Attitudes and Practice of Health Care Providers Toward Cancer Screening: A Cross‑sectional Multicenter Study, Saudi Arabia
Published in Healthcare & Nursing, Cancer, and Public Health
By 2030, the number of cancer cases worldwide is estimated to increase to 21.4 million deaths due to changes in population demographics. Improved survival can be achieved through cancer prevention and early detection strategies. Accordingly, the new generation may have lower rates of cancer in adulthood than previous generations. Achieving this goal requires a more interdisciplinary and multifaceted approach, with multiple public and clinical health efforts required to build a sustainable infrastructure for the dissemination of cancer prevention interventions.
Recognizing the vital role of health care providers (HCPs) as the most valuable resource for health is fundamental to maintaining public health. At the same time, HCPs must be in good health to treat and care for patients. Although HCPs are constantly exposed to a wide range of health and safety hazards while maintaining the health of the population as a whole, they are not at lower risk of noncommunicable diseases such as cancer.
According to the latest data for 2020, there were an estimated 23,782.8 to 66,899.8 new cases of cancer in Saudi Arabia. The death rate from cancer was estimated at 13,069, with colorectal cancer, lung cancer, and breast cancer being the leading causes. Although there is significant research on overall cancer incidence and prevalence in Saudi Arabia, there is a lack of data on the perceptions and attitudes of health care providers regarding their decision to undergo cancer screening. Therefore, we aimed to assess the perceptions and personal attitudes of n = 372 HCPs regarding their decision to undergo cancer screening.
We found that regardless of gender, occupation or age, the overall level of belief in the protective value of regular cancer screening was high at 91.4%. However, only 3.5% of participants had undergone colonoscopy and only 15.9% of women had undergone mammography, while the percentage of men who had undergone prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening was 12.4%. At the same time, we found that the number of women in the 45-54 age group who were screened with mammography was significantly higher than those who were not screened. Similarly, the number of male physicians over 54 years who were screened for PSA was significantly higher than those who were not.
The most common reason respondents cited that influenced their decision to undergo cancer screening was the lack of knowledge. The second most common reason that participants cited that influenced their decision to undergo screening was worry and anxiety about receiving positive results. Therefore, educational programs are recommended, especially among physicians, as they can further inform their patients about cancer risk factors, the importance of cancer screening, and the differences between screening methods.
The results of the current study and the available evidence specifically regarding the Saudi community indicate a need for awareness raising, emphasizing the role of HCPs in motivating themselves, their families and their patients to implement various cancer screening programs. This could be achieved through further research into additional education or training required for HCPs, which could positively influence their attitude towards cancer screening by making the procedure part of their own routine medical check-up.
Follow the Topic
-
Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health
The journal aims to impact global epidemiology and international health with articles focused on innovative scholarship and strategies to advance global health policy.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Infectious disease outbreak in conflict-driven displacement: challenges, responses and future
Infectious disease outbreaks are increasingly entwined with conflict, forced displacement, and fragile health systems. In recent years, cholera in Yemen, measles among displaced Rohingya, and COVID-19 in Syrian camps have revealed how conflict-driven migration and humanitarian crises amplify the risks of large-scale epidemics.
Overcrowding, collapsing health infrastructure, disrupted supply chains, rise of anti microbial resistance (AMR) and constrained access to care create fertile conditions for rapid transmission, particularly among migrants and refugees.
Despite growing recognition of these intertwined vulnerabilities, evidence remains fragmented, and the operational and policy frameworks required to mitigate these crises are often reactive rather than anticipatory. This collection aims to consolidate case studies, field data, and solutions to better understand, prepare for, and respond to infectious disease outbreaks among displaced populations in conflict-affected settings.
Key Topics
1. Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases in Conflict Settings:
• Burden and patterns of infectious diseases (e.g., cholera, tuberculosis, malaria, measles, and respiratory infections) in conflict-driven displacement.
•Transmission dynamics in over-crowded camps, urban conflict settings, and transit corridors.
•Impact of armed conflict and forced displacement on AMR dynamics.
•Case studies from acute and protracted conflicts (e.g., Syria, Yemen, Sudan, and Central African Republic).
2. Vulnerabilities of Forcibly Displaced Populations:
•Health disparities caused by malnutrition, poor sanitation, and disrupted care.
•Gender, age, and disability-related vulnerabilities in accessing health services.
•Access to care barriers due to security risks, mobility, legal status, and cultural challenges.
3. Health System Collapse and Humanitarian Responses:
•Impacts of weakened health infrastructure, fragmented governance, and security constraints on disease control.
•Strategies for disease surveillance, vaccination campaigns, and WASH interventions in volatile environments.
•Innovations in service delivery: mobile clinics, telemedicine, and community-led response models.
•Role of local actors and international humanitarian organizations in outbreak response.
4. Policy, Law and Future Preparedness
•Intersection of human rights law, refugee law, and international health regulations in managing outbreaks.
•Challenges in cross-border coordination, governance, and resource mobilization.
•Policy recommendations for anticipatory action and resilient health security systems in conflict and displacement settings.
All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jun 26, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in