Obesity-related colorectal cancer risk differs for men and women

Published in Cancer
Obesity-related colorectal cancer risk differs for men and women
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Obesity is viewed as a likely cause of colorectal cancer (CRC, also known as bowel cancer) [1], but still unclear is whether risk differs for men and women, and exactly how obesity biologically causes CRC. Using a sort of naturally occurring trial called Mendelian randomization [2], which uses genetic information to better understand causality of modifiable factors, we examined whether two different measures of obesity – namely body mass index (BMI) and waist-hip-ratio (WHR) were associated with CRC risk among men and women separately. We also investigated whether circulating metabolites, or small molecules in blood which capture metabolic processes, could explain these relationships [3]. These Mendelian randomization methods, when key assumptions are met, help to minimise issues of confounding and reverse causation which are common pitfalls of observational studies [2].

Obesity is viewed as an important risk factor for cancer by the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) https://www.wcrf-uk.org/uk/our-research/research-we-fund

 As part of a collaboration between the International Agency for Research and Cancer (IARC) in France, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centre in the US, and the University of Bristol in the UK, we acquired summary statistics from three major consortia, including the Genetics of Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO), together describing the genotypes of over 100,000 individuals from 72 studies to better estimate the role of adiposity in CRC, separately by sex and anatomical sub-site (colon, proximal colon, distal colon and rectum). We used publicly available summary statistics describing the genetics of adiposity (BMI, WHR) and metabolites detected by targeted NMR spectroscopy. These metabolites included detailed lipid traits plus amino acids, fatty acids and inflammatory glycoproteins.

Metabolites detectable in blood using the Nightingale Health NMR panel https://nightingalehealth.com/research/blood-biomarker-analysis

Our results suggest that BMI and WHR associations do not differ substantially by CRC site, but do differ substantially by sex. Higher BMI is more strongly associated with CRC risk in men, whereas higher WHR is more strongly associated with CRC in women. This was surprising as BMI and WHR are highly correlated, and we hypothesise that this could be because women are more likely to store fat peripherally, meaning that WHR is better able to capture the extremes of adiposity in women.

A two-minute primer on Mendelian randomization

We explored potential mechanisms through which adiposity could influence CRC by examining metabolites as intermediate biomarkers. Despite examining over 100 metabolites from multiple biological subclasses, we did not identify any convincing metabolite-CRC associations which could explain the adipose-CRC relationship. Future studies using new and improved methodological techniques and exploring even more detailed metabolites, proteins, hormones, and inflammatory factors as potential mediators are needed to uncover the biological pathways between adiposity and CRC. This should be done among men and women separately given their markedly different risks from obesity. Understanding these pathways is more important than ever because of how common overweight and obesity are, and how difficult they are to reverse.

Read the paper here: https://rdcu.be/cclz2

References

  1. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Expert Report. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and colorectal cancer. 2018.
  2. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol. 2003; 32(1): 1–22.
  3. Bull CJ, Bell JA, Murphy N, et al. Adiposity, metabolites, and colorectal cancer risk: Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med. 2020; 18(1): 396.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Cancer Biology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Cancer Biology
  • BMC Medicine BMC Medicine

    This journal publishes outstanding and influential research in all areas of clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities.

Related Collections

With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Cancer prevention

Cancer remains a formidable challenge, being the second most common cause of death globally. Over the years, significant progress has been made in understanding risk factors as well as developing preventive and therapeutic strategies. However, many essential gaps remain to be addressed. This collection seeks to highlight developments in understanding the molecular, genetic, environmental, and lifestyle determinants that contribute to cancer development, and potential strategies to prevent their occurrence.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Oct 11, 2024

Food environments and health

"BMC Medicine is calling for submissions to our Collection on food environments and their impact on public health. Nearly 70% of all deaths worldwide are attributed to non-communicable diseases, which are closely linked to diet and lifestyle. It is estimated that more than 41 million children under the age of five and 1.9 billion adults suffer from obesity, which is now increasingly a problem in low- and middle-income countries. Additionally, in 2022, globally, 148.1 million children under the age of 5 years of age were classified as stunted, and 45 million as wasted. Given these statistics, it is crucial to deepen our understanding of the food environments that people must navigate daily. This Collection seeks to highlight the physical, economic, social, and cultural contexts in which individuals make choices about what to eat, including the availability of healthy and unhealthy foods, the influence of marketing and advertising, as well as the impact of policies and regulations related to food production and distribution. By deepening our understanding of food environments’ impacts on dietary choices and health outcomes, we seek to support SDG 2's mission of achieving food security, improving nutrition, and promoting sustainable agriculture. We invite contributions that explore topics including, but not limited to, the following: Nutritional epidemiology and food consumption patterns: Evaluate the influence of cultural, socioeconomic, and geographic factors on dietary habits and their impact on health and inequalities. Food accessibility and security: Explore the impact of food deserts and food swamps on communities, as well as the role of policy, supply chains, migration, rural land use changes, and urban planning in shaping food environments. Document who is at risk of food insecurity, where, and with what social and biological consequences. Food marketing and its effects: Analyze the impact of food advertising, especially on children and vulnerable populations, and identify potential regulatory and behavioral interventions to mitigate the adverse effects of marketing. Food sustainability and health: Examine the environmental and health implications of food consumption, production, and distribution and assess the feasibility and impact of sustainable diets. Additionally, explore the impact of climate change on food environments, including food security, availability, affordability, and quality. Interventions and policy initiatives: Evaluate the effectiveness of various strategies, such as behavioral interventions, social policies, trade and agricultural policies, taxation, and labeling, in improving food environments and reducing food insecurity. Food technology and innovation: Explore the impact of food processing, fortification, and new technologies on nutrition and health. Behavioral science approaches for better diets: Examine decision-making, food preferences, and interventions designed to promote healthier choices based on environmental cues and individual perceptions. Systems science approaches to better nutrition: Analyze the interconnected components of food systems, helping identify how changes in one part affect the whole, offering insights for systemic interventions that can improve nutrition. The role of the built environment on nutrition and health: Explore the built environment's impact on nutrition and health, including food accessibility and physical surroundings."

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Ongoing