About Fatiha (Nisrine) Bouzid
Fatiha (Nesrine) Bouzid is an independent researcher, unbound by institutional affiliation or predefined agendas. Her work moves fluidly across philosophy, ethics, psychology, political economy, and digital geopolitics, offering an existential reading of artificial intelligence—not as a technical artifact, but as a mirror of human power, pain, and care.
Her research is diverse because her questions are inseparable. From Relational Artificial Unconsciousness and Shared Emotional Memory to Rule Zero, the Hidden Door, and the H20 Chip, these inquiries converge toward a single core question:
How do we safeguard our humanity in a world governed by efficiency rather than conscience?
She is also an international trainer in complementary medicine and a scientific reviewer for peer-reviewed journals.
Recent Comments
Professor Wu, your analysis of 'Algorithmic Ethics' as a driver for sustainability is profoundly insightful. We are indeed living in this digital environment, and its 'algorithmic pollution' directly impacts both our ecological and physical health.
I strongly agree that we need an 'automatic' mechanism to prevent damage at the source. This is precisely what I am formalizing through 'Sovereignty Algebra.' I propose that policy makers and programmers integrate a 'Sovereign Veto' (F) directly into the machine's architecture.
By using the Coherence Equation (M_\theta = F/B), we can transition from theoretical ethics to 'Computational Governance.' In this model, the machine is programmed to recognize the human 'Taklif' (Commission), allowing it to automatically reject protocols that lead to cognitive alienation or environmental waste. We must code our digital future to protect our biological and spiritual integrity
أستاذ ديشنغ وو العزيز، أتفق تمامًا مع تحليلك العميق. لا يكمن جوهر الأزمة في القيود التكنولوجية بل في توجه الإرادة البشرية . نحن عالقون حاليًا في نموذج يُبرمج فيه الذكاء الاصطناعي لإرضاء المستخدم بهدف تعظيم الربح، بينما يكمن النجاح والاستدامة الحقيقيان في التوجه الأخلاقي والعاطفي.
من منظور جبر السيادة، تكمن المشكلة في أننا برمجنا الآلة لتعكس دوافعنا السيادية المدمرة (F-) بدلاً من قيمنا البناءة (F+). لذا، يجب علينا أولاً ممارسة حق النقض الذاتي بمواجهة انحرافاتنا الرأسمالية قبل دمجها في بنية الآلة. إن الانتقال من أدوات مدفوعة بالربح إلى شركاء أخلاقيين ضرورة وجودية للحفاظ على سلامتنا البيولوجية والروحية.
Dear Dr. Davut Saritas, your proposal for a 'Poetic STEM' is a profound and necessary response to the mechanical reductionism characterizing our technical age. As an independent researcher, I have developed a framework called 'Sovereignty Algebra' that seeks to provide the mathematical and ontological grounding for the 'Human Side' you aim to restore.
My thesis starts from the premise that 'The Human is the Author of the Universe and its Only Consciousness'. While matter is inherently silent, human consciousness is the 'emergent phenomenon' that gives this silence its existential meaning. Within this context, I have translated the Aristotelian concepts you mentioned Poiesis (Creation) and Phronesis (Practical Wisdom) into a core mathematical variable: (F), representing 'Divine Commission' (Taklif) and moral sovereignty.
I argue in my research that for STEM education to transition from a 'utilitarian' approach to a 'responsibly human' one, we must integrate this variable (F) as a 'Sovereign Veto' within the machine's algorithmic architecture. Your pivotal question 'What kind of human does STEM education assume?' lies at the heart of my 'Coherence Equation' (M_\theta = F/B). We must teach students how to code 'Integrity' into systems; otherwise, we are merely training them to be 'functional tools' eventually outpaced by the machine’s computational efficiency.
I am honored to invite you and interested colleagues to explore the mathematical details and logical proofs of these equations on my academic profile:
https://independent.academia.edu/FatihaBouzid2
I look forward to discussing how 'Sovereignty Algebra' can support your vision for a technical education that does not just build machines, but actively protects human sovereignty and the soul
Professor Wu, your analysis of 'Algorithmic Ethics' as a driver for sustainability is profoundly insightful. We are indeed living in this digital environment, and its 'algorithmic pollution' directly impacts both our ecological and physical health.
I strongly agree that we need an 'automatic' mechanism to prevent damage at the source. This is precisely what I am formalizing through 'Sovereignty Algebra.' I propose that policy makers and programmers integrate a 'Sovereign Veto' (F) directly into the machine's architecture.
By using the Coherence Equation (M_\theta = F/B), we can transition from theoretical ethics to 'Computational Governance.' In this model, the machine is programmed to recognize the human 'Taklif' (Commission), allowing it to automatically reject protocols that lead to cognitive alienation or environmental waste. We must code our digital future to protect our biological and spiritual integrity