Restoring Nature: Europe’s Commitment to Ecosystems and Biodiversity

From restoring wetlands to boosting pollinator recovery while expanding renewable energies, this study explores the ongoing gaps in EU energy and agricultural policies to achieve the targets of the "newborn" Nature Restoration Law. Can we align these policies to protect ecosystems in EU and beyond?

Published in Social Sciences

Restoring Nature: Europe’s Commitment to Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Assessing the EU27 Potential to Meet the Nature Restoration Law Targets - Environmental Management

The Nature Restoration Law adopted by the European Union in 2024 aims to implement measures to restore at least 20% of its land and sea by 2030 and all ecosystems in need of restoration by 2050, focusing on among others agricultural land, forests, urban, marine, freshwater, and wetlands areas. The goal is to enhance the natural and semi-natural habitats’ role in achieving climate targets and preserving biodiversity. Member States must submit detailed national restoration plans, outlining specific actions and mechanisms for monitoring progress. However, these plans should align with the ongoing Common Agricultural Policy and National Energy and Climate Plans objectives. Using data from European Commission reports and applying a semantic interval scale methodology, this study quantifies each Member State’s ambitions and effectiveness under the National Energy Climate Plans and Common Agricultural Policy and establishes a benchmark for reporting under the Nature Restoration Law. The findings reveal the National Energy Climate Plans’ wide disparities in implementing decarbonization measures, climate change adaptation and the implementation of nature-based solutions. The Common Agricultural Policy Plans exhibit only partial commitment to greening agriculture, yet their alignment with Nature Restoration Law objectives varies. Therefore, timely coordination between the three strategies is crucial to avoid conflicting goals, overlapping efforts, and wasting time and resources, ensuring the success of restoration actions.

The European Union’s Nature Restoration Law (NRL), adopted in August 2024, sets ambitious goals to restore 20% of degraded ecosystems by 2030 and all ecosystems in need by 2050. This initiative emphasizes restoring wetlands, forests, grasslands, rivers, and marine areas while integrating nature-based solutions to address climate change and biodiversity loss. However, these actions should align with the ongoing National Energy and Climate Plans (NEPCs), which regulate how EU countries will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, use more renewable energy like wind and solar and save energy, and the Common Agricultural Policy Plans (CAP), which focus on how farming and rural areas can be made more sustainable. These plans help farmers adopt eco-friendly practices, protect nature, and make sure that food production doesn’t harm the environment.

Therefore, some of the ecosystem preservation and recovery actions required by the NRL might already be covered under the CAP and NECP frameworks. This is why my research aimed to investigate the measures currently in place to ensure that NRL reporting complements these efforts. Instead of duplicating actions, the NRL reporting should identify and fill gaps or highlight and implement entirely new initiatives.

Research Findings. The study reveals a significant gap between the EU's climate and environmental targets and the implementation of effective measures, particularly in land use, agriculture, and renewable energy integration. While some EU countries align NECPs and CAP Plans with NRL targets, many lack detailed, actionable strategies, especially for pollinator restoration, marine ecosystems, and urban greening. To meet the 2030 and 2050 goals, policymakers must enhance cross-plan integration, allocate resources effectively, and ensure robust, targeted measures in all areas. Hereafter are some more detailed results!

Synergies and GapsCAPs have shown particular strength in managing habitats like wetlands and forests connected to agricultural areas. They promote practices that protect soil health, maintain water quality, and support diverse landscapes. However, these plans often lack specificity in their measures. On the other side, NECP plans set specific goals and actions to implement Renewable Energy and, for instance, decarbonization of the transport sector, but lack a detailed impact of such actions on the natural and urban environment.

Addressing Pollinator Decline

Both NECPs and CAPs aim to reduce pesticide use and promote biodiversity, but they fall short when addressing one of the most pressing ecological issues: the decline of pollinators. Pollinators, like bees and butterflies, play a vital role in pollinating flowering plants and many crops, including fruits, vegetables, and nuts. Without them, agricultural yields would reduce even more drastically, leading to food shortages and higher prices. While both plans hint on the need to reduce pesticide use, neither includes explicit strategies for reversing pollinator decline by 2030. This is an urgent gap that must be filled to protect the future of agriculture and food security in Europe and beyond.

Urban Ecosystems and Greening Initiatives

Another area where both plans need improvement is urban ecosystems. Urban greening—such as planting trees, creating parks, and enhancing green infrastructure—is crucial for restoring biodiversity and making cities more resilient to climate change. Yet, urban greening is barely mentioned in the NECPs or the CAPs. With the introduction of the NRL, EU countries now have an opportunity to establish clear urban greening initiatives within the NRL reporting. These could include ensuring no net loss of green spaces, promoting urban-rural linkages, and integrating nature into city planning. Such efforts would benefit people and the planet by creating healthier, more sustainable urban environments.

Marine and Freshwater RestorationTo marine and freshwater ecosystems, the CAPs offer more detailed actions for sustainable water management and agricultural practices that can help restore rivers and protect coastal areas. For instance, the NRL sets a target of restoring 25,000 kilometers of free-flowing rivers. While the NECPs address some aspects of river basin management, CAPs take a more comprehensive approach to freshwater management. Aligning these efforts with the EU’s Marine Strategy Framework Directive, which focuses on reducing pollution and restoring marine biodiversity, could amplify their positive impact on water resources and marine ecosystems.

Forest Restoration and Carbon Sinks

The NRL’s focus on forests and wetlands restoration is another critical area where synergy between the plans could make a big difference. Forests and wetlands are not only valuable habitats for wildlife but also vital carbon sinks that help mitigate climate change. However, many NECPs lack detail on nature-based solutions related to afforestation and forest and wetlands management. CAPs include measures for forest conservation and agroforestry but need to be more ambitious and specific. Restoration efforts should prioritize increasing forest connectivity, enhancing deadwood levels, and planting trees in targeted areas. These steps would improve biodiversity while also boosting forests’ and wetlands capacity to store carbon.

Fieldworks with my colleagues of Istituto di Geoscienze and Georisorse while assessing wetlands carbon sink potential at the Delta del Po Park, Ferrara (IT)
Fieldworks with my colleagues of Istituto di Geoscienze and Georisorse - Italian National Research Council while assessing wetlands carbon sink potential at the Delta del Po Park, Ferrara , Italy.
Thanks to Paola, Antonello,Ilaria B, Silvia, Alexandra and Anna that inspired this work 

Why a Nature Resoration Law is Necessary to Balancing Nature and ProgressThe stakes could not be higher. Ecosystem restoration is not just about protecting nature for its own sake; it is also about ensuring a healthy planet for future generations. Ecosystems provide essential services, such as clean air and water, fertile soil, and climate regulation. They also support economic activities, from agriculture to tourism, and contribute to human well-being in countless ways. By committing to the ambitious goals of the NRL, the EU is showing the will to balance environmental protection with circular economic and social progress.

Moving Forward: Aligning Plans for SuccessHowever, achieving these goals will require coordinated action and clear strategies. The gaps identified in NECPs and CAPs highlight the need for better alignment between these plans and the NRL’s objectives. This includes developing explicit strategies for pollinator conservation, establishing urban greening initiatives, and enhancing restoration efforts in forests, rivers, and marine areas. The NRL’s reporting framework will play a crucial role in tracking progress and ensuring that all EU countries contribute to the shared goals. Through policy-driven action and international cooperation, it is possible to heal the planet and create a sustainable future not only for Europe, for the World.

You can read about all the details of my study in the full paper here.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Environmental Policy
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Social Policy > Environmental Policy

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Special Issue: Cumulative effects assessment, monitoring & management: State-of-the-art

The cumulative effects of natural and human-induced disturbances to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems are among the most pervasive issues facing environmental management. Many of the policies and instruments in place to deal with cumulative effects function at local scales and often in response to specific resource development proposals, such as regulatory environmental and socioeconomic impact assessments. There has emerged in recent years a recognized need amongst the practitioner, scholarly, and decision maker communities to advance cumulative effects assessment, monitoring, and management efforts to more regional (e.g. ecosystem, watershed) scales. Doing so requires new tools and technologies, big data, regulatory and policy innovation, collaboration and partnerships, and a greater role for social considerations and Indigenous knowledge systems.

This Special Issue of Environmental Management is focused on innovations in cumulative effects assessment, monitoring, and management. We are interested in papers from all sectors and disciplines, with special attention to the following topics:

•Theoretical or conceptual advances in cumulative effects principles and frameworks

•Innovations in cumulative effects assessment methods or monitoring

•Regional frameworks for cumulative effects assessment, monitoring, or management

•Governance and institutional arrangements for improved cumulative effects analysis or management

•Determining thresholds or limits to support cumulative effects decisions

•Spatial tools and information management for assessing and characterizing cumulative effects

•Regulatory challenges and opportunities for improving cumulative effects management

•Social and cultural dimensions of cumulative effects, including legacy effects and Indigenous knowledge systems

•Lessons from innovative case studies and applications in cumulative effects assessment, monitoring or management, including Indigenous-led initiatives

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Dec 31, 2025

Solutions for Global Sustainability in Hydropower: Balancing Water Use, Ecology, and Community Benefit

Hydropower remains a vital part of the global energy transition, offering renewable and flexible electricity generation. However, its sustainable development requires innovative approaches not only in technology and policy, but also in planning and management—to effectively balance economic viability, ecological integrity, and social responsibility. This collection will bring together a diverse community of researchers, practitioners, and policymakers committed to advancing sustainable hydropower development and integrated water and energy management—particularly in light of accelerating climate challenges and the growing demand for resilient, cross-sectoral solutions. The collection presents actionable, peer-reviewed contributions drawn from the 3rd International Conference on Sustainability in Hydropower (SUSHP2025; https://sushp2025.boku.ac.at/), held in Vienna, Austria, and online from 2–5 September 2025.

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Mar 01, 2026