The hallmarks of migraine: a paper and a wager

The story behind "Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 – migraine"
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 – migraine - The Journal of Headache and Pain

Background and aim Migraine is a common disabling conditions which, globally, affects 15.2% of the population. It is the second cause of health loss in terms of years lived with disability, the first among women. Despite being so common, it is poorly recognised and too often undertreated. Specialty centres and neurologists with specific expertise on headache disorders have the knowledge to provide specific care: however, those who do not regularly treat patients with migraine will benefit from a synopsis on the most relevant and updated information about this condition. This paper presents a comprehensive view on the hallmarks of migraine, from genetics and diagnostic markers, up to treatments and societal impact, and reports the elements that identify migraine specific features. Main results The most relevant hallmark of migraine is that it has common and individual features together. Besides the known clinical manifestations, migraine presentation is heterogeneous with regard to frequency of attacks, presence of aura, response to therapy, associated comorbidities or other symptoms, which likely reflect migraine heterogeneous genetic and molecular basis. The amount of therapies for acute and for prophylactic treatment is really wide, and one of the difficulties is with finding the best treatment for the single patient. In addition to this, patients carry out different daily life activities, and might show lifestyle habits which are not entirely adequate to manage migraine day by day. Education will be more and more important as a strategy of brain health promotion, because this will enable reducing the amount of subjects needing specialty care, thus leaving it to those who require it in reason of refractory condition or presence of comorbidities. Conclusions Recognizing the hallmarks of migraine and the features of single patients enables prescribing specific pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Medical research on headaches today particularly suffers from the syndrome of single-disease approach, but it is important to have a cross-sectional and joint vision with other close specialties, in order to treat our patients with a comprehensive approach that a heterogeneous condition like migraine requires.

This was not the first time in which I coordinated a large effort on the Journal of Headache and Pain. Surely, this was the time in which I enjoyed more ... as the story begins and ends with a wager. 

The wager was to coordinate a complex task, in which the idea was to bring together a set of recognized experts in their respective fields, together with some "future experts", to get to a simple point: creating a "masterpiece" for migraine-related science. But also, creating a ground for a cultural position on the way in which migraine is approached. But also, combining different expertise and experiences, mixing that of recognized scientists and clinicians with that of people who are promising in their fields, the so called future experts. And, in the middle of this, we had to put together all of the knowledgeable about migraine. This could be quite complex, and boring: so, we turned it into a funny activity. And we did it.

Synthesizing a 47-page long paper is almost impossible, but here I wish to provide some ideas on the worth of this work. We decided that the idea behind the term "hallmarks" should not be strict, i.e. the most typical and distinctive sign and symptoms, but large: and we included issues related to personal impact, economic evaluation, workplace impact, pharmacovigilance...so not only a strict scientific and clinical paper, but a cultural one. Although simple, our conclusion on the most relevant hallmark of migraine, was that migraine has common and individual features together. The common ones basically include migraine clinical manifestations, i.e. unilateral location of headache, with pulsating quality, pain of moderate/severe intensity, which is aggravated by physical activity and associated to either nausea, photophobia or phonophobia. Apart from this, migraine is a land of heterogeneity, which likely reflects genetics and molecular bases, as well as the different exposure to environmental factors. All of this determines a variable response to treatments and the need to manage migraine with a multi-modal approach.

However, medical research on headaches particularly suffers from the syndrome of single-disease niche sub-specialties, determining a poor propensity for comparison among different disciplines and areas of intervention, including medical, behavioral and related to prevention in a public health perspective. The output of this monolithic approach is that research results might be brilliant, but yet lack a systematic project articulation. This is evident in the little to no interpretative vision of research findings, resulting in a reduced attractiveness of funding.

This is precisely the cultural value of the hallmarks of migraine paper: presenting an updated view on migraine knowledge with a paramount vision on the persons who suffer from it. Researchers and clinicians with an interest on migraine must have a cross-sectional and joint vision with other niche disease specialties and must stop relegating themselves to the role of fine technicians in the service of an organ or a function.

Presenting this view on migraine was our wager. We did it and we enjoyed while doing it: so enjoy reading as we enjoyed writing.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Go to the profile of Paolo Martelletti
over 1 year ago

A seminal paper to be scattered everywhere in a still jeopardized scientific area. Great leadership of Alberto Raggi in coordinating 40 global authors.

Go to the profile of Alberto Raggi
over 1 year ago

Thank you prof. Martelletti: a great opportunity for me and for a fantastic group of authors!

Go to the profile of Wei Wang
over 1 year ago

Excellent work!

Follow the Topic

Headache
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Neurology > Neurological Disorders > Headache
Migraine
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Neurology > Neurological Disorders > Headache > Migraine
SDG 3: Good Health & Wellbeing
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability > UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) > SDG 3: Good Health & Wellbeing

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Community pharmacy and headache care

In the sustainable development goals (SDG) context of seeking universal health coverage, the expanding gap between the supply of specialized and primary providers of headache-related health care on the one hand and the care needs of the very large number of people affected by headache on the other is a formidable but not insoluble public-health challenge. Structured headache services provide a cost-effective framework for provision of care but may still be overwhelmed by demand. Community pharmacists are an underutilized resource, potentially well able to provide the solution. This collection aligns with UN SDG-3 (Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages), and more specifically with SDG-3.8 (Achieve universal health coverage ..., access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines ... for all). The collection may include reports (especially comparative studies) on current pharmacy practice (scope, responsibilities and regulatory and other restrictions) relevant to headache care in countries worldwide — especially, but not restricted to, low and lower-middle-income countries; studies of pharmacists' knowledge and understanding of headache disorders and their management, theoretically argued proposals for change that, through educational initiatives, expansion of community pharmacists' scope of practice or by other means, might relieve strained headache-care systems; and studies of workload-shifting in headache care from medical to community pharmacy services (economic evaluations, theoretical or empirical assessments of benefits versus harms, and reports of pilot implementations either in headache care or in other therapeutic areas that might be pathfinders for headache care).

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health & Well-Being.

All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: May 01, 2026

Pathophysiology of Pain in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Pain is a debilitating and often under-recognized symptom of neurodegenerative disorders (NDD), including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). One of the interesting and clinically relevant issues is the bidirectional relationship between pain and NDD. In particular, NDD, like chronic pain, which involves not only peripheral but also central mechanisms, is often associated with neuroinflammation, central and peripheral sensitization, and neuronal degeneration. Such chronic pain may worsen the neurodegenerative process, while acute pain may be overlooked in AD and other conditions associated with cognitive decline. The underlying common and disease-specific molecular mechanisms, likely involving changes in neurotransmitters, ion channels, and glial activation, remain largely unknown. It is not entirely clear whether and how the neurodegenerative process may serve as a cause of pain, creating a vicious circle that significantly affects the quality of life of patients. Headaches, and migraine in particular, may have their own specific interactions with NDD. These unanswered questions require research that should deepen our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of such connections, exploring how these discoveries may inspire the development of targeted therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes.

The current Thematic Series “Pathophysiology of Pain in Neurodegenerative Diseases” invites original papers and review articles primarily devoted to understanding pathophysiological mechanisms linking various types of pain, including migraine, headache and other pain syndromes, with neurodegenerative disorders. This series aims to advance our understanding of these complex associations to promote future research for innovative therapeutic strategies.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health and Well-Being.

All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jun 16, 2026