Mobile apps found to promote more sustainable and healthier diets

The first systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effectiveness of apps to promote dietary change for planetary and human health. Across 21 studies and 10 countries and territories, we found benefits on promoting fruit and vegetables and reducing meat.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

The effectiveness of mobile app-based interventions in facilitating behaviour change towards healthier and more sustainable diets: a systematic review and meta-analysis - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Digital health apps have been shown to influence healthy eating, but whether they can promote environmentally friendly diets remains unclear. In countries where diets typically contain a high proportion of carbon-intensive foods (e.g., meat), transitioning to healthier alternatives (e.g., fruit, vegetables, and legumes) can substantially reduce food-related greenhouse gas emissions while also improving public health. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of mobile apps in facilitating more sustainable and healthier diets among adults from high-income countries. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Health, GreenFILE, Web of Science, Cochrane Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until Jan 20, 2025. We included studies that reported the effects of app-based behavioural interventions on the consumption of fruit, vegetables, legumes, nuts, fish, dairy, and/or meat, compared to a control, baseline period, or different intervention. For outcomes measured in at least two studies, we conducted random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression to understand population differences and the role of specific intervention components. Of the 7356 records screened, 21 were included. Nine studies scored ‘high’, 10 scored ‘fair’, and two scored ‘low’ for reporting transparency. Combined, the studies analysed 12,898 participants, interventions lasted from three days to six months, and outcomes were assessed up to 12 months post-intervention. Forty percent of studies targeted populations with at least one health risk factor and 81% of study populations did not meet dietary guidelines at baseline for their primary outcome. Meta-analyses indicated that app use led to increased fruit and vegetable consumption (0.48 portions/day, 95% CI 0.18, 0.78, p = 0.002) and a small decrease in meat consumption (-0.10 portions/day, 95% CI -0.16, -0.03, p = 0.004), with meat-focussed apps showing as more effective than general apps for meat reduction. Meta-regression also revealed that message-based content was particularly effective in promoting meat reduction. There were no pronounced effects on legume or dairy consumption, or differences across populations. Our results indicate that apps could be a valuable addition to the multiple interventions required to promote sustainable diets. However, to strengthen the evidence for outcomes beyond fruit and vegetables, we need standardised reporting of populations and intervention components.

We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating healthy eating apps and their impact on health and sustainability, published in the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

This is a crucial study considering evidence showing that the global food system contributes approximately one third of greenhouse gas emissions, and at the same time, poor diets are a leading cause of obesity. The diet and nutrition app industry is huge – about 1 in 5 people in the UK use one of the 350,000 health-related apps out there. This provides an unprecedented platform for dietary interventions, and our work is an important piece of the puzzle in understanding their potential.

From an initial pool of 7,356 studies, 21 met the criteria for inclusion in the final review. Together, these involved 12,898 participants across 10 countries and territories, including the USA, UK, Spain, Italy, China, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, and Puerto Rico.

 

Key points:

  1. Apps can promote sustainable and healthy dietary behaviour, through boosts in fruit and vegetable consumption (around three portions per week on average) and reductions in meat (to a smaller degree).
  2. Meat-centric content, notifications, and message boards were most effective for meat reduction, providing a new perspective to previous research suggesting meat intake is particularly hard to change through informational/educational tools only.
  3. Largely accessed by those not meeting dietary guidelines, they may be able to reach those most in need rather than widening health inequalities.
  4. Evidence gaps include: effects on foods such as dairy and fish, assessment of dietary emissions alongside food consumption, long-term and repeated follow-up measurements, evaluations of commercial apps, and reporting markers of inequality.

 

A story behind our study:

Samina was among public contributors who helped shape the research, advising how to consider the views and experiences of people from ethnic minority communities - including those from South Asian backgrounds - into the study design.

The mum-of-one from Bradford, West Yorkshire, has shed 8kgs (nearly 1.5 stone) so far this year through using the NHS Weight Loss Plan App, and she is determined to keep on going. Now she limits eating meat to once a week and makes healthier choices to shop for seasonal fruit and vegetables to reduce her carbon footprint.

She said “I use the app to put in what I’ve had for lunch and other meals, and it’ll calculate the precise calories. What motivates me is I can see the progress I’m making on the screen in front of me, and the app sends you motivational messages.”

 

What’s next?

As a next step, the researchers are collaborating with an existing app to design and pilot a message-based intervention to understand the effects in a group of local authority employees in England.

More broadly, we hope this study will pave the way for more evaluations and systematic reviews of digital interventions to consider behaviour change techniques alongside modes of delivery. This will better highlight which elements of apps work and how they are implemented. Our insights could also be used by app developers when designing and further improving diet-related behaviour change apps, including – for example – those used by national governments and health practitioners. Consumers could also be aware of the characteristics of apps to look for when choosing an app to use themselves. Together, it is hoped this research will contribute to an improved understanding of the role of smartphone apps within the multiple interventions needed to accelerate dietary shifts towards more sustainable and healthier diets.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Nutrition
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Health Care > Nutrition
Consumer Behavior
Humanities and Social Sciences > Behavioral Sciences and Psychology > Social Psychology > Consumer Behavior
Climate Change Mitigation
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Environmental Social Sciences > Climate Change Mitigation
Digital Education and Educational Technology
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Media Education > Digital Education and Educational Technology
Sustainability
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Ecology > Ecological Modelling > Sustainability
Health Psychology
Humanities and Social Sciences > Behavioral Sciences and Psychology > Health Psychology