The conundrum of erasing digital footprints: A regulatory challenge

Technology advances, the idea of deleting one’s digital traces sparked discussions and worries. Digital material can persist permanently, may be simply found through search engines. The mechanisms like auto suggest, and machine learning contribute to information leakage through search engines.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

The conundrum of erasing digital footprints: A regulatory challenge - Jindal Global Law Review

As technology advances, the idea of deleting one’s digital traces has sparked discussions, and worries. Now, digital material can persist permanently and may be simply found through search engines. The mechanisms like auto suggest, and machine learning contribute to information leakage through search engines. This prompts consideration of how individuals can efficiently oversee their online presence, and maintain authority over their personal data. To solve this concern, Europe has remedied it by recognising the principle of the right to be forgotten (hereinafter mentioned as RTBF), and given primacy to individual privacy, or the public’s interest in information. Unlike Europe, the United States of America gives primacy to information access as well as freedom of speech and believes the RTBF conflicts with the First Amendment. The concept of the RTBF under different nomenclatures has evolved as a kind of possible approach to address the side effects of digital footprints across the globe. Meanwhile, India has recently introduced the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, which gives a place to the right to erasure. The review of the literature reveals a dearth of research analysis on Indian jurisprudence around the new data protection law, and RTBF. The research explores whether the RTBF finds a place in Indian jurisprudence. The authors gain a better grasp of the study by contrasting the Indian regulatory framework with its Western counterparts and propose possible directions for future research.

The importance of removing digital footprints has grown in the modern era.
 The necessity to monitor, and control individuals’ personal data has increased in tandem with the proliferation of internet users. An individual’s online presence can jeopardize their reputation, leaving them susceptible to identity theft, and prone to 
digital fraud. Particularly concerning is the fact that digital data is ever-present, and 
permanent, which presents formidable obstacles to privacy, and security. It took a 
few decades to realize that the internet never forgets. The online activities of individuals are generating multiple sets of digital footprints in an ever-growing digital society. Sir Winston Churchill once said inter alia, ‘We have control over the words 
we don’t say, but we are bound by the ones we speak’. This historical lesson is having a profound impact on the digital world today.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Data Privacy
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Science and Technology Studies > Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) > Data Science > Data Privacy
Media Law
Humanities and Social Sciences > Media and Communication > Media Law

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Legal Empowerment of the Poor

Poverty remains a persistent challenge in numerous countries, impacting significant proportions of their populations. Poverty reduction has been the goal for not only national governments, but also for international, multilateral and regional organizations. Governments and international organizations implemented a variety of poverty reduction strategies and, in some selected country contexts, they have been successful.

There has been agreement at the global level that poverty manifests itself multidimensionally, and it does not mean lack of income and wealth only. Poverty, as lack of choices and opportunities in life, is an important dimension that influences all other dimensions of poverty, such as access to health and education. Self-empowerment of an individual is necessary for them to be able to exercise choices and access opportunities.

Law has been used as a strategy for poverty eradication, but the approaches have always been top-down where people were treated as beneficiaries, giving little scope to improve their agency and choice. Moreover, the focus of these strategies was legal institutions and lawyers rather than people. Furthermore, another limitation to these strategies was that these were implemented in selected countries’ contexts only.

Legal empowerment of the poor presented a viable alternative in the 2000s when it came to the forefront for the first time. Empowerment has been a buzzword in academia and non-profit sector over the last few decades. However, legal empowerment of the poor has not received much attention. The very first Sustainable Development Goal aspires to end poverty in all its form everywhere. CLEP believes that legal empowerment of the poor holds the key to achieve this goal. In the legal self-empowerment of the poor, external actors build the capacity of poor communities to take action in the areas of access to justice and the rule of law; and property, labour and business rights. Prerequisites such as legal identity, voice, information and awareness support the process.

To initiate a discussion amongst various stakeholders on the above stated aspects and to explore and strengthen ideas for legal empowerment of the poor, CLEP, together with Jindal Global Law Review, proposes to organise a symposium at JGU during the fall semester of 2024. Presentations made in the symposium will be developed as articles for peer reviewed special issue of JGLR. Additionally, some articles will be invited from eminent persons contributing to the field of legal empowerment especially from India and the global south.

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Dec 31, 2025