E- Learning experience of the medical profession’s college students during COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia

This study explored the e-learning experience of the students of the colleges of health sciences with regard to the technical preparedness, academic achievements, e-learning advantages and limitations.
Published in Education
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Read the paper

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

E- Learning experience of the medical profession’s college students during COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia - BMC Medical Education

Background Worldwide, most of educational institutions have moved to online electronic learning methods because of the COVID-19 pandemic. On March 8, 2020, the Saudi Ministry of Education announced remote learning for public and private schools and universities as a preventive and precautionary measure to curb the spread of the coronavirus. The objective of this study was to explore the e-learning experience of the students of the colleges of health sciences with regard to the technical preparedness, academic achievements, e-learning advantages and limitations. A well-structured and validated questionnaire on a five-point Likert scale and open-ended questions about their e-learning experience was distributed to a heterogeneous purposive sample of the health sciences students in Saudi Arabian universities. Results Of the 1288 respondents, of various demographical features a relatively higher proportion of 58.2 % agreed that they had enough information about the online learning. However, the proportion who reported receiving adequate guidance, technical support, and having satisfactory hardware and internet access to online learning were 48.1 %, 42, and 35.4 %, respectively. Of all participants, 40.8 % agreed that they had gained a good understanding of their courses learning outcomes. Only 30.0 % agreed that the quality of the online teaching was similar to traditional classes and 56.1 % agreed that the online learning is unsuitable for the medical sciences studies. E-learning advantages mentioned were the flexible accessibility of the learning materials, time, effort, and money saving, acquiring and improving technical and self-learning skills, health safety, interaction without shyness, and better academic accomplishment. On the other hand, disadvantages and difficulties included inadequate tools to facilitate online learning, poor internet connection, lack of technological skills by the educators and students. In addition, there was inadequate or lack of practical classes, lack of a unified clear policy for the conduct of online classes and exams and grade distribution, limited online exam time. Conclusions The sudden shift to e-learning without prior preparedness has revealed some pitfalls that need to be adjusted. The initial findings were considered satisfactory for such a new experience for both learners and students. However, there is a great chance for improving and expanding the e-learning process.

E-learning is a broad concept that includes the delivery of educational programs through electronic systems using Internet for teacher/student interactions and dissemination of learning materials. It involves the implementation of advanced technologies for planning, designing, and delivering learning content, and for facilitating two-way communication between teachers and students.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the closure of educational institutions across the world. As a result, educational institutions shifted to online methods, commonly referred to as e-learning as possible replacement for traditional face-to-face teaching. By March 2020, more than 107 countries implemented a nationwide e-learning system. Similarly, the Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia announced distance learning for public and private schools and universities as a preventive and precautionary measure to contain the spread of coronavirus.

It is well known that the success of an e-learning program depends largely on the learning tools and technical support available to users. E-learning standards for higher education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia were established in accordance with the most renowned international standards, which include technology, training and support, design, interaction, equity and accessibility, and assessment and evaluation. Each e-learning system established its basic foundation of computers, networks, communications and technical facilities, along with ICT specialists to continuously maintain and update the system, train users and provide technical support. Appropriate technological support and maintenance of available hardware and software were essential for the optimal use of technology by teachers and students. This study explored the e-learning experience of the students of the colleges of health sciences with regard to the technical preparedness, academic achievements, e-learning advantages and limitations. 

Out of 1288 respondents, 58.2% agreed that they had sufficient information about online learning. The advantages of e-learning were flexible access to learning materials, saving time, effort and money, acquiring and improving technical and self-learning skills, health safety, interacting without shyness and higher academic achievement. On the other hand, the disadvantages and challenges included inadequate tools to facilitate online learning, poor internet connection, lack of technology skills of teachers and students. In addition, there were insufficient or insufficient practical classes, lack of uniform clear policy for conducting online classes and examinations and distribution of marks, limited time for online examinations.

The proportion of those who reported receiving adequate guidance, technical support, and having satisfactory equipment and internet access for online learning were 48.1%, 42%, and 35.4%, respectively. Of all the participants, 40.8% agreed that they had a good understanding of the learning outcomes of their courses. Only 30.0% agreed that the quality of online learning was similar to traditional classes, and 56.1% agreed that online learning was not suitable for learning health sciences. The study found that a relatively high proportion of respondents, 58.2%, agreed that they had sufficient information about the e-learning platform. However, less than 50% of the total participants agreed that they had received adequate guidance and technical support during the e-learning process. Personal equipment and internet access were rated as satisfactory for the learning process by 35.5% in the current study, compared to 44.1% who rated them as unsatisfactory. Most of the respondents to the study agreed that easily accessible online learning materials for all courses were provided in a timely manner during the study period. It was stated that the success of the online education program was due to the provision of adequate levels of educational guidance and technical support.

Most students disagreed with the effectiveness of virtual practicals as a substitute for real laboratory training. It was recommended that a mixed learning strategy that includes face-to-face laboratory training was more appropriate. Virtual labs and video labs were the best choice when students were not physically on campus. It was stated that online learning and laboratory practice in biological sciences were often more effective than traditional teaching.

A significant proportion of participants in the current study considered e-learning to be a stressful experience. Anxiety and stress related to the pandemic were listed among the concerns. Most of the students in this study stated that they would not want to attend more e-learning classes if given the option. Stress was more often associated with e-learning than with traditional learning. Increased concerns about academic performance had previously been identified as stressors contributing to increased levels of stress, anxiety, and depressive thoughts among students due to the COVID-19 pandemic situation.

Several suggestions were mentioned to improve the e-learning process. These included the use of mixed learning strategies that include face-to-face practical/clinical teaching. Other suggestions included technical training of staff and students, greater use of visual learning materials, more time for multiple-attempt exams, having an exam policy during internet disconnection, using an effective system that detects and prevents cheating, and encouraging active interaction between the instructor and students.  The cumulative data of this study and international evidence from the pandemic years show that more scientific evidence is still needed to clearly compare online and traditional teaching.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Higher Education
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Higher Education
Medical Education
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Professional and Vocational Education > Medical Education
  • BMC Medical Education BMC Medical Education

    This is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the education and training of healthcare professionals. It welcomes studies on students and professionals across all levels of education; education delivery aspects; and other education-related topics.

Related Collections

With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Dental education

BMC Medical Education is calling for submissions to our Collection on Dental education. Dental education is a vital component of healthcare, shaping the skills and competencies of future dental professionals. As the field of dentistry evolves, so too must the educational frameworks that prepare students for the challenges they will face in practice. Innovations in technology, changes in patient demographics, and advancements in treatment modalities necessitate a re-evaluation of dental curricula. Furthermore, the integration of interprofessional education and a focus on holistic patient care are becoming increasingly important in training competent and compassionate dental practitioners.

Advancing our collective understanding of dental education is crucial for ensuring that future dentists are equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to provide high-quality care. Recent advances in this area include the incorporation of simulation-based learning, the use of digital tools for assessment, and the emphasis on evidence-based practice. These developments have enhanced the learning experience and improved clinical outcomes. However, ongoing research is needed to explore best practices, address disparities in education, and adapt to the rapidly changing landscape of healthcare.

Looking ahead, continued research in dental education may lead to the development of more personalized learning pathways, enhanced use of artificial intelligence in training, and greater emphasis on lifelong learning and professional development. As we embrace these innovations, we can expect to see a more adaptable and responsive dental workforce that meets the evolving needs of society.

Key topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

Innovations in teaching and learning: How are emerging technologies such as simulation, virtual reality, and AI being integrated into dental curricula? What new pedagogical strategies can enhance student engagement and mastery of complex clinical skills?

Interdisciplinary approaches: The growing understanding of oral health’s connection to systemic health has emphasized the need for collaborative approaches. How can dental education better prepare students for integrated, team-based care alongside other healthcare professionals?

Global perspectives on dental education: What lessons can be drawn from the varied educational approaches across different regions? How can best practices be shared to create a more globally consistent standard of dental education while respecting local needs and cultural contexts?

Addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion: How can dental schools foster a more diverse student body and faculty, ensuring an inclusive environment that prepares practitioners to meet the oral health needs of diverse populations? What efforts are being made to bridge gaps in access to dental education?

Responding to changing patient demographics and needs: As patient populations age and societal expectations evolve, what changes in dental training are necessary to equip practitioners to meet these emerging challenges, from managing geriatric care to addressing dental anxiety?

Assessment and competency evaluation: In an era of competency-based education, how should we rethink traditional assessments in dental education? What methods best evaluate both clinical proficiency and professional competencies, such as communication and ethical decision-making?

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 4: Quality Education.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Aug 12, 2025

Surgical training

BMC Medical Education is calling for submissions to its Collection on Surgical training.

The landscape of surgical education is constantly evolving, influenced by technological advancements, changes in healthcare delivery, and the need for standardized, high-quality training programs. In particular, the integration of simulation-based training, advancements in virtual reality, and the emphasis on interprofessional education are reshaping the way surgical training is approached.

Significant progress has been made in the development and validation of simulation-based training curricula, the integration of competency-based assessments, and the utilization of telementoring for remote guidance. Furthermore, recent research has highlighted the importance of addressing the psychomotor and non-technical skills of surgical trainees to enhance patient safety and outcomes. With continued investigation, we anticipate the further integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in surgical simulation, the expansion of telesimulation for global surgical education, and the development of personalized learning pathways tailored to individual trainees' needs.

We are particularly interested in contributions that explore innovative educational methodologies, including but not limited to:

Simulation-based training: Investigations into the effectiveness of virtual reality, augmented reality, and other simulation technologies in enhancing surgical skills and knowledge.

Curriculum development: Studies on the creation and implementation of curricula that meet the evolving needs of surgical trainees and address contemporary healthcare challenges.

Assessment and evaluation: Research focused on new methods of assessing surgical competencies, including formative and summative assessments, and the use of objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs).

Interdisciplinary approaches: Papers that examine the integration of interprofessional education within surgical training, highlighting collaborative practices between surgeons, anesthetists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals.

Global perspectives: Contributions that provide insights into surgical education practices from around the world, especially those addressing disparities in surgical training and access to resources.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 4: Quality Education.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jun 13, 2025