The story behind a simple idea: rethinking headache care as a way to improve population health globally

In an era of changing landscape in global population health, improving the overall health of people suffering from headache disorders will be a feasible way to improve global population health.

Published in Sustainability

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

This is the story behind a recent paper publishes on The Journal of Headache and Pain (Rethinking headache as a global public health case model for reaching the SDG 3 HEALTH by 2030. J Headache Pain. 2023; 24:140), but it is mostly the story of a journey on a mountain. It begun at the end of 2022 and get to its end on October 2023, when the manuscript was finally online.

The paper moves from a simple observation and gets to a simple idea. The observation is the populations’ health is defined by the way in which people experience health conditions that limit their daily lives, and the more a disease is common in the population, the higher the likelihood that it is a main cause of population disability. Headache disorders are common and disabling: so, and here comes the simple idea, if we want to improve populations’ health, we have to improve the health of people who suffer from headache disorders. A simple idea which, however, will have a complex realization: and our paper, rather than practical solutions, presents general guidelines that can be implemented in the future.

Coming back to the story behind this paper…it is not so frequent that a middle-level researcher is given the role and the responsibility to coordinate a group of high-level scientists. Actually, one of the strongest group possible in the field of headache disorders, composed of past, current and future presidents of scientific societies and journal editors. Compared to all of them, I felt like a mouse that had to climb Mount Everest. And by “not so frequent” I mean that it was the first time for me.

When I first was informed about the possibility to work on this manuscript, in which six sub-sections had to be merged in order to give a readable shape to such an enormous amount of content, I was told that I would have to care about one of the sections. It was the end of 2022:  I thought it was prestigious, but manageable, and in fact it was. Someone had however to prepare an introductory section: when I received the formal invitation to join this collective effort, I discovered that this task would have been in charge to me. It was February 2023: I still thought it was prestigious, but manageable, and in fact it was. Then, someone had to collate all the material, which means finding and deleting the inevitable text duplication (some of which surely “escaped” my radar), as well as filling the inevitable gaps, fixing the style and setting the references (a task which might possibly drive anyone crazy): still me, still prestigious, manageable, although hard. And finally, someone had to write down a conclusion. “No one knows this manuscript better than me”, I thought: so, I decided to take this responsibility by myself. A that point I get back to the two senior authors that were in charge to handle the manuscript with me: they took some time for a full reading of the whole manuscript and provided some comments. But you cannot submit such a kind of manuscript without a last revision from the co-authors.

So, the mouse started climbing Mount Everest. I have to admit that it never happened to me to get such a large amount of comments: however, the topic is of high-level importance as it provides a unique opportunity, to a group or individual researchers - and not to a scientific society - to set a policy agenda on how should headache care be organized at the global level. Of course, in principle and not in practice: but the principles behind are strong and a point of balance had to be found. I expected that working with such top-level scientists would have been complex. On previous occasions, I saw people having harsh discussions because the comment they made was not retained. Nothing of this kind happened on this occasion: I saw people providing further explanations to what they wrote, explaining the importance (and the reasons behind the importance) of their opinions. I saw people proving me a true global perspective, especially on what is realistic to write down and what is not, even considering that no practical indications would be given. Clearly, difficulties existed: when you have to coordinate the work with top-level people, you have to be flexible, especially on the agenda of revisions and on the timing to publication.

It was indeed a great opportunity to challenge myself and learn the meaning of serving as group leader, and for this I would like to quote piece of Roberto Benigni’s masterpiece “Life is Beautiful”: You are serving, but you are not a servant. Serving as senior author enabled me to learn something: I learnt that there was no mouse, and no Mount Everest to climb. But, more important, that in this journey I was not alone, but in good company of 25 companions, that before being excellent scientists, are all exceptional persons.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Sustainability
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability

What are SDG Topics?

An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.

Continue reading announcement

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Community pharmacy and headache care

In the sustainable development goals (SDG) context of seeking universal health coverage, the expanding gap between the supply of specialized and primary providers of headache-related health care on the one hand and the care needs of the very large number of people affected by headache on the other is a formidable but not insoluble public-health challenge. Structured headache services provide a cost-effective framework for provision of care but may still be overwhelmed by demand. Community pharmacists are an underutilized resource, potentially well able to provide the solution. This collection aligns with UN SDG-3 (Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages), and more specifically with SDG-3.8 (Achieve universal health coverage ..., access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines ... for all). The collection may include reports (especially comparative studies) on current pharmacy practice (scope, responsibilities and regulatory and other restrictions) relevant to headache care in countries worldwide — especially, but not restricted to, low and lower-middle-income countries; studies of pharmacists' knowledge and understanding of headache disorders and their management, theoretically argued proposals for change that, through educational initiatives, expansion of community pharmacists' scope of practice or by other means, might relieve strained headache-care systems; and studies of workload-shifting in headache care from medical to community pharmacy services (economic evaluations, theoretical or empirical assessments of benefits versus harms, and reports of pilot implementations either in headache care or in other therapeutic areas that might be pathfinders for headache care).

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health & Well-Being.

All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: May 01, 2026

Pathophysiology of Pain in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Pain is a debilitating and often under-recognized symptom of neurodegenerative disorders (NDD), including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). One of the interesting and clinically relevant issues is the bidirectional relationship between pain and NDD. In particular, NDD, like chronic pain, which involves not only peripheral but also central mechanisms, is often associated with neuroinflammation, central and peripheral sensitization, and neuronal degeneration. Such chronic pain may worsen the neurodegenerative process, while acute pain may be overlooked in AD and other conditions associated with cognitive decline. The underlying common and disease-specific molecular mechanisms, likely involving changes in neurotransmitters, ion channels, and glial activation, remain largely unknown. It is not entirely clear whether and how the neurodegenerative process may serve as a cause of pain, creating a vicious circle that significantly affects the quality of life of patients. Headaches, and migraine in particular, may have their own specific interactions with NDD. These unanswered questions require research that should deepen our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of such connections, exploring how these discoveries may inspire the development of targeted therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes.

The current Thematic Series “Pathophysiology of Pain in Neurodegenerative Diseases” invites original papers and review articles primarily devoted to understanding pathophysiological mechanisms linking various types of pain, including migraine, headache and other pain syndromes, with neurodegenerative disorders. This series aims to advance our understanding of these complex associations to promote future research for innovative therapeutic strategies.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health and Well-Being.

All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jun 16, 2026