The paradox of macrolide resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Despite Pseudomonas aeruginosa being considered intrinsically resistant towards macrolides, they can be effective antibiotics. However, ribosomal mutations drive resistance highlighting the need for updated treatment protocols and vigilant monitoring.

Published in Microbiology

The paradox of macrolide resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Macrolides are a class of antibiotics widely used to treat bacterial infections, especially those caused by Gram-negative pathogens. They are, however, also widely used to treat chronic airway infections caused by the Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotics, such as erythromycin and azithromycin, not only inhibit bacterial growth but also help modulate the immune response, making them valuable for managing chronic respiratory conditions like cystic fibrosis (CF), primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). By binding to the bacterial ribosome, macrolides inhibit protein synthesis, which is crucial for bacterial growth and virulence. Additionally, their immunomodulatory properties help reduce inflammation in the airways, providing significant relief to patients with chronic respiratory diseases.

Despite their widespread use, the effectiveness of macrolides against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a common and stubborn pathogen in these conditions, has been questioned. P. aeruginosa is known for its high intrinsic resistance to many antibiotics, including macrolides, primarily due to its high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in standardized culture media. This resistance has led to the assumption that macrolides are ineffective against P. aeruginosa, resulting in the exclusion of macrolides from routine antibiotic susceptibility testing for this pathogen. Consequently, even though macrolides are frequently prescribed to patients with chronic P. aeruginosa infections, their potential effectiveness and the mechanisms of resistance have not been thoroughly investigated.

Our recent study, challenges this long-held assumption by demonstrating that macrolides can be effective against P. aeruginosa in an air-liquid interface (ALI) infection model, which closely mimics human airway conditions. This model allows for a more accurate assessment of antibiotic efficacy in a setting that replicates the complex environment of the human respiratory tract. Furthermore, we uncover the genetic basis of this acquired macrolide resistance, identifying specific mutations in the ribosomal proteins uL4 and uL22 that confer resistance. These findings have significant implications for the clinical management of P. aeruginosa infections and highlight the need for vigilant resistance monitoring.

Key Findings

  1. Macrolides as Effective Antibiotics: Contrary to the prevailing belief, our research demonstrates that macrolides can effectively combat P. aeruginosa in an air-liquid interface (ALI) infection model, which closely mimics human airway conditions. This finding is pivotal for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), who often receive macrolide treatment.
  2. Ribosomal Mutations and Resistance: We identified specific mutations in the uL4 and uL22 ribosomal proteins that confer resistance to macrolides. These mutations necessitate higher antibiotic concentrations to achieve the desired therapeutic effects, highlighting the need for vigilant resistance monitoring.
  3. Collateral Effects of Mutations: Interestingly, these ribosomal mutations also lead to reduced bacterial growth rate, virulence, and pathogenicity, even in the absence of antibiotics. This dual effect suggests a complex interplay between antibiotic resistance and bacterial fitness.

Implications for Clinical Practice and Future Directions

Our findings underscore the importance of considering macrolides as active antibiotics against P. aeruginosa and the necessity for routine resistance testing. The study also calls for a reevaluation of current treatment protocols to balance the benefits of macrolide therapy with the risk of resistance development.

Further research is needed to explore the long-term implications of ribosomal mutations on bacterial behavior and patient outcomes. Additionally, integrating advanced infection models that include immune system components could provide deeper insights into the host-pathogen interactions and resistance mechanisms. Comprehensive and conclusive analyses are required to update the standard of care guidelines for the utilization of macrolides in managing long-term chronic infections. This will ensure the delivery of optimal patient care while mitigating the development of antibiotic resistance.

Conclusion

This study marks a significant step forward in understanding macrolide resistance in P. aeruginosa. By unraveling the genetic and phenotypic changes associated with ribosomal mutations, we pave the way for more effective treatment strategies and improved patient care.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Clinical Microbiology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Microbiology > Microbial Communities > Clinical Microbiology

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Women's Health

A selection of recent articles that highlight issues relevant to the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders in women.

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Ongoing

Advances in neurodegenerative diseases

This Collection aims to bring together research from various domains related to neurodegenerative conditions, encompassing novel insights into disease pathophysiology, diagnostics, therapeutic developments, and care strategies. We welcome the submission of all papers relevant to advances in neurodegenerative disease.

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Dec 24, 2025