Ecological Damage of the War in Ukraine

Our research team evaluates effects of the Russia-Ukraine War (2022-present) on biodiversity and aquatic habitats in the northern Black Sea region from field studies, with both negative and positive findings.
Ecological Damage of the War in Ukraine
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Biodiversity effects of the Russia–Ukraine War and the Kakhovka Dam destruction: ecological consequences and predictions for marine, estuarine, and freshwater communities in the northern Black Sea - Ecological Processes

Background The effects of war on biodiversity, habitats, ecosystem services, and water, seafood, and fishing resources are complex and long-lasting, yet their ongoing environmental analyses are limited. The Russia–Ukraine War (2022–present) comprises a unique ecological situation to examine biodiversity effects on the distinctive cold-temperate northern Black Sea ecosystem, which has an intriguing biogeographic history and high endemism resulting from geographic isolation and differentiation. Results We summarize negative and positive effects from the War on the aquatic (marine, estuarine, and freshwater) biota and their habitats, focusing on investigations by the Institute of Marine Biology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Negative effects include toxins and habitat damage from oil spills, shelling, mining, explosions, flooding, and fires; along with disregard of Protected Areas. Positive effects are reduced anthropogenic loads from less shipping, fishing, trawling, recreation, hydraulic engineering, construction, and tourism. The Kakhovka Dam’s destruction on June 6, 2023 was the greatest ecological catastrophe to date, causing extensive downstream flooding with freshwaters and pollutants that destroyed many populations and habitats. We discern that many effects have been temporary, with habitats and species replenishing, and some reverting to their historical biota characteristic of lower salinity regimes. However, significant habitat destruction, disturbances, and pollutant damages remain. Since many of the native species evolved in conditions favoring broad salinity, temperature, and oxygen tolerances, the northern Black Sea ecosystem appears pre-adapted for ecological recovery and persistence, which may equate to ecological resilience during and after the War. Conclusions The native biota exhibits long-term adaptiveness to marked salinity and temperature fluctuations, alongside a background of invasive species. An evolutionary and recent history of broad environmental tolerances by a large proportion of Black Sea species may enhance their ability to withstand marked environmental changes, including habitat destruction, as during the Kakhovka Dam’s breakage and other stressors that continue during the Russia–Ukraine War. The Black Sea community’s overall ecological resilience is likely to facilitate persistence and adaptation to the War’s effects and the accelerating impacts of climate change, increased global transportation, and invasive species—meriting worldwide conservation agency focus and cooperation.

Aims and Challenges

We aim to summarize and communicate findings on the ecological effects of the War, focusing on the aquatic biodiversity and habitats in the Black Sea region of Ukraine as little is known and published. Dr. Kvach and Dr. Stepien have been collaborating since 2002 on Black Sea aquatic biodiversity, including native and invasive species, and provide an evolutionary ecological and historical biogeographic perspective about this unique area and its biota and habitats. Field conditions in Ukraine have been hazardous for sampling, and one of our team died during the course of this study (Dr. Pavlo Tkachenko).

Our Approach

We analyze and compile data and results from studies conducted by scientists from the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, in relation to other work. We evaluate both negative and positive effects on the aquatic biota, species diversity, and their habitats from marine, estuarine and freshwaters. Our data include effects of oil spills, flooding, invasive species, pollutants, and habitat changes from the War, with sampling of plant, plankton, benthos, invertebrate, and fish communities before and after the Kakhovka Dam’s destruction on June 6 2023.

Key findings

Our results reveal a fascinating perspective of mixed findings:

  • Negative effects of the War include toxins and habitat damage from oil spills, shelling, mining, explosions, flooding, and fires; along with neglect for Protected Areas and protection of their species.
  • Positive effects are reduced anthropogenic loads from less shipping, fishing, trawling, recreation, hydraulic engineering, construction, and tourism.
  • The Kakhovka Dam’s destruction on June 6, 2023 has comprised the greatest ecological catastrophe to date. This caused extreme downstream flooding with freshwaters and pollutants that destroyed many populations and habitats (as well as houses and towns) resulting in permanent habitat and species assemblage changes to estuarine communities.
  • However, some of the estuarine habitats and species have been replenishing,  reverting to their historical biota characteristic of lower salinity regimes. Thus, the original riverine,  marshland, and fishery nursery habitats and biological communities that existed prior to the Dam's construction in the 1960s have been returning.

The bigger picture

Since many of the native species evolved under conditions of broad salinity, temperature, and oxygen tolerances, the northern Black Sea ecosystem appears pre-adapted for ecological recovery and persistence. This may equate to ecological resilience during and after the War, and may accelerate species and habitat recovery. Our study is important in providing the baseline data for evaluating how this and other biological systems may be able to recover from pronounced disturbance.

Why this matters

Our study provides an important perspective and baseline data for future comparisons, in order to document species and habitat changes.

The path ahead

We hope that protection of species and habitats in the Northern Black Sea resumes in the future. This region is important in harboring many unique species and species assemblages, as well as fisheries communities. We plan to do further work and follow-up studies when it is again safe to sample.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Ecology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Ecology
Freshwater and Marine Ecology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Ecology > Freshwater and Marine Ecology
Environmental Sciences
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences
Marine and Freshwater Sciences
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences > Water > Marine and Freshwater Sciences
Ocean Sciences
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Earth Sciences > Ocean Sciences
International Relations
Humanities and Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies > International Relations
  • Ecological Processes Ecological Processes

    This is is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal devoted to quality publications in ecological studies with a focus on the underlying processes responsible for the dynamics and functions of ecological systems at multiple spatial and temporal scales.