Sociological impacts of energy management at Tema Oil Refinery. Discover Environment
Published in Earth & Environment and Sustainability
Sociological Impacts of Energy Management at Tema Oil Refine
This study explores how social factors like age, gender, education, and work experience influence how employees at Tema Oil Refinery (TOR) in Ghana perceive and respond to energy management practices. While most energy research focuses on technology or cost, this study highlights the human and sociological side of energy efficiency—showing that people’s backgrounds shape how they engage with environmental efforts.
Why Energy Management Matters
Energy Management Systems (EMS) help companies like TOR monitor and reduce energy use to lower costs and reduce pollution. These systems are especially important in large industries that consume high amounts of energy and release pollutants. With global attention on climate change and sustainability, EMS plays a crucial role in meeting international goals like those in the Paris Agreement. However, for such systems to work well, employees need to understand, support, and participate in them.
How the Study Was Done
The research used a mixed-methods approach, combining both quantitative (numbers) and qualitative (opinions) data. Fifty staff members from five key departments at TOR were surveyed using a structured questionnaire. Questions focused on their views about pollution control, energy-saving strategies, and their own participation in these processes. Demographic details such as gender, age, education, and job experience were also collected.
Key Findings
-
Gender Differences
Men and women view TOR’s energy strategies differently. Women tended to rate the refinery’s pollution control efforts more critically. This may indicate that environmental communication and engagement strategies at TOR do not equally reach all groups. Including more diverse perspectives in planning and evaluation can lead to more effective policies.
-
Age and Experience
Younger workers generally had a more positive view of TOR’s energy initiatives than older ones. Similarly, those with less work experience were more optimistic. Long-term employees were more skeptical, possibly due to past experiences with unfulfilled initiatives. This highlights the importance of regular engagement with experienced staff, whose insights can be valuable for long-term improvement.
-
Education Levels
Education made a significant difference. Employees with higher education—especially those with master’s degrees—were more critical of TOR’s strategies. Their expectations for strong environmental policies were higher, showing that technical knowledge increases scrutiny. TOR needs to adjust its communication and training efforts based on employees’ educational backgrounds to ensure broader support.
Views on Environmental Strategies
Employees were asked to assess various pollution control strategies. The results were mixed:
- Measures to address soil and water pollution were seen as somewhat effective.
- Air pollution strategies received lower ratings, signaling a need for better controls.
- Many respondents were undecided, suggesting a communication gap about what actions TOR is taking.
Insights Across Groups
- Men rated TOR’s efforts more positively than women, who remained more skeptical.
- Younger workers expressed lower confidence in pollution control strategies than older workers.
- Higher-educated employees were more likely to question TOR’s practices, showing a need for stronger accountability.
These differences show that energy strategies are not “one-size-fits-all.” People’s backgrounds affect how they view company efforts and whether they participate fully in energy-saving practices.
Recommendations
The study offers several ways TOR—and other similar companies—can improve employee engagement and the success of energy strategies:
- Gender-Inclusive Communication: Policies should be communicated in ways that consider gender-specific concerns and experiences.
- Age-Specific Training: Younger and older employees may require different approaches to understand and support energy initiatives.
- Experience-Based Engagement: Involving long-term employees in decision-making helps tap into institutional knowledge and rebuild trust.
- Education-Sensitive Materials: Tailoring materials to different education levels can improve understanding and buy-in.
- Clear Feedback Channels: Regular updates on progress and open channels for employee input help build ownership and accountability.
Conclusion
This study shows that effective energy management depends not just on technology, but on people. Gender, age, education, and job experience all influence how employees at TOR understand and engage with energy policies. If management recognizes these differences and adapts strategies accordingly, energy initiatives are more likely to succeed.
TOR and industries like it must treat their workers not just as users of energy systems, but as active participants. By combining strong technical measures with inclusive, people-centered approaches, companies can achieve better energy efficiency, lower environmental impact, and greater workplace engagement.
Follow the Topic
-
Discover Environment
This is a transdisciplinary, open-access journal that provides a leading platform for the rapid dissemination of knowledge and advances covering the research and innovation that is taking place across the environmental sector.
What are SDG Topics?
An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.
Continue reading announcementRelated Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Water Environment: Addressing Global Water Challenges
Water is an indispensable natural resource, yet it faces escalating threats from pollution, climate change, and human activity. The Water Environment: Addressing Global Water Challenges section of Discover Environment Journal is dedicated to publishing innovative research on the dynamics of water systems—tracing their journey from source to fate while examining the interplay between natural processes and anthropogenic influences. This section delves into critical domains, including chemical hydrology, watershed and basin science, glacier environments, and land-use impacts. We welcome contributions that address pressing issues such as water pollution, the transport and transformation of contaminants, hydrological modeling, and sustainable water management strategies. We place particular emphasis on the consequences of land-use changes on hydrological cycles, the stability of glacier-fed water systems, and effective approaches to safeguarding freshwater and marine ecosystems.
Key topics include:
Chemical Hydrology: Analysis of water composition, pollutant behavior, and geochemical interactions shaping water quality.
Basin and Catchment Science: Investigations into watershed hydrology, sediment transport, and hydrogeomorphological processes.
Glacier Environments: Research on cryospheric hydrology, glacier-fed rivers, and the influence of climate change on water availability.
Land-Use Systems: Examining the effects of agriculture, urbanization, deforestation, and industry on water resources.
Water Pollution & Remediation: Addressing emerging contaminants (e.g., microplastics, pharmaceuticals, PFAS), nature-based solutions, and policy frameworks for water protection.
Sustainable Water Management: Innovations in water conservation, resilience-building strategies, and alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation).
Methodological advancement in water research
Furthermore, to enhance the scope and impact of the section, we strongly encourage submissions that:
• Include case studies from underrepresented regions, particularly Sub-Saharan Africa and small island states, to showcase diverse hydrological challenges and locally relevant water management solutions.
• Promote the integration of traditional ecological knowledge and community-based water governance practices to enhance the cultural relevance and sustainability of proposed water stewardship strategies.
• Explore transboundary water issues, including shared aquifers and river basins, to highlight the importance of cooperation and policy in sustainable resource management.
• Emphasize the value of coupling remote sensing and GIS technologies with in-situ hydrological data for improved water quality monitoring and modeling accuracy across scales.
• Focus on emerging contaminants such as microplastics, pharmaceuticals, and PFAS in both freshwater and marine environments, reflecting current global research priorities.
• Give greater attention to groundwater-surface water interactions and their implications for long-term water availability, especially under changing climate and land-use patterns.
• Highlight the role of climate change scenarios and projections in shaping adaptive water management frameworks, particularly in glacier-fed and drought-prone regions.
• Feature interdisciplinary collaborations between hydrologists, ecologists, social scientists, and engineers to propose holistic and inclusive water resource solutions.
• Promote alignment of all submissions with SDG targets, especially SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and SDG 13 (Climate Action), to strengthen policy relevance.
• Include policy briefs or synthesis articles that translate technical findings into actionable guidance for water managers and decision-makers.
By fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and highlighting diverse perspectives, the Water Environment: Addressing Global Water Challenges section serves as a vital platform for advancing knowledge on global water challenges and informing policy for sustainable water stewardship.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to: SDG 6 & SDG 13
Keywords: Water Systems, Water Pollution, Climate Change, Land-Use Impacts, Sustainable Water Management, Emerging Contaminants, Hydrological Modeling, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), Chemical Hydrology, Watershed Science, and Glacier Environments.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jun 30, 2026
Monitoring environmental pollution and impact on health
The intensification of human activities and the expansion and densification of urban areas cause various damages to the environment, necessitating continuous monitoring to assess the impact and extent of potential risks to both the environment and human health, in order to ensure urban sustainability.
This collection, “Monitoring Environmental Pollution and Impact on Health,” invites contributions that utilize tools related to health impact assessment, human health risk, ecological risk, data modeling, geospatial data, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to analyze impacts within urban environments. We also encourage the publication of research on the dynamics of pollution and health in rural and peri-urban areas, interdisciplinary studies between environmental sciences and public health, epidemiology, and urban planning for a holistic assessment of the multifaceted impacts of pollution on human well-being. In addition, studies that contribute actionable policy recommendations for local governments, environmental agencies, or public health institutions dealing with urban pollution are welcome. Research (time series or longitudinal studies) that demonstrate public health trends related to chronic exposure to pollutants, aiming for a better understanding of long-term urban sustainability issues, are also encouraged. Studies addressing health risks for vulnerable populations (such as children, the elderly, or low-income communities) exposed to environmental pollution in densely populated areas are of particular interest. We welcome studies on participatory monitoring and the development of citizen science, empowering communities to act in collaboration with local environmental health surveillance managers. Research involving satellite pollution monitoring and remote sensing is also encouraged. Comparative studies on pollution and health across different regions, identifying critical hotspots and globally replicable mitigation strategies, are of interest. We also welcome research that investigates environmental justice and urban socio-demographic inequalities/disparities in health due to environmental pollution. Review studies and meta-analyses exploring trends, methodologies, and gaps in urban environmental health research are also welcome.
Keywords: Health impact assessment, Environmental quality monitoring (air, water, and soil), Pollution sources and emissions, Spatial analysis, Geospatial technology, Climate change, Urban sustainability, Machine learning, Ecological risk assessment, Human health risk assessment
This Collection supports and amplifies research aligned with the following Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): SDG 11.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Aug 31, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in