the epical scientific research of "Scientific Equation of Humanistic Labor"
Published in Social Sciences
Since childhood, the blood and tears of disastrous peasant (namely the unearned gain of the extreme polarization that labor price may be countless times labor value) have been curiously heeded;
In 2017, the mathematical models for the distribution of labor value (videlicet Chapter 1) were contemplated through thought experiment and were drafted (in prison);
In 2018, the mathematical models for the fluctuation of labor price and management of labor (namely Chapter 2 and 3) were written;
In 2021 (after liberation from prison), the aforementioned chapters were recultivated (from memory), the drafts written on scrap paper were looted (in prison);
In 2024, the mathematical models for the price remuneration and intelligent traceability of labor were cultivated;
In 2025, the literature was annotated, the research was revised, the article was submitted for publication. (imprisonment as before without rehabilitation)
Follow the Topic
Introducing: Social Science Matters
Social Science Matters is a campaign from the team at Palgrave Macmillan that aims to increase the visibility and impact of the social sciences
Continue reading announcement
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in
🔬👏 Very interesting work on the scientific equation of humanistic labor. I appreciate how you address the relationship between labor value, its price, and social welfare. It’s a valuable framework for measuring and improving economic justice.
From our perspective, every economic fact is ultimately human. While traditional proxies—like price, income, or productivity—are useful to study outcomes and consequences, they don’t fully capture the main variable: humanity and real human progress.
At ISHEA, we propose complementing these models with what we call biophysical economics, which allows us to understand system resilience—the capacity to sustain progress and wellbeing beyond conventional indicators. This doesn’t replace classical economics; it expands it, showing how deep causes—energy, social friction, and bio-physical constraints—shape the results you measure.
💡 In short: measuring labor price and value tells us what happened, but looking through a biophysical economics lens helps us understand why it happened and how to sustain it over time.
Thank you for opening this discussion; it’s a valuable contribution to thinking about more complete models of human progress.
#HumanLabor #BiophysicalEconomics #SystemResilience #SustainableProgress #ScienceCommunication #ISHEA