Digital Learning in Healthcare Service Delivery

The best learning method provides access to the most relevant and practical information in the shortest possible time. We have been working to introduce an accepted digital method to improve the quality of nurses' learning in the appropriate and correct use of medical devices.

Published in Healthcare & Nursing and Education

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Adoption of quick response codes as a digital microlearning tool among clinical nurses: a quasi-experimental study - BMC Medical Education

Background The rapid growth of technology forced enormous changes in the provision of healthcare services. Different strategies are used to keep nurses up to date with rapid changes in health systems. Microlearning is one of the new methods of teaching professional skills to health workers. This method is effective in care settings that have many limitations in terms of time and place. However, it is very important to test the acceptability of this method among nurses before practical measures are taken for its widespread use. This study aimed to determine nurses’ acceptance rate of quick response code as a microlearning tool in workplace. Method This is a cross-sectional study was conducted in medical and surgical wards in hospitals affiliated to Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 185 nurses participated in the study. A number of selected medical devices were labeled with quick response codes containing educational content. The eligible nurses were instructed how to use the QR codes. After two months, they were asked to complete a questionnaire adapted from the technology acceptance model 3. SPSS 21 software was used to analyze the data. Results 166 nurses and 19 head nurses with mean age of 34.26 ± 8.17 years and mean work experience of 10.46 ± 7.64 years completed the questionnaires. Most participants were female, married, with a bachelor’s degree, worked on rotating shifts, in medical wards. The findings showed that the acceptance of the quick response code as a learning tool was at a moderate level (M = 66.1, SD = 16.6). Statistically, there was no significant relationship between nurses’ demographic characteristics and the total acceptance rate (P > 0.05). However, the analyses at the multivariate level, using multiple linear regression, showed a significant superiority of the total acceptance score in head nurses compared to nurses (b = 7.97, P = 0.047) and in nurses who had previous experience of using quick response codes, compared to colleagues without such experience (b = 5.18, P = 0.036). Based on the coefficient of determination, only 6.1% of the changes in the total acceptance score of quick response codes of nurses are explained by their personal-occupational characteristics (R2 = 0.061). Conclusions The provision of QR code requirements such as necessary infrastructure and training by the health authorities could increase the acceptance of this tool as a microlearning measure.

QR codes have been used in various industries for many years, but their capabilities in education and learning have received less attention. As a technology that can create instant access to vast information, QR codes have significant potential for use in busy clinical environments. This rapid review could potentially prevent many errors by the healthcare team. Understanding the importance of using such a simple and low-cost technology, along with the high levels of stakeholder acceptance, can lead to a fundamental change in learning methods.
Our team's effort has been focused on assessing nurses' acceptance of using QR codes to learn how to operate medical devices, which you can read about. I eagerly await your feedback.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Medical Education
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Professional and Vocational Education > Medical Education
Nursing Education
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Nursing > Nursing Education
Nursing
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Nursing
  • BMC Medical Education BMC Medical Education

    This is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the education and training of healthcare professionals. It welcomes studies on students and professionals across all levels of education; education delivery aspects; and other education-related topics.

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Gamification and virtual reality in medical education and related healthcare professions - Part II

BMC Medical Education calls for submissions to our Collection, Gamification and virtual reality in medical education and healthcare professions - Part II. Fueled by the COVID-19 pandemic, digital teaching formats enhanced by interactive elements have received growing attention from higher education institutions worldwide. While the inclusion of game-based elements (‘gamification’) appears feasible in a number of contexts other than the healthcare sector, virtual reality appears to be especially appealing to medical educators. At the same time, given the potential cost, the use of gamification elements as well as sophisticated software and hardware in order to simulate clinical environments needs to be justified, particularly on the basis of concepts in learning psychology to suggest that these elements will be superior to traditional instructional formats or that they can help achieve learning outcomes that have not been covered in the past.

Most studies on gamification and virtual reality in medical education that have been published to date merely represent descriptions of innovations, and only a few present a thorough rationale for their use or present results of prospective, controlled effectiveness trials with meaningful endpoints (i.e., objective performance indicators linked to the intended learning outcomes). There is a lack of justification and clarification studies, and evaluations of innovations going beyond mere student satisfaction are needed. In order to be able to decide in favor or against the integration of game-based formats and virtual reality sessions in formal curricula, educators need to have access to original studies, reviews, and recommendations on when and how these elements should be employed.

Articles can cover the entire range of health-profession education, including but not limited to undergraduate and postgraduate medical education, nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, pharmacology, public health, and related fields.

Key themes include:

  • Application of concepts from learning psychology to medical education with a focus on gamification and/or virtual reality
  • Comparison of traditional instructional formats to innovative approaches including gamification and/or virtual reality with regard to meaningful educational outcomes
  • Cost-effectiveness assessments for innovative technology-based solutions compared to a traditional approach
  • Constructive alignment between intended learning outcomes, use of gamification and/or virtual reality elements, and formative/summative assessments.
  • Added value of gamification/virtual reality elements if used as a supplement to or as a replacement for traditional teaching; effects on curriculum structure and student workload
  • Sustainability of new technologies with regard to computing power and waste management of virtual reality devices

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jan 11, 2027

Palliative care education

BMC Medical Education is calling for submissions to our Collection, Palliative care education. Palliative care education is an essential component of healthcare training, aimed at equipping healthcare professionals with the knowledge and skills necessary to provide compassionate care to patients with serious illnesses. This field encompasses a wide range of topics, including pain management, communication skills, ethical considerations, and multidisciplinary approaches to care. As the global population ages and the prevalence of chronic diseases rises, the demand for effective palliative care has become increasingly critical. Educators and practitioners alike are called to address gaps in training and to ensure that future healthcare providers are well-prepared to support patients and families facing complex medical decisions.

The significance of advancing palliative care education lies in its potential to improve patient outcomes and enhance the quality of life for individuals facing life-limiting illnesses. Recent advancements in palliative care education have included the development of innovative curricula, integration of simulation-based learning, and an increased emphasis on interdisciplinary collaboration. By fostering a deeper understanding of palliative principles, we can empower healthcare professionals to deliver holistic, patient-centered care that addresses not only physical symptoms but also emotional, social, and spiritual needs. Topics to be addressed include but are not limited to:

Innovative curricula in palliative care

Simulation-based learning in medical education

Interdisciplinary approaches to palliative care

Evaluating the effectiveness of palliative care training

Ethical dilemmas in palliative care education

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 01, 2026