Evaluation of measles elimination strategies in Dongola, Sudan: a surveillance and immunization converge analysis, 2018–2021

This study aimed to evaluate the ongoing activities concerning measles elimination including immunization converges in routine and supplementary vaccination activities, and surveillance system.

Published in Public Health

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Evaluation of measles elimination strategies in Dongola, Sudan: a surveillance and immunization converge analysis, 2018–2021 - Discover Public Health

Background Sudan began measles elimination activities in 2004, as measles remains one of the leading causes of the childhood mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the ongoing activities concerning measles elimination including immunization converges in routine and supplementary vaccination activities, and surveillance system. Materials and methods A retrospective descriptive study was conducted in Dongola locality in Northern state- Sudan from Jan 2018 to Dec 2021. A total of 10 surveillance sites were visited and interviews with 11 focal persons, 29 doctors, EPI head office and operation officers including surveillance officer. Data were collected using WHO- adapted structured questionnaires. Results The study found high measles immunization coverage in 2021 (MCV1: 99.9%, MCV2 80.6%. As for the Surveillance efforts, it found that 100% of suspected measles cases were thoroughly investigated within 48 h, and all reported cases had the required blood samples collected for further analysis. Laboratory confirmed measles cases that were reported between 2018 to 2021 of those who were not vaccinated was 90%, those who were vaccinated with one dose were 5%, and those who were vaccinated with two doses were 5%. Yet 10% focal persons lacked knowledge of measles case definitions. Conclusion Measles elimination efforts in Dongola show strong first-dose coverage (99.9%) and effective surveillance, but challenges remain, including low second-dose uptake (80.6%), laboratory delays, and healthcare provider knowledge gaps. Strengthening MCV2 coverage, improving lab performance, training providers, and boosting community engagement are essential. Future research should explore factors affecting vaccine uptake and the long-term impact of improved immunization strategies.

Behind the Paper: Tackling Measles in Dongola, Sudan — What Surveillance and Immunization Data Revealed
By Alhaj Saad Mohamed Ahmed Ali

Our research began with a fundamental question: Why do measles outbreaks still occur, even in areas where vaccination activities are regularly implemented?
We chose Dongola locality in Northern State, Sudan, as a case study to explore the interaction between immunization efforts and measles surveillance from 2018 to 2021.

Sudan has a long-standing Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI), supplemented by periodic campaigns. Despite these efforts, sporadic measles outbreaks continued to be reported. This prompted us to examine available data more closely to understand where additional opportunities for strengthening measles control might exist.

Why Dongola?

Dongola is relatively well-resourced compared to other localities, with regular immunization activities and a functioning disease surveillance system. However, the recurrence of measles cases suggested there was value in taking a closer look at how routine immunization and surveillance data align—and how they could be used together to inform elimination strategies.

We used a convergence analysis approach, integrating data from both the immunization program and the national disease surveillance system. Our aim was not to critique existing efforts, but to identify areas where coordination and information use could be further enhanced

What Did We Find?

Our analysis yielded several key observations:

  • In some years, measles cases were reported despite high administrative coverage rates, highlighting the importance of continuous follow-up to reach all target populations, particularly children who may not be fully vaccinated

  • We noted the presence of “zero-dose” children—those who had not received their first dose of measles vaccine—indicating potential gaps in access or follow-up.

  • Supplementary Immunization Activities (SIAs) were conducted periodically, and there may be opportunities to further align these with surveillance findings to ensure they reach the most at-risk populations.

  • The sensitivity of the surveillance system appeared to vary slightly over the years, a natural challenge in many contexts, reinforcing the need for ongoing capacity building and support at the facility level.

Why This Matters

Measles remains a key indicator of immunization system performance. While great progress has been made, identifying and reaching unreached children is essential for achieving elimination goals.
This study underscores the value of using available data in a complementary way—not only to monitor progress, but also to inform targeted interventions and planning.

Behind the Numbers

At the heart of this study are the frontline health workers and surveillance officers who continue to carry out essential work under often challenging conditions. Their dedication to recording, reporting, and serving their communities forms the foundation of public health action. This research would not have been possible without their commitment.

Looking Ahead

We hope that this analysis contributes to ongoing efforts to strengthen the use of data in immunization and surveillance systems. By promoting integrated, data-driven decision-making, we believe we can take important steps toward measles elimination in Sudan and similar settings.

Read the full article here: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-025-00558-x

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Public Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Antimicrobial Resistance: The New Challenge to Global Health in a Post-Pandemic World

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a seriously ongoing threat to global health, occurring when bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites evolve to resist the drugs designed to kill or block them. The COVID-19 pandemic has both directly and indirectly exacerbated the problem of AMR, as the overuse of antibiotics has accelerated the development of resistance in many pathogens. COVID-19 may have subsided, but AMR continues to pose a significant risk to the effectiveness of global healthcare systems, threatening to reverse decades of progress in combating infectious diseases. The interplay between population health and AMR has become increasingly critical as healthcare practices have shifted in response to the pandemic. Understanding this relationship is essential for developing effective strategies to mitigate the impact of AMR on population health in a post-COVID context.

The motivation for launching this Collection arises from the urgent need to address the rising tide of AMR as healthcare systems grapple with the long-term effects of the pandemic. Increased antibiotic use during COVID-19 treatment, changes in healthcare access, and disruptions in public health interventions have all contributed to an environment where AMR can thrive. Moreover, the pandemic has highlighted the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to tackling AMR, involving epidemiology, policymaking, and community health initiatives. This Collection aims to provide a platform for researchers and practitioners to share insights and findings that can inform future strategies to combat AMR while considering the broader implications for population health.

This Collection aims to highlight the multifaceted nature of AMR in a post-pandemic environment. We solicit articles that investigate the particular issues provided by the pandemic in terms of AMR development and containment, examine the impact of AMR on many sectors of healthcare, and propose novel strategies to minimize resistance propagation. Submissions may include original research, policy assessments, program evaluations, and comments on the following major areas:

• Epidemiology and trends of AMR post-pandemic

• Impact of COVID-19 on antibiotic usage

• Surveillance strategies for AMR

• AMR and stewardship

• Prevention and control measures to limit AMR spread

• Policies and programs to promote antibiotic stewardship

• Economic and social implications of AMR

• Global collaboration and initiatives to tackle AMR

By addressing these critical issues, this Collection aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the emerging challenges in antimicrobial resistance in a post-pandemic world and to promote effective strategies to preserve the power of our current antimicrobials.

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; COVID-19; antibiotics; global health; infectious diseases; public health; policy; prevention

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jun 30, 2026

From Public Health Policy to Community Practice: Navigating Systemic Challenges in the Health System

Health is shaped by a wide range of interconnected factors, making it a complex and adaptive state that emerges from the interplay of biological, social, emotional, and meaning-making (semiotic) dimensions. As such, improving public health cannot be accomplished through isolated interventions targeting single structural issues or individual diseases. However, medicine and public health research and policies are too often considered through a reductionist, positivist and normative perspective, as epitomised by the influential “disease control” paradigm. This approach limits health to the absence of disease and intends to address the latter by specific “high-impact” or “cost-effective” interventions, neglecting the root causes of ill-health and the complex interplay between individual interventions and (health) systems. This collection invites contributions that demonstrate how systems and complexity thinking can inform and transform public health policy and practice.

The interplay between public health policy and community practice is essential in shaping health outcomes and addressing systemic challenges within health systems. Despite the formulation of comprehensive public health policies, translating these policies into effective community-level interventions often faces numerous obstacles, including resource limitations, bureaucratic inertia, and varying local contexts. Understanding the dynamics between policy intent and on-the-ground implementation is crucial for fostering health equity and improving population health. The ability to navigate these complexities is vital for public health professionals, policymakers, and community practitioners alike. We are particularly interested in articles that showcase practical applications of systems approaches to address real-world public health challenges. We especially encourage submissions from authors in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), highlighting efforts to strengthen healthcare systems in their specific contexts.

The purpose of this Collection is to explore the systemic challenges in public health and the strategies employed to overcome them in community settings. We invite contributions that examine case studies, innovative frameworks, and collaborative approaches that enhance policy implementation and address local health needs.

Keywords: public health, health policy, community health, health economics, social determinants of health, political determinants of health, commercial determinants of health, health system, systems thinking, complexity science

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: May 31, 2026