From Bedside to Bench and Back Again

From Bedside to Bench and Back Again
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Read the paper

medRxiv
medRxiv medRxiv

Double-Blind Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of a Lactobacillus Probiotic Blend in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Rationale The gut-lung axis describes the crosstalk between the gut and lung wherein microbiota in the gut modulate systemic anti-inflammatory and immune responses in the lungs. Objectives: We hypothesized that a blend of probiotic bacteria ( Lactobacilli ) combined with herbal extracts (resB®) could improve quality of life in COPD patients. Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study ([NCT05523180][1]) evaluating the safety and impact of resB® on quality of life in volunteers with COPD. Participants took two capsules of resB® or placebo orally daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was quality of life changes by Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). In addition to safety, exploratory endpoints included changes in serum and sputum biomarkers as well as sputum and stool microbiome. Measurements and Main Results resB® was well tolerated by all participants, with no related adverse events reported. Participants who received resB® had improvement in their SGRQ symptom scores from baseline to final visit (P<0.05), while the change in SGRQ symptom scores in those receiving placebo was not significant. Serum and sputum concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase 9, serum c-reactive protein, and serum interleukin 6 decreased (P<0.05) between baseline and final visit in the resB® group, corresponding with an increase in stool Lactobacilli abundance. Relative abundance of Veillonella also increased in stool and sputum in the resB® group. Conclusions Participants with COPD who received resB® improved in respiratory symptoms over a 12-week course. Serum and sputum biomarkers suggest administration of the probiotic and herbal blend reduces inflammation and may thereby attenuate symptoms. ### Competing Interest Statement ResBiotic Nutrition Inc. is a university startup out of the University of Alabama at Birmingham of which CL is the Founder, AG is the Chief Medical Officer, and NA is an Advisor. The authors declare that the research was conducted by a third-party contract research organization, in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. ### Clinical Trial NCT05523180 ### Funding Statement Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under awards number K08 HL141652 (CL) and R44HL164156 (TN) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number UM1TR004771. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Sterling Institutional Review Board (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) gave ethical approval for this work. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT05523180&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F10%2F04%2F2024.10.02.24314795.atom

In my early days at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, the concept of a lung microbiome was still in its infancy. The Human Microbiome Project hadn’t included the lungs as a target tissue for study, setting back our understanding of its microbial dynamics a good 10 years behind that of the gut and the skin. 

The birthplace of our research was, fittingly, the Neonatology Department at UAB. As a neonatologist, my research focused on understanding the mechanisms underlying airway diseases of premature infancy like Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD). At the time, we had recently shown that infants had a lung microbiome at birth, challenging the previously held thinking that the airways were sterile. We analyzed premature infants’ tracheal aspirate samples across multiple cohorts, using the microbial signatures to predict whether or not the patient would develop BPD. Accordingly, we found that an enrichment of proteobacteria and depletion of firmicutes was congruent with a BPD phenotype, while the opposite was true in resisting its development. 

Around the same time, I started collaborating with Dr. Amit Gaggar in the Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, an expert in protease biology. His research had defined a role for matrikines, bioactive fragments of the extracellular matrix (ECM), in driving airway tissue degradation in pulmonary disease. Acetylated PGP (Ac-PGP) in particular is generated when an enzyme called matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) degrades collagen in the ECM, liberating Ac-PGP to trigger a swath of pro-neutrophilic inflammatory cytokines downstream in an attempt to signal for tissue repair.

In order to connect the dots between the proteobacteria phenomenon we had observed in patients and the Ac-PGP/MMP-9 mechanism we had observed in Dr. Gaggar’s lab, we generated multiple murine models. We found that dual exposure to hyperoxia and E. coli-derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in mouse pups increased tissue damage, decreased lung function, and increased biomarkers of neutrophilic inflammation. Overexpression of Ac-PGP function exacerbated the damage while inhibition attenuated it.

We had worked from the bedside to the bench to understand the mechanisms at work; the next step was to go back from the bench to the bedside to consider a therapeutic intervention. Our hypothesis was rooted in our earlier findings: what if we could supplement firmicutes to counteract the neutrophilic inflammation and subsequent airway damage?

We returned to our murine models of BPD and did exactly that, dosing mouse pups with a blend of live Lactobacilli strains intranasally. We observed significant improvements across tissue structure and biomarkers in the lungs. This got us more curious about 1. the underlying mechanisms to the commensal bacteria’s anti-neutrophilic activity and 2. our approach’s applicability in adult airway disease.

Figure 1. Inhalation of a live Lactobacilli strains has a number of downstream effects largely related to the reduction of neutrophilic inflammation in airway tissue.

Through a series of in vitro and in vivo tests, we identified L(+) lactic acid as a marker of activity for the Lactobacilli that was at least in part responsible for the reductions in neutrophilic inflammatory pathway activity we had observed. When mice were administered the Lactobacilli blend to the lungs, the strains were cleared by the lungs over time, but the metabolic signature of L(+) lactic acid remained active for longer. 

We turned our attention to making this potent blend of commensal bacteria more readily inhalable. In partnership with many of the scientists involved in developing the first inhaled insulin formulation, we used particle engineering to spray dry the bacteria into a flowable powder while, importantly, maintaining the viability of strains. Thus, an inhaled live biotherapeutic (LBP) was born.

Figure 2. Top: flow chart of spray drying process used to particle engineer live Lactobacilli. Bottom: Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of powder formulations.

Armed with an active drug product powder, we tested the Lactobacilli blend extensively in adult mouse models of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). We challenged mice with porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE) and E. coli-derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS), our own twist on modeling severe, exacerbated COPD. In pre- and therapeutic treatment schemes, we observed major improvements in lung tissue structure as well as biomarker improvements in the serum, lung tissue, and bronchoalveolar lavage. 

To pressure test the safety of the Lactobacilli LBP, we conducted respiratory safety and biodistribution studies in PPE-exposed mice to model inhalation in a disease state. In addition to 100% survival of the mice tested, all vital signs remained within normal ranges. Of note, the Lactobacilli strains did not distribute beyond the lungs into the serum, brain, heart, liver, or kidneys, nor did it engraft in the lungs. These were positive indications that inhalation of the live bacteria could be suitably safe for delivery. 

On a journey of over 10 years of exploration, the heart of it all has remained patients’ lives. By pioneering inhaled LBPs as a new class of drugs, we push towards a future where patients have a wealth of treatment options at their fingertips. A future where steroids aren’t the only option and side effects with recurrent use are minimized. The human microbiome is a vast resource that we’ve only just begun to explore – who knows where it will take us next?

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in