Harm Reduction Journal is currently accepting submissions for our collection on Community-Engaged Harm-Reduction Research for Social Justice. The persistent, significant gap between research and practice has prompted calls from advocates, policy makers, patients, and research agencies for greater involvement of individuals with lived experience in the conceptualization and realization of public health research. Today, researchers are increasingly including patient and community consultants as well as advisory boards in their research designs. Engaging partners with lived experience (e.g., previous drug use) or living experience (e.g., current drug use) is crucial for addressing our most urgent, global public health needs. However, these approaches are particularly useful for promoting health equity and justice by incorporating the voices and perspectives of those traditionally disenfranchised from access to health. Thus, advancing our understanding of community-engaged harm-reduction research for social justice can help mitigate issues of stigmatization, marginalization, and criminalization in public health and human rights.

The purpose of this special collection is to disseminate research, commentary, and novel methodologies that describe community-engaged harm reduction approaches to promote social justice across the globe. We acknowledge the various forms of community engagement, and therefore, welcome submissions from those who involve affected community members in diverse ways, ranging from advisors to equitable research partners engaged in systematic approaches such as participatory action research and community-based participatory research. We also encourage submissions on community-driven or community-led projects that may receive support or guidance from researchers. The vision of social justice in this context refers to a state where all people, regardless of demographic characteristics, have the resources, respect, and supports they need to flourish.

Possible topics include, but are not limited to:

• Impact of harm reduction interventions on health equity outcomes

• Novel community engaged research strategies with marginalized communities

• Experiences of community members engaging in harm reduction research

• Applications of research and research findings to social justice advocacy

• Equitable allocation of harm reduction tools and services

• Ethical conduct and respect for marginalized communities.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health and Well-Being, SDG 10, Reduced Inequalities, SDG 16, Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, and SDG 17, Partnerships for the Goals.

All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

BMC Global and Public Health is calling for submissions to our Collection on implementation science in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Implementation science, crucial for achieving health-related United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, focuses on bridging the gap between evidence-based practices and their real-world application by practitioners and policymakers. This interdisciplinary approach aims to maximize the impact of evidence-informed interventions, acknowledging the contextual differences between high-income countries (HIC) and low- and middle-income countries. While theories and frameworks from HIC may not directly apply to LMIC contexts, there is a need to amplify insights from LMIC implementation science studies to ensure progress towards global health goals.

Health interventions would never reach their expected impact unless wisely implemented. Implementation science refers to the study of methods that facilitate the uptake of evidence-based practice into regular use by practitioners and policymakers and is increasingly recognized as important for achieving health-related United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It seeks to close the gap between what is known and what to do, thus improving health services and outcomes through an interdisciplinary approach. Successful implementation strategies could maximize the beneficial impact of evidence-informed interventions (including programs, policies, and practices) at scale in real-world contexts. Given the extent to which context shapes implementation, implementation science may be highly contextualized, and concepts, principles, and methods from one setting may not be readily transportable to another. This should be considered when comparing implementation science studies from high-income countries (HIC) and low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This is why certain implementation science theories, models, and frameworks developed in HIC are only readily applicable in LMIC with further adaptations. However, inherent publication biases that advantage academic cultures, philosophies, and systems from HIC have limited the visibility of implementation science studies from LMIC and insights into how the field has differentially evolved in LMIC, where more progress for achieving the UN SDGs is still needed.

The limited insights from LMIC may have further impacted our understanding of how implementation science can be applied to achieve health equity – since addressing health inequities is a major priority in resource-limited settings, where most of the LMIC population resides.

To capture global efforts and novel approaches in this multidisciplinary area, BMC Global and Public Health is pleased to announce a call for papers for our upcoming Collection entitled ‘Evolving implementation science concepts and methods in low- and middle-income countries’, guest edited by Dr Olakunle Alonge, from the Sparkman Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA and Dr Meredith B. Brooks, PhD, MPH, from the Boston University School of Public Health, USA.

We are now inviting the submission of Research, Comment, Review, and Opinion articles of outstanding interest covering the breadth of multidisciplinary studies, including quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, and multi-methods studies that apply concepts and methods from implementation science to improve health services and outcomes, especially health equity, in LMICs. We envision this work advancing the growth of the field of implementation science globally.

We encourage submissions that address the following themes:

New concepts, theories, or frameworks for implementation science in LMIC contexts

New methodology that advances implementation evaluation and mechanisms investigation

Implementation trials and hybrid implementation-effectiveness trials for public health intervention

Pilot/feasibility studies of full-scale implementation projects

Studies of adaptation and implementation of evidence-based public health interventions in LMIC

Explorations of sociocultural factors for successful implementation of public health projects

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities.

We encourage work from local, regional, and global partnerships and collaboration among scientists from multidisciplinary fields using multiple methodologies. Please note that we are not able to consider studies that are too clinically focused. We further ask that authors be attentive to the use of non-stigmatizing/preferred language in their manuscripts as outlined in relevant language guidelines for their respective fields.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.