Sociological impacts of energy management at Tema Oil Refinery. Discover Environment
Published in Earth & Environment and Sustainability
Sociological Impacts of Energy Management at Tema Oil Refine
This study explores how social factors like age, gender, education, and work experience influence how employees at Tema Oil Refinery (TOR) in Ghana perceive and respond to energy management practices. While most energy research focuses on technology or cost, this study highlights the human and sociological side of energy efficiency—showing that people’s backgrounds shape how they engage with environmental efforts.
Why Energy Management Matters
Energy Management Systems (EMS) help companies like TOR monitor and reduce energy use to lower costs and reduce pollution. These systems are especially important in large industries that consume high amounts of energy and release pollutants. With global attention on climate change and sustainability, EMS plays a crucial role in meeting international goals like those in the Paris Agreement. However, for such systems to work well, employees need to understand, support, and participate in them.
How the Study Was Done
The research used a mixed-methods approach, combining both quantitative (numbers) and qualitative (opinions) data. Fifty staff members from five key departments at TOR were surveyed using a structured questionnaire. Questions focused on their views about pollution control, energy-saving strategies, and their own participation in these processes. Demographic details such as gender, age, education, and job experience were also collected.
Key Findings
-
Gender Differences
Men and women view TOR’s energy strategies differently. Women tended to rate the refinery’s pollution control efforts more critically. This may indicate that environmental communication and engagement strategies at TOR do not equally reach all groups. Including more diverse perspectives in planning and evaluation can lead to more effective policies.
-
Age and Experience
Younger workers generally had a more positive view of TOR’s energy initiatives than older ones. Similarly, those with less work experience were more optimistic. Long-term employees were more skeptical, possibly due to past experiences with unfulfilled initiatives. This highlights the importance of regular engagement with experienced staff, whose insights can be valuable for long-term improvement.
-
Education Levels
Education made a significant difference. Employees with higher education—especially those with master’s degrees—were more critical of TOR’s strategies. Their expectations for strong environmental policies were higher, showing that technical knowledge increases scrutiny. TOR needs to adjust its communication and training efforts based on employees’ educational backgrounds to ensure broader support.
Views on Environmental Strategies
Employees were asked to assess various pollution control strategies. The results were mixed:
- Measures to address soil and water pollution were seen as somewhat effective.
- Air pollution strategies received lower ratings, signaling a need for better controls.
- Many respondents were undecided, suggesting a communication gap about what actions TOR is taking.
Insights Across Groups
- Men rated TOR’s efforts more positively than women, who remained more skeptical.
- Younger workers expressed lower confidence in pollution control strategies than older workers.
- Higher-educated employees were more likely to question TOR’s practices, showing a need for stronger accountability.
These differences show that energy strategies are not “one-size-fits-all.” People’s backgrounds affect how they view company efforts and whether they participate fully in energy-saving practices.
Recommendations
The study offers several ways TOR—and other similar companies—can improve employee engagement and the success of energy strategies:
- Gender-Inclusive Communication: Policies should be communicated in ways that consider gender-specific concerns and experiences.
- Age-Specific Training: Younger and older employees may require different approaches to understand and support energy initiatives.
- Experience-Based Engagement: Involving long-term employees in decision-making helps tap into institutional knowledge and rebuild trust.
- Education-Sensitive Materials: Tailoring materials to different education levels can improve understanding and buy-in.
- Clear Feedback Channels: Regular updates on progress and open channels for employee input help build ownership and accountability.
Conclusion
This study shows that effective energy management depends not just on technology, but on people. Gender, age, education, and job experience all influence how employees at TOR understand and engage with energy policies. If management recognizes these differences and adapts strategies accordingly, energy initiatives are more likely to succeed.
TOR and industries like it must treat their workers not just as users of energy systems, but as active participants. By combining strong technical measures with inclusive, people-centered approaches, companies can achieve better energy efficiency, lower environmental impact, and greater workplace engagement.
Follow the Topic
-
Discover Environment
This is a transdisciplinary, open-access journal that provides a leading platform for the rapid dissemination of knowledge and advances covering the research and innovation that is taking place across the environmental sector.
What are SDG Topics?
An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.
Continue reading announcementRelated Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Mapping Sustainability: Geospatial Tools for Environmental Challenges
The escalating complexity of global ecological challenges demands innovative approaches to understanding, monitoring, and managing the environment. Geospatial technologies, including Geographic Information Systems (GIS), remote sensing, and spatial analytics, have become indispensable tools in addressing these issues. These technologies have demonstrated remarkable impact across various domains. For instance, in disaster management, the NASA-Disaster Response Coordination System utilizes satellite imagery and GIS analytics to assess damages from natural calamities, while the Copernicus Emergency Management Service (EMS) provides real-time mapping and early warning systems. In biodiversity conservation, initiatives like Global Forest Watch (GFW) and the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT) employ satellite data and spatial datasets to monitor deforestation and support conservation planning. Additionally, in urban sustainability, projects such as the Landsat Urban Heat Mapping Initiative help urban planners mitigate rising temperatures through targeted green infrastructure solutions.
This collection, "Mapping Sustainability: Geospatial Tools for Environmental Challenges," addresses critical gaps in the current literature by showcasing pioneering research that leverages geospatial technologies to confront urgent environmental issues. While existing research extensively explores geospatial methods, there is a significant need for more integrated, interdisciplinary approaches that translate data-driven insights into actionable solutions for sustainability. This collection advances the field by bridging science and policy, enhancing urban sustainability, advancing climate resilience, promoting data-driven conservation, and innovating spatial decision support systems (SDSS). Contributions that emphasize interdisciplinary research, innovative case studies, global perspectives, and policy insights are highly encouraged.
Keywords:Geospatial Technologies; Environmental Sustainability; Climate Change Analysis; Biodiversity Conservation; Pollution Monitoring; Water Resource Management; Spatial Data Analytics; Sustainable Development; Ecological Resilience; Geospatial Modeling; Spatial Decision Support Systems (SDSS); Remote Sensing Applications; Sustainable Urban Planning; Land Use and Land Cover Change (LULC); Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR); Ecosystem Monitoring; GIS-based Policy Analysis; Smart Cities and Resilient Infrastructure
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jan 31, 2027
Monitoring environmental pollution and impact on health
The intensification of human activities and the expansion and densification of urban areas cause various damages to the environment, necessitating continuous monitoring to assess the impact and extent of potential risks to both the environment and human health, in order to ensure urban sustainability.
This collection, “Monitoring Environmental Pollution and Impact on Health,” invites contributions that utilize tools related to health impact assessment, human health risk, ecological risk, data modeling, geospatial data, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to analyze impacts within urban environments. We also encourage the publication of research on the dynamics of pollution and health in rural and peri-urban areas, interdisciplinary studies between environmental sciences and public health, epidemiology, and urban planning for a holistic assessment of the multifaceted impacts of pollution on human well-being. In addition, studies that contribute actionable policy recommendations for local governments, environmental agencies, or public health institutions dealing with urban pollution are welcome. Research (time series or longitudinal studies) that demonstrate public health trends related to chronic exposure to pollutants, aiming for a better understanding of long-term urban sustainability issues, are also encouraged. Studies addressing health risks for vulnerable populations (such as children, the elderly, or low-income communities) exposed to environmental pollution in densely populated areas are of particular interest. We welcome studies on participatory monitoring and the development of citizen science, empowering communities to act in collaboration with local environmental health surveillance managers. Research involving satellite pollution monitoring and remote sensing is also encouraged. Comparative studies on pollution and health across different regions, identifying critical hotspots and globally replicable mitigation strategies, are of interest. We also welcome research that investigates environmental justice and urban socio-demographic inequalities/disparities in health due to environmental pollution. Review studies and meta-analyses exploring trends, methodologies, and gaps in urban environmental health research are also welcome.
Keywords: Health impact assessment, Environmental quality monitoring (air, water, and soil), Pollution sources and emissions, Spatial analysis, Geospatial technology, Climate change, Urban sustainability, Machine learning, Ecological risk assessment, Human health risk assessment
This Collection supports and amplifies research aligned with the following Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): SDG 11.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Feb 28, 2027
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in