Understanding Wing Dams and Their Role in Flood Risk

Wing dams improve navigation, but their impact on water levels and flood risk has long been debated. By combining detailed 3D and large-scale 1D models, we uncover how different riverbed types shape long-term water level responses to these structures.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

A dynamic river system

Rivers are dynamic systems, continuously shaped by the interplay of flow and sediment transport. Water movement interacts with the riverbed and banks, redistributing sediment, altering channel geometry, and influencing how the river responds to both natural events and human interventions. Understanding these processes is essential for predicting water levels, managing flood risk, and designing sustainable engineering solutions. One practical question arises within this context: do wing dams—structures built to improve navigation—affect flood risk, and if so, how?

Morphological changes induced by wing dams along the dike system, Indian Cave Bend, Missouri River. Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District (as reproduced in [1])

A more complex reality

The Mississippi River provides a striking example. The Great Flood of 1993, which crested at St. Louis at a record 49.58 feet, caused unprecedented damage and raised questions about the role of river engineering structures. Did wing dams contribute to rising water levels, or did they help manage the flood? Similar questions arise along Hungary’s Upper Danube, which is densely lined with wing dams. Here, the riverbed material—gravel and sand versus mostly sand in the Mississippi—responds differently to erosion and deposition, creating a unique set of challenges.

A series of wing dams on the Upper Danube in Hungary, the studied river reach. Source: A. M. Rehák

A collaborative perspective

For my part, I have spent the last 15 years exploring the 3D intricacies of riverbeds through 3D morphodynamic modeling. Gary Parker, in contrast, is a world-renowned expert in large-scale, long-term 1D river modeling. The questions surrounding wing dams in both the Mississippi and the Danube presented an ideal opportunity to combine our complementary skills. By integrating detailed 3D insights with 1D large-scale simulations, we achieved a highly successful contribution that bridged local processes with regional and temporal river behavior.

What we found

Rivers with mixed gravel-sand beds, like the Danube, tend to experience long-term water level increases due to the formation of armored riverbeds behind wing dams. In contrast, rivers with uniform sand beds, like the Mississippi, often show an initial water level rise followed by gradual adjustment as the river reaches a new equilibrium. Even temporary water level changes can last decades, underscoring the slow but persistent nature of morphodynamic adjustment. For the Mississippi, our results suggest that wing dams raise water levels above the original state for roughly 6–8 decades, after which levels may gradually fall below the initial baseline.

Why it matters

This hybrid approach allows scientists and engineers to predict river behavior more reliably, guiding flood risk management, navigation planning, and sustainable river engineering. The study demonstrates that intuition alone is insufficient: understanding localized morphodynamics and how they scale across space and time is essential for designing interventions that safely and effectively interact with river systems.

 

References

[1] J. S. Alexander, R. C. Wilson; W. R. Green: “A Brief History and Summary of the Effects of River Engineering and Dams on the Mississippi River System and Delta”, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, 2012

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Environmental Civil Engineering
Technology and Engineering > Civil Engineering > Environmental Civil Engineering
Geomorphology
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Earth Sciences > Geomorphology
Sedimentology
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Earth Sciences > Sedimentology
Water
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences > Water
Water Policy
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences > Water > Water Policy

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Geology of the Moon

This collection focuses on the Geology of our Moon and new insights we gain from remote sensing data, meteorites and returned samples, and modeling efforts.

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Jan 31, 2026

Drought

In this cross-journal Collection, we highlight studies that investigate the underlying causes and consequences of drought.

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Dec 31, 2025