Paradigm shift from shareholders and stakeholders to future successors

Shareholder and stakeholder paradigms, corporate social responsibility and sustainability address business relationships with society and the natural environment. However, Lara Johannsdottir and Brynhildur Davidsdottir suggest shifting the focus to future successors in a recently published article.

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Proposed paradigm shift from shareholders and stakeholders to future successors - Discover Sustainability

When the stakeholder theory challenged the neoclassical shareholder theory, it was a step forward in the theoretical and practical debate about the role and responsibility of businesses in society and how wide the responsibility is. Today, neither of these theories go far enough to explain the responsibilities of businesses in society and neither do corporate social responsibility nor corporate sustainability given the complexity of the business environment in which companies operate and how far they are going, or how far they are pushed, to respond to grand challenges or the opportunities they may entail. The aim of this paper is to provide a theoretical exploration and a critical appraisal of the need for a paradigm shift from shareholders and stakeholders to future successors. This is grounded in a discussion about corporate social responsibility/corporate sustainability, and the relevance of environmental constraints, multilateral sustainability policies and pathways, and needs and requirements of corporate future successors that are important for businesses that want to prosper in the long-term. The findings suggest that forward-looking supranational political and economic unions, intergovernmental organizations, regional and local governments, and leading businesses have moved ahead of theory towards including intra- and intergenerational interests and the natural environment into their policies, regulations, and strategies. In doing so, they even go so far as to grant personhood to the natural environment, thereby recognizing the importance of the natural environment for their own and the prosperity of present and future generations who will be future successors of businesses. Consequently, the implication of the paper is to suggest a new theoretical lens which has a much wider scope than shareholder and stakeholder theories currently do, and a strategic roadmap, emphasizing the importance of future successors for corporate responsibility and successful business operations in the long-term and pinpoint ways forward in doing so.

Theories including the ones falling under the shareholder and the stakeholder paradigms, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate sustainability (CS) are used to explain business relationships with the internal and external environment in which they operate. However, their environment is becoming more and more complicated given the environmental and social issues they are expected to address by stakeholders, as many of these issues are caused by businesses that have externalized the true cost of doing business, such as through emissions of greenhouse gases, pollution caused by business operations, poverty and unsafe working conditions of workers within their value chains and so one. The paper (Johannsdottir & Davidsdottir, 2024) therefore explores the limitations of these theories in addressing the complex responsibilities of businesses today and proposes a paradigm shift from these theories towards a focus on future successors defined in the paper “as those that will take over the running of businesses from the current managers, whether they are children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren of all genders, or others who belong to future generations not currently running businesses” (p.2).

The paper argues that none of the theories discussed above sufficiently account for the negative long-term impacts of business activities on society and the environment. Therefore, the authors propose a new theoretical framework and a roadmap to emphasize and incorporate the future successor’s interests into the daily operations of businesses. The future successors as the definition indicates are the generations, both the ones living today and those not yet born, that will inherit the outcomes of businesses’ strategic directions and decisions made by current business leaders. This approach integrates the environmental constraints made by the boundaries of the planet and the sustainable development that must happen. The paper explains that by focusing on short-term financial interest and financial wealth maximization for shareholders alone will make future successors vulnerable, while long-term sustainability interests and value maximization focusing on future successors will help them thrive, see Fig. 1.

Fig. 1 Typology of firms’ maximization interests and future successors’ outcomes

The paper includes a theoretical model explaining how businesses should operate in such a way that they account for planetary health and boundaries where sustainable development serves as a multilateral policy and a roadmap guiding business operations. Within those boundaries and a roadmap, there must be an enlargement of interests from current and narrowly defined interests of stakeholders to future successors of intra- and intergenerations. The model combines boundaries, stakeholders and actors (businesses) and their interests, as well as including the dimension of future successors. The paper furthermore provides examples of how some forward-thinking governments and businesses are currently moving in this direction by incorporating the interests of future generations and the natural environment into their policies and actions.

The paper also provides a strategic roadmap of 12Ps for future successors to thrive and prosper within planetary boundaries (Johannsdottir & Davidsdottir, 2024). The 12Ps are shown in Fig. 2, where one first looks at the boundary perspective, then the business aspects, followed by the traits of bold and advanced leaders, before considering the basic outcome.

Fig. 2. A strategic roadmap of 12Ps for future successors to thrive and prosper within planetary boundaries

Conclusion

By proposing a paradigm shift from shareholders and stakeholders to future successors the paper explores a new way of thinking about the responsibilities of business, and the role and responsibilities of business leaders, in today’s business environment. This is done by arguing that the shareholder, stakeholder, CSR and CS theoretical approaches do not sufficiently address today’s complicated business environment and global challenges that must be solved, instead offering alternative solutions by presenting new theoretical models and a roadmap demonstrating how to move forward so business operation do not harm the interests of future generations, in this case framed as future successors. In essences, the key message of the paper is about changing the focus and the scope of corporate responsibility/corporate sustainability so that the interests of future successors are incorporated, thus ensuring that businesses contribute in a positive way to sustainable development and a prosperous future for all.

References

Johannsdottir, L., & Davidsdottir, B. (2024). Proposed paradigm shift from shareholders and stakeholders to future successors. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00402-3 

Follow the Topic

Sustainability
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability
International Business
Humanities and Social Sciences > Business and Management > International Business
Business Ethics
Humanities and Social Sciences > Business and Management > Management > Business Ethics
Business Strategy and Leadership
Humanities and Social Sciences > Business and Management > Management > Business Strategy and Leadership
Diversity Management and Women in Business
Humanities and Social Sciences > Business and Management > Human Resource Management > Diversity Management and Women in Business

What are SDG Topics?

An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.

Continue reading announcement

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Climate Resilient, Smart and Sustainable Futures: Integrated Solutions for a Just and Inclusive Planet

Given the growing concern over the impact of climate change-induced extreme weather events, transformative responses to the climate crisis are required to integrate resilience building, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), digital and smart technologies, equitable governance, and sectoral pathways (including heritage conservation, tourism, and aviation). This collection invites transdisciplinary research that advances knowledge on integrated solutions for climate-resilient, smart, and sustainable futures, especially in the contexts of the developing world. This collection is seeking research that bridges theoretical advances, empirical studies, and policy/practice implications with a strong preference for studies that speak to real-world transitions, justice, inclusivity, and cross-sectoral collaboration. Topics of interest for this collection include:

• Climate Impact, Resilience and Mitigation

• Sustainable Development Goals Integration

• Smart change and digital transformations

• Policy, law, and governance

• Heritage, tourism, aviation, and services under climate change

Keywords: Climate Change, SDGs, Smart Change, Climate Resilience, Policy and Governance, Tourism, Nature-Based Solutions

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 30, 2027

Environmental Management and the SDGs: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions

Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires innovative and effective approaches to environmental management. This Collection welcomes research that addresses practical solutions, emerging challenges, and new directions in managing environmental resources in support of SDGs such as clean water (SDG 6), clean energy (SDG 7), sustainable cities (SDG 11), responsible production (SDG 12), climate action (SDG 13), and protection of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (SDG 14 & 15). We invite articles presenting scientific advancements, applied case studies, policy insights, and assessment tools that help governments, communities, and industries strengthen sustainability and environmental resilience in both developing and developed regions.

Keywords: Sustainable development, Environmental management, Climate resilience, Environmental assessment (EIA/SEA/SIA), Renewable energy, Circular economy, Biodiversity, Municipal solid waste management, Environmental policy and governance

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 01, 2026