Behind the Paper: Hepatitis B discrimination: global responses requiring global data
Published in Social Sciences, Microbiology, and General & Internal Medicine
Explore the research:
Over 250 million people worldwide live with chronic hepatitis B, yet most remain undiagnosed and at risk for liver disease. Improving testing, linkage to care, and access to treatment is essential to reduce the burden of hepatitis B and achieve global elimination goals. As countries continue efforts to improve diagnosis and care, it is equally important to understand the psychological and social consequences of a hepatitis B diagnosis—particularly the impact of stigma and discrimination.
Discrimination related to hepatitis B is defined as unjust, unfair, or prejudicial treatment based on a person’s hepatitis B status. Stigma, on the other hand, is a social process—either experienced or anticipated—characterized by exclusion, rejection, blame, or devaluation resulting from perceived or expected negative social judgment.
To better understand and document these issues, this study explores the lived experiences of people with hepatitis B around the world. It focuses on the types, contexts, settings, and locations of discrimination, as well as the impact such experiences have on individuals and efforts to eliminate hepatitis B.
What inspired this study?
The Hepatitis B Foundation operates a consultation line where individuals with lived experience, as well as their family members and caregivers, can ask questions and share their stories. Between 2019 and 2021, the Foundation began receiving a growing number of reports of discrimination from individuals living with hepatitis B.
To better understand and address these concerns, the Foundation conducted stakeholder interviews with key opinion leaders and experts in the field. Based on insights from these conversations, researchers recognized the need to document and track experiences of discrimination more systematically and to develop advocacy recommendations for change.
In May 2021, the Foundation launched a discrimination registry to provide individuals affected by hepatitis B–related discrimination with a platform to share their experiences and access support resources. This study presents findings and insights gathered from the registry to inform ongoing advocacy and support efforts.
Why is it important?
This study is the largest collection to date of hepatitis B–related discrimination experiences, revealing that such discrimination is a global issue occurring in employment, education, healthcare, and personal relationships. In countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, premarital hepatitis B screening often results in rejected marriage prospects and social exclusion, underscoring how deeply rooted this stigma can be.
Many individuals reported being tested without consent and denied opportunities to work, study, or form relationships—leading to emotional distress, social isolation, and poorer health outcomes. Discrimination also creates economic barriers, forcing individuals to prioritize survival over care and treatment.
A major driver of this discrimination is a widespread lack of knowledge about hepatitis B, even among healthcare providers. Misinformation about transmission and disease progression fuels fear and stigma, highlighting the urgent need for education at both the community and professional levels.
While some countries have anti-discrimination policies, enforcement is inconsistent. As global testing efforts expand to meet hepatitis B elimination goals, there is a critical ethical need to ensure protective measures are in place.
This research underscores the need for stronger policies, education, and supportive services to protect people living with hepatitis B and help them lead full, healthy lives free from discrimination.
What makes this study unique?
This study is unique in that it captures lived experiences of hepatitis B–related discrimination from a global perspective. Patient-reported outcomes—particularly stigma and discrimination—are often overlooked in discussions about hepatitis B. Understanding these personal experiences is essential to developing effective protections, reducing the negative consequences of discrimination, and supporting those affected by the disease.
What is the wider significance of the study findings?
As we approach World Hepatitis Day this year (July 28, 2025), it is important to acknowledge the impact that hepatitis B has globally and account for programming that involves those with lived experience to improve outcomes. Efforts should prioritize mitigating the negative consequences associated with infection and work towards developing public health interventions that address stigma and discrimination including policy measures that prevent discrimination from occurring.
References:
- Hepatitis B Foundation Discrimination Registry. https://www.hepb.org/resources-and-support/hepatitis-b-foundations-discrimination-registry/
- Freeland, C., Qureshi, A., Wallace, J. et al.Hepatitis B discrimination: global responses requiring global data. BMC Public Health 24, 1575 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18918-8
- Freeland C, Mendola L, Cheng V, Cohen C, Wallace J. The unvirtuous cycle of discrimination affecting people with hepatitis B: a multi-country qualitative assessment of key-informant perspectives. Int J Equity Health. 2022;21(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01677-6.
- Tu T, Block JM, Wang S, Cohen C, Douglas MW. The lived experience of chronic hepatitis B: a broader view of its impacts and why we need a cure. Viruses. 2020;12(5):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12050515.
Follow the Topic
-
BMC Public Health
An open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Endocrine disruption as a public health issue
BMC Public Health invites submissions to our new Collection, Endocrine disruption as a public health issue. Endocrine disruption has emerged as a growing public health challenge, characterized by the interference of certain chemicals with the normal functioning of the endocrine system. Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can mimic, block, or alter hormone signaling, leading to a range of adverse health outcomes. Common sources of EDC exposure include everyday products such as plastics, pesticides, and personal care items, all of which can release substances like bisphenols and phthalates into the environment and human body. Understanding the links between exposure to EDCs and eventual health outcomes is vital for assessing their implications for population health.
We welcome submissions that delve into various aspects of endocrine disruption. Key topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
Role of EDCs in metabolic, endocrine and immune-related disorders
Effect of EDCs in consumer products including personal care products
The links between EDC exposure and male and female reproductive health problems
The links between EDC exposure and certain cancers
Insights into the long-term consequences of early-life EDC exposure and transgenerational effects
Methodological advances in assessing the health impacts of EDC mixtures and cumulative exposures
Development and application of statistical approaches to better estimate the health effects of chronic and/or concurrent exposure
Validating models of cumulative exposure with measurement of combinations of EDCs in human tissues
Individual- and policy-level interventions to address health impacts of EDC exposures
The search for substitutes lacking endocrine disrupting properties
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Feb 26, 2026
Male reproductive health
BMC Public Health invites submissions to our new Collection, "Male reproductive health”. Male reproductive health is an essential yet often overlooked aspect of public health that encompasses various factors affecting men's fertility and overall well-being. Issues such as declining sperm counts, poor sperm quality, the impact of environmental exposures and the effects of lifestyle and dietary factors on reproductive outcomes are gaining increasing attention.
This Collection seeks to examine the multifaceted influences on male reproductive health, considering environmental, infectious and sociocultural dimensions that affect male reproductive parameters and contribute to fertility challenges. Continued research in this area could help identify causative factors and contribute to advances in public health policies, ultimately benefiting future generations.
Key topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
Environmental pollution and reproductive health
Sperm count trends and implications for fertility
The role of occupational exposures in male fertility
The effects of infectious diseases on sperm parameters
Impact of diet and lifestyle factors on sperm quality and fertility
Psychological factors influencing reproductive health
Interventions for improving male reproductive health
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to Sustainable Development Goal 3- Good Health and Well-Being.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Dec 27, 2025
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in