Assessment of guided lateral maxillary sinus lift procedure with simultaneous implant placement using stereolithographic surgical guide: a randomized controlled clinical study

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the stereolithographic surgical guide in reducing intraoperative and postoperative complication during lateral sinus lift operation.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Assessment of guided lateral maxillary sinus lift procedure with simultaneous implant placement using stereolithographic surgical guide: a randomized controlled clinical study - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Aim The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the stereolithographic surgical guide in reducing intraoperative and postoperative complication during lateral sinus lift operation. Materials and methods A parallel randomized controlled prospective clinical study was conducted on fourteen patients requiring thirty dental implants in the posterior maxilla and diagnosed with reduced vertical bone height. Lateral Maxillary Sinus Lift procedure with simultaneous implant placement was performed to all patients. Stereolithographic surgical guides for lateral window osteotomy and implant drilling and placement were used in the study group, while lateral osteotomy and implant drilling and placement was done freehand in the control group. A cone beam computed tomography was taken immediately and six months post-sinus lifting. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were assessed, pain and edema were assessed using visual analogue scale and vertical bone was assessed using fusion module of cone beam computed tomography. Results All dental implants demonstrated high survival rates with no statistically significant difference observed in intraoperative or postoperative complications. In terms of new vertical bone gain, both groups exhibited satisfactory and successful outcomes. Concerning pain, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups except after two days, the study group showed statistically significantly lower pain score than the control group. While regarding the severity of edema, the study group showed statistically significantly higher prevalence of moderate and severe edema than control group which showed higher prevalence of mild edema. Conclusion According to the current study it has been concluded that there was no remarkable difference between the outcomes of both methods. The study protocol and its consent form were approved by the ethical committee of Suez Canal University (No.432/2021); and registered retrospectively on 23 April 2024 on PACTR (PACTR20240875463218) (pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID = 30442).

Abstract


Aim The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the stereolithographic surgical guide in reducing intraoperative and postoperative complication during lateral sinus lift operation.
Materials and methods A parallel randomized controlled prospective clinical study was conducted on fourteen patients requiring thirty dental implants in the posterior maxilla and diagnosed with reduced vertical bone height. Lateral Maxillary Sinus Lift procedure with simultaneous implant placement was performed to all patients. Stereolithographic surgical guides for lateral window osteotomy and implant drilling and placement were used in the study group, while lateral osteotomy and implant drilling and placement was done freehand in the control group. A cone beam computed tomography was taken immediately and six months post-sinus lifting. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were assessed, pain and edema were assessed using visual analogue scale and vertical bone was assessed using fusion module of cone beam computed tomography.


Results

All dental implants demonstrated high survival rates with no statistically significant difference observed in intraoperative or postoperative complications. In terms of new vertical bone gain, both groups exhibited satisfactory and successful outcomes. Concerning pain, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups except after two days, the study group showed statistically significantly lower pain score than the control group. While regarding the severity of edema, the study group showed statistically significantly higher prevalence of moderate and severe edema than control group which showed higher prevalence of mild edema.


Conclusion

According to the current study it has been concluded that there was no remarkable difference between the out-comes of both methods.


The study protocol and its consent form were approved by the ethical committee of Suez Canal University (No.432/2021); and registered retrospectively on 23 April 2024 on PACTR (PACTR20240875463218) (pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.
aspx?TrialID=30442).

Link to full article: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10006-025-01399-3

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Dental Implant
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Dentistry > Dental Treatments > Dental Implant
Oral Surgery
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Dentistry > Dental Treatments > Oral Surgery

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Current State and Future Opportunities for 3D Printing/Additive Manufacturing in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: from Basic Science to Clinical Applications

Three-dimensional (3D) printing, also known as additive manufacturing, has emerged as a transformative technology in oral and maxillofacial surgery. It offers unprecedented precision and customization in the fabrication of patient-specific anatomical models, surgical guides, and implants. This not only enhances preoperative planning and intraoperative accuracy but also significantly reduces surgical time and improves postoperative outcomes, as surgeons can now visualize complex craniofacial structures in tangible form, simulate procedures, and tailor interventions to the unique anatomical and functional needs of each patient. It minimizes risks and optimizes aesthetic and functional results, especially in cases involving congenital deformities, trauma reconstruction, oncologic resections, and orthognathic surgery, where traditional methods often fall short in achieving ideal fit and alignment. The integration of biocompatible materials and advances in digital imaging and computer-aided design (CAD) further expand the scope of 3D printing applications, enabling the production of implants that conform precisely to bone contours and support tissue regeneration. As this technology continues to evolve, with ongoing research into bio-printing and the use of stem cells and growth factors, the potential for creating living tissue constructs and fully functional bone grafts becomes increasingly feasible, promising a future where personalized, regenerative solutions become standard practice in maxillofacial care. Although challenges remain in terms of regulatory approval, cost-effectiveness, and widespread clinical adoption, the growing body of evidence supporting its efficacy and safety underscores the importance of continually educating practitioners on the latest developments in the subject to enable informed decision-making and ultimately, improved patient outcomes.

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Ongoing