The genetic contribution of genetics to food addiction
Published in Chemistry, Genetics & Genomics, and General & Internal Medicine
This study emerged from a fundamental puzzle in eating-behaviour research: why do some individuals with obesity exhibit patterns of compulsive food consumption and psychological symptoms that resemble addiction, while others with similar body mass index (BMI) do not? Although the concept of food addiction has gained interest in recent decades, it remains controversial and poorly understood, especially at a biological level. Traditional explanations often focus on calorie balance, environmental exposure to processed foods, or psychosocial stressors alone. With this study we wanted to integrate genetic mechanisms into this broader picture to see whether variation in genes known to regulate appetite and reward might help explain individual differences in addictive-like eating behaviour.
The investigation focuses on the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) gene, which plays a key role in the brain’s regulation of satiety, reward, and energy balance. Prior studies have linked MC4R variants to obesity and eating behaviours, but direct genetic associations with clinically defined food addiction had not yet been rigorously tested among people with obesity. By genotyping multiple MC4R polymorphisms (including rs17782313) in a clinical sample of people seeking weight-loss treatment and comparing those with versus without food addiction based on validated diagnostic scales, our group aimed to bridge molecular variation with behavioural phenotype.
The main finding was relevant: one MC4R variant (rs17782313) showed a robust association with food addiction. Specifically, carriers of the C allele were not only more likely than non-carriers to meet criteria for food addiction, and, noteworthy, they also had higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms, dimensions that are often intertwined with compulsive eating.This finding suggests that genetic variation in a key appetite regulation pathway contributes not only to patterns of loss of control over eating but also to associated affective symptoms.
Scientifically, these results underscore that eating behaviours and obesity are not reducible to simple external factors or conscious decision making alone. Instead, individual biological predispositions interact with psychological and environmental influences to shape how people respond to food rewards and regulate intake. The results encourage moving beyond a purely behavioural or environmental framing of obesity, positioning genetic insights as a tool for more nuanced risk stratification and potentially tailored interventions.
From a clinical point of view, the study stresses the importance of recognizing heterogeneity within obesity as some patients may struggle with patterns resembling addiction because of inherent differences in reward-related circuitry, not just lifestyle or willpower. Understanding these peculiarities can help refine assessment, reduce stigma, and design supportive interventions that account for underlying biological vulnerabilities.
In essence, the paper invites the clinicians and researchers to rethink food addiction from a metaphor derived from substance use to a genetic-informed behavioural phenotype that, if validated in future studies, could link molecular neuroscience with real-world therapeutic strategies.
Follow the Topic
-
Journal of Eating Disorders
This is the first Gold open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Not a Monolith: Identifying Meaningful Heterogeneity in Eating Disorder Symptoms Among LGBTQ+ Populations
Eating disorders within LGBTQ+ populations do not follow a singular pattern; instead, they reflect a rich and complex interplay of identities, lived experiences, and social contexts that demand nuanced, intersectional inquiry. This Collection seeks to identify meaningful heterogeneity in eating disorder symptoms by examining diverse identities, lived experiences, social group memberships (e.g., clan membership, subcultural appearance identifications, sexual self-labelling), and the role of various social contexts that LGBTQ+ populations occupy to better capture variations in eating disorder symptoms within this community.
Building on this foundation, this Collection investigates unique risk factors, including, but not limited to, sexual and gender minority stress, intraminority stress, and structural stigma, which may contribute to the development or exacerbation of eating disorder symptoms in LGBTQ+ populations. Equally important is the exploration of protective factors—such as community connectedness and pride in identity—that may buffer against these risks and promote interpersonal and psychological strengths.
Finally, this Collection emphasizes the need for prevention and treatment strategies that are culturally competent, inclusive, and responsive to the specific needs of LGBTQ+ populations. By advancing research in these areas, we aim to improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities in eating disorders among the LGBTQ+ community.
We invite researchers to contribute to this special Collection. Topics of interest within LGBTQ+ populations include, but are not limited to:
-Intersectionality and eating disorders
-Identity-based heterogeneity in symptom presentation
-Sexual and gender minority stress
-Intraminority stress
-Structural stigma and its impact on eating disorder risk
-Protective factors such as community connectedness and identity pride
-Prevention strategies tailored for LGBTQ+ individuals
-Inclusive and culturally responsive treatment approaches
-Case studies on diverse experiences in care and recovery
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health and Well-Being.
All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Oct 14, 2026
Hope, Meaning, and Growth in Eating Disorder Recovery
Eating disorder research and clinical literature have historically been dominated by deficit-focused frameworks, privileging symptomatology, impairment, and risk. While this body of work has been critical in advancing understanding and treatment, it has often left less space for exploring recovery as a process of growth, meaning-making, and renewed engagement with life. This Special Issue seeks to redress that imbalance by foregrounding hopeful, strengths-based, and meaning-oriented approaches to eating disorder recovery.
We invite contributions that examine adjunctive therapies, activities, and frameworks that extend beyond symptom reduction to support flourishing, purpose, and connection. This collection aims to capture the breadth of emerging and established approaches that emphasise what makes life worth living in the context of ongoing recovery.
This Special Issue broadly encompasses approaches within the “family” of hopeful and meaning-making interventions, including (but not limited to):
- Recovery-oriented and recovery model frameworks, including lived-experience perspectives
- Post-traumatic growth and resilience-based models
- Positive psychology approaches (e.g., interventions targeting wellbeing, strengths, gratitude, or flourishing)
- Peer support, advocacy, and community engagement as therapeutic processes
- Nature-based and ecotherapy interventions
- Creative, expressive, and arts-based practices
- Meaning-focused and values-based approaches (e.g., purpose, identity reconstruction, existential frameworks)
- Cultural, spiritual, and relational dimensions of recovery
We are particularly interested in work that challenges narrow conceptualisations of recovery as merely the absence of symptoms, and instead explores recovery as a dynamic, multidimensional process involving identity, agency, and meaning.
This Special Issue aims to:
- Expand the evidence base for meaning-oriented and strengths-based approaches in eating disorder care
- Rebalance the discourse by complementing impairment-focused narratives with accounts of hope, agency, and recovery
- Foster interdisciplinary dialogue across psychology, psychiatry, public health, social sciences, and lived experience scholarship
- Encourage critical reflection on the application of positive psychology and related frameworks
- Highlight innovative practices that support individuals in building meaningful, connected, and valued lives
Ultimately, this collection seeks to advance a more holistic understanding of recovery—one that recognises not only the alleviation of distress, but also the cultivation of purpose, identity, and wellbeing.
Primary research papers and systematic reviews are preferred, while comments and narrative reviews will be considered on application.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health and Well-Being, SDG 5, Gender Equality, SDG 10, Reduced Inequalities and SDG 17, Partnerships for the goals.
All submissions in this Collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open-access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee. For more information on publication fees, please see here. We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Mar 01, 2027
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in