however, this rapid advancement raises critical ethical questions surrounding the governance of AI. Issues such as algorithmic bias, patient privacy, and transparency of machine learning models are at the forefront of this discussion.
Recent advancements have highlighted the potential for AI to improve patient outcomes through enhanced diagnostics and personalized treatment plans. However, these benefits must be balanced against risks such as data security breaches and the perpetuation of existing biases in healthcare systems. With human-AI relationship continually developing, any risks, such as clinicians failing to detect errors in LLM-generated notes—potentially leading to patient harm—arise from human factors rather than the technology itself. This highlights the need for broader ethical considerations beyond the AI tool to facilitate its integration into clinical practice.
With the inevitable integration of AI into healthcare, the continued dialogue on AI ethics is necessary to shape guidelines that safeguard patient safety and uphold the principles of equity and justice in healthcare.
BMC Medical Ethics is calling for submissions to our Collection, Ethical AI in healthcare. Key topics of interest for submission include, but are not limited to:
Addressing clinical bias in healthcare algorithms
Patient privacy and data security in AI applications
Ethical implications of healthcare automation related to real-time use of AI applications
Transparency in machine learning for clinical settings
Ethical issues arising from the sociotechnical context of AI use
Ethics around the environmental implications of AI use, with respect to human health
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Nov 27, 2025
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in