Paradigm shift from shareholders and stakeholders to future successors

Shareholder and stakeholder paradigms, corporate social responsibility and sustainability address business relationships with society and the natural environment. However, Lara Johannsdottir and Brynhildur Davidsdottir suggest shifting the focus to future successors in a recently published article.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Proposed paradigm shift from shareholders and stakeholders to future successors - Discover Sustainability

When the stakeholder theory challenged the neoclassical shareholder theory, it was a step forward in the theoretical and practical debate about the role and responsibility of businesses in society and how wide the responsibility is. Today, neither of these theories go far enough to explain the responsibilities of businesses in society and neither do corporate social responsibility nor corporate sustainability given the complexity of the business environment in which companies operate and how far they are going, or how far they are pushed, to respond to grand challenges or the opportunities they may entail. The aim of this paper is to provide a theoretical exploration and a critical appraisal of the need for a paradigm shift from shareholders and stakeholders to future successors. This is grounded in a discussion about corporate social responsibility/corporate sustainability, and the relevance of environmental constraints, multilateral sustainability policies and pathways, and needs and requirements of corporate future successors that are important for businesses that want to prosper in the long-term. The findings suggest that forward-looking supranational political and economic unions, intergovernmental organizations, regional and local governments, and leading businesses have moved ahead of theory towards including intra- and intergenerational interests and the natural environment into their policies, regulations, and strategies. In doing so, they even go so far as to grant personhood to the natural environment, thereby recognizing the importance of the natural environment for their own and the prosperity of present and future generations who will be future successors of businesses. Consequently, the implication of the paper is to suggest a new theoretical lens which has a much wider scope than shareholder and stakeholder theories currently do, and a strategic roadmap, emphasizing the importance of future successors for corporate responsibility and successful business operations in the long-term and pinpoint ways forward in doing so.

Theories including the ones falling under the shareholder and the stakeholder paradigms, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate sustainability (CS) are used to explain business relationships with the internal and external environment in which they operate. However, their environment is becoming more and more complicated given the environmental and social issues they are expected to address by stakeholders, as many of these issues are caused by businesses that have externalized the true cost of doing business, such as through emissions of greenhouse gases, pollution caused by business operations, poverty and unsafe working conditions of workers within their value chains and so one. The paper (Johannsdottir & Davidsdottir, 2024) therefore explores the limitations of these theories in addressing the complex responsibilities of businesses today and proposes a paradigm shift from these theories towards a focus on future successors defined in the paper “as those that will take over the running of businesses from the current managers, whether they are children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren of all genders, or others who belong to future generations not currently running businesses” (p.2).

The paper argues that none of the theories discussed above sufficiently account for the negative long-term impacts of business activities on society and the environment. Therefore, the authors propose a new theoretical framework and a roadmap to emphasize and incorporate the future successor’s interests into the daily operations of businesses. The future successors as the definition indicates are the generations, both the ones living today and those not yet born, that will inherit the outcomes of businesses’ strategic directions and decisions made by current business leaders. This approach integrates the environmental constraints made by the boundaries of the planet and the sustainable development that must happen. The paper explains that by focusing on short-term financial interest and financial wealth maximization for shareholders alone will make future successors vulnerable, while long-term sustainability interests and value maximization focusing on future successors will help them thrive, see Fig. 1.

Fig. 1 Typology of firms’ maximization interests and future successors’ outcomes

The paper includes a theoretical model explaining how businesses should operate in such a way that they account for planetary health and boundaries where sustainable development serves as a multilateral policy and a roadmap guiding business operations. Within those boundaries and a roadmap, there must be an enlargement of interests from current and narrowly defined interests of stakeholders to future successors of intra- and intergenerations. The model combines boundaries, stakeholders and actors (businesses) and their interests, as well as including the dimension of future successors. The paper furthermore provides examples of how some forward-thinking governments and businesses are currently moving in this direction by incorporating the interests of future generations and the natural environment into their policies and actions.

The paper also provides a strategic roadmap of 12Ps for future successors to thrive and prosper within planetary boundaries (Johannsdottir & Davidsdottir, 2024). The 12Ps are shown in Fig. 2, where one first looks at the boundary perspective, then the business aspects, followed by the traits of bold and advanced leaders, before considering the basic outcome.

Fig. 2. A strategic roadmap of 12Ps for future successors to thrive and prosper within planetary boundaries

Conclusion

By proposing a paradigm shift from shareholders and stakeholders to future successors the paper explores a new way of thinking about the responsibilities of business, and the role and responsibilities of business leaders, in today’s business environment. This is done by arguing that the shareholder, stakeholder, CSR and CS theoretical approaches do not sufficiently address today’s complicated business environment and global challenges that must be solved, instead offering alternative solutions by presenting new theoretical models and a roadmap demonstrating how to move forward so business operation do not harm the interests of future generations, in this case framed as future successors. In essences, the key message of the paper is about changing the focus and the scope of corporate responsibility/corporate sustainability so that the interests of future successors are incorporated, thus ensuring that businesses contribute in a positive way to sustainable development and a prosperous future for all.

References

Johannsdottir, L., & Davidsdottir, B. (2024). Proposed paradigm shift from shareholders and stakeholders to future successors. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00402-3 

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Sustainability
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability
International Business
Humanities and Social Sciences > Business and Management > International Business
Business Ethics
Humanities and Social Sciences > Business and Management > Management > Business Ethics
Business Strategy and Leadership
Humanities and Social Sciences > Business and Management > Management > Business Strategy and Leadership
Diversity Management and Women in Business
Humanities and Social Sciences > Business and Management > Human Resource Management > Diversity Management and Women in Business

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation in Advancing Sustainable Development Goals

This Collection is expected to explore the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and digital innovation in improving progress toward the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We aim to highlight interdisciplinary research, technological breakthroughs, and practical applications that leverage AI-driven tools, data science, and digital systems to tackle global challenges such as poverty, climate change, healthcare, education, and sustainable infrastructure. This Collection provides a platform for advancing responsible and inclusive innovation by closely bridging technology and sustainability.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 9, SDG 11, SDG 12, SDG 13 & SDG 16

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Digital Innovation, Sustainable Development Goals, Smart Technologies, Data Science, Climate Action, Ethical AI, Smart Cities, Digital Transformation.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 01, 2026

Environmental Sustainability Needs Humanities

As demonstrated in the Sustainable Development Goals, the three main pillars of sustainability are environment, economy, and society. For achieving social and economic sustainability, environmental sustainability is a prerequisite. However, the Earth system is on the edge of crossing the thresholds that will trigger non-linear, abrupt environmental change and result in deleterious or even catastrophic consequences. Recent evidence indicates that humanity has transgressed six planetary boundaries, including climate change and biosphere integrity. While the total anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions continue to reach a new peak in 2023, biodiversity loss is happening at an unprecedented rate, with an average 69% decline in wildlife populations since 1970. As climate change and biodiversity loss are mainly anthropogenic-induced, these environmental issues have to be and can only be solved by humans. Sole technological transformation and innovation are largely insufficient for solving the environmental problems, but social transitions are also required. Humans’ underpinning value systems, goals, beliefs, and worldviews need to be changed to leverage the sustainability transformation within the human society, as they define how humans interact with nature, generate knowledge and technologies, and utilize natural and artificial resources. Therefore, the humanistic values of this era demand the inclusion of environmental sustainability, and building an eco-surplus culture is essential for the social transition away from eco-deficit dystopia. In contributing to the generation of knowledge that aids the social transitions toward an eco-surplus utopia, the Topical Collection welcomes viewpoints, reviews, and theoretical and empirical work that are related but not limited to these issues:

• Socio-cultural and economic issues that help mitigate and adapt to climate change and prevent biodiversity loss

• Socio-cultural and economic issues that support the development and implementation of nature-based solutions and artificial technologies for achieving environmental sustainability

• Factors that help restore the connection between nature and humans, such as science, art, literature, and lived experiences

• The psychology towards climate change, biodiversity loss, social transition, and technological transformation

• The roles of creativity, serendipity, and knowledge management in sustainability transformation

• Sustainable financing mechanism for climate change mitigation and adaptation as well as biodiversity conservation

• The roles of urban and rural humans in addressing climate change and biodiversity loss

• Global agreement, national commitments, and local actions for addressing climate change and biodiversity loss

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG Goals.

Keywords: Nature-human nexus; environmental degradation; climate change; biodiversity loss; community science; citizen science; artificial intelligence; technology; innovations; knowledge management; humanities; adaptation and mitigation; conservation; finance

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 31, 2025