Digital Learning in Healthcare Service Delivery

The best learning method provides access to the most relevant and practical information in the shortest possible time. We have been working to introduce an accepted digital method to improve the quality of nurses' learning in the appropriate and correct use of medical devices.

Published in Healthcare & Nursing and Education

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Adoption of quick response codes as a digital microlearning tool among clinical nurses: a quasi-experimental study - BMC Medical Education

Background The rapid growth of technology forced enormous changes in the provision of healthcare services. Different strategies are used to keep nurses up to date with rapid changes in health systems. Microlearning is one of the new methods of teaching professional skills to health workers. This method is effective in care settings that have many limitations in terms of time and place. However, it is very important to test the acceptability of this method among nurses before practical measures are taken for its widespread use. This study aimed to determine nurses’ acceptance rate of quick response code as a microlearning tool in workplace. Method This is a cross-sectional study was conducted in medical and surgical wards in hospitals affiliated to Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 185 nurses participated in the study. A number of selected medical devices were labeled with quick response codes containing educational content. The eligible nurses were instructed how to use the QR codes. After two months, they were asked to complete a questionnaire adapted from the technology acceptance model 3. SPSS 21 software was used to analyze the data. Results 166 nurses and 19 head nurses with mean age of 34.26 ± 8.17 years and mean work experience of 10.46 ± 7.64 years completed the questionnaires. Most participants were female, married, with a bachelor’s degree, worked on rotating shifts, in medical wards. The findings showed that the acceptance of the quick response code as a learning tool was at a moderate level (M = 66.1, SD = 16.6). Statistically, there was no significant relationship between nurses’ demographic characteristics and the total acceptance rate (P > 0.05). However, the analyses at the multivariate level, using multiple linear regression, showed a significant superiority of the total acceptance score in head nurses compared to nurses (b = 7.97, P = 0.047) and in nurses who had previous experience of using quick response codes, compared to colleagues without such experience (b = 5.18, P = 0.036). Based on the coefficient of determination, only 6.1% of the changes in the total acceptance score of quick response codes of nurses are explained by their personal-occupational characteristics (R2 = 0.061). Conclusions The provision of QR code requirements such as necessary infrastructure and training by the health authorities could increase the acceptance of this tool as a microlearning measure.

QR codes have been used in various industries for many years, but their capabilities in education and learning have received less attention. As a technology that can create instant access to vast information, QR codes have significant potential for use in busy clinical environments. This rapid review could potentially prevent many errors by the healthcare team. Understanding the importance of using such a simple and low-cost technology, along with the high levels of stakeholder acceptance, can lead to a fundamental change in learning methods.
Our team's effort has been focused on assessing nurses' acceptance of using QR codes to learn how to operate medical devices, which you can read about. I eagerly await your feedback.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Medical Education
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Professional and Vocational Education > Medical Education
Nursing Education
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Nursing > Nursing Education
Nursing
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Nursing
  • BMC Medical Education BMC Medical Education

    This is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the education and training of healthcare professionals. It welcomes studies on students and professionals across all levels of education; education delivery aspects; and other education-related topics.

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Artificial intelligence in curriculum development and assessment

BMC Medical Education welcomes submissions to our Artificial intelligence (AI) in curriculum development and assessment Collection. The incorporation of AI technologies and methodologies into medical and allied health curricula and student assessment is not just a trend, but a crucial step towards improving program effectiveness and producing efficient and professional doctors and allied health professionals. This Collection aims to explore how AI is reshaping medical and allied health curricula, student training, and assessment, as well as the potential implications of these changes on healthcare services and patient wellbeing.

Research on AI in medical education is still in its early stages. However, there has been a marked increase in interest and activity in this area during 2023 and 2024. Still, the majority of existing publications are commentary articles, perspective pieces, letters to the editor, or editorials, rather than original research. This highlights the pressing need for rigorous research and systematic reviews on the application of AI in medical education. Additionally, most contributions come from countries such as the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, China, Singapore, Denmark, and Oman. In contrast, there is a significant underrepresentation of research output from regions including North Africa, the Middle East, South-East Asia, and South America.

This new Collection focuses specifically on curriculum development and student assessment, and researchers are encouraged to submit their work for consideration. Continued exploration in this domain has the potential to revolutionize medical education and, ultimately, enhance patient care worldwide. This reflects the transformative power of AI in shaping the future of medical training.

Submissions of innovative research contributing to this goal are invited. The scope of this Collection includes, but is not limited to, the following topics:

• Validity and reliability of AI in curriculum development

• AI applications in student selection and the allocation of medical and allied health graduates into specialties and subspecialties

• The use of AI in developing assessment questions and marking essay questions

• The potential of AI in marking OSCE examinations

• AI applications in providing performance feedback to students

• Critical assessment of AI-performed tasks in curriculum design and in student evaluation

• Validity and accuracy of AI-generated clinical cases

• Utilization of AI in faculty development and continuing medical education

• Students’ use of AI in learning environments

• Critical analysis of AI-generated responses and outputs

• Evaluation of published research on AI’s role in assessment and question design

Contributions are welcomed from a range of disciplines, including healthcare professionals, medical educators, social scientists, and computer scientists. The Collection also seeks submissions from fields such as dentistry, pharmacy, nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, psychology, midwifery, oral therapy, paramedicine, and optometry. The goal is to build a vibrant, interdisciplinary Collection that captures the latest developments and research on AI's impact in curriculum and assessment within medical and allied health education.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 4: Quality Education.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 02, 2026

Tools for assessment of medical skills

BMC Medical Education is calling for submissions to our Collection on Tools for assessment of medical skills. Effective assessment is essential for ensuring that future health professionals trainees develop the skills required for safe and competent practice. From objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and workplace-based assessments to simulation-based evaluations and real-time feedback methods, advancements in assessment tools are shaping the future of medical education. As medical training evolves, integrating reliable and valid professional evaluation techniques is crucial to fostering competency-based education and lifelong learning and ensuring optimal future professional performance.

We welcome research covering topics such as, but not limited to:

• Development and validation of novel assessment tools in medical education

• Technology-enhanced assessments, including artificial intelligence and virtual simulation

• Formative assessments and feedback methods to support skill acquisition

• Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and standardized patient assessments

• Workplace-based assessment strategies for clinical competency evaluation

• Best practices in professional evaluation for medical learners and educators

• Documentation of curricular innovations or integrations with a focus on assessment

This Collection seeks to advance the field of medical education by promoting evidence-based strategies for assessing and improving medical skills. By exploring innovative and practical approaches to evaluation, we can enhance both learning outcomes and patient care.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being and SDG 4: Quality Education.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 12, 2026