When a borehole becomes a stress sensor

Can a simple borehole deformation replace costly hydrofracturing tests? Our study shows that ovalization measurements may predict in-situ stresses in soft rocks with surprising accuracy, offering a faster and more affordable alternative for underground engineering.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Critical evaluation of borehole ovalization analysis against hydrofracturing profiles in argillaceous formations - Discover Civil Engineering

This paper introduces and evaluates the effectiveness of borehole ovalization analysis, a methodology designed to predict the natural stress field by examining deformations in vertical boreholes. The reliability of this approach has undergone rigorous testing across multiple boreholes within soft argillaceous formations, revealing several key observations. First, the results obtained demonstrate a notable correlation with hydrofracturing measurements, enhancing the overall credibility of the methodology. Second, the ratio of horizontal to vertical stress (σH/σh) is found to be contingent on the selected value of the breakout angle (θ), introducing a nuanced variable into the predictive framework. This insight emphasizes the importance of considering breakout angle variability in stress field predictions. Finally, the cohesion of the rock mass emerges as a pivotal factor that significantly influences the estimation of the horizontal stress magnitude (σH). This finding underscores the necessity of accounting for rock mass cohesion when applying borehole ovalization analysis for stress field predictions. Additionally, this paper conducts a meticulous comparative analysis by contrasting its results with findings from three hydrofracturing profiles conducted in distinct boreholes. Through this comparative approach, a more comprehensive understanding of the methodology’s strengths and limitations is unveiled, contributing to the ongoing discourse on accurate stress field predictions in subsurface geomechanics.

A simpler way to estimate in-situ stresses underground

Measuring the natural stress field underground is one of the most difficult and expensive tasks in geotechnical engineering. Yet every tunnel, shaft or deep excavation depends on knowing it.

Traditionally, the reference method has been hydraulic fracturing. It is direct and reliable, but also slow, costly, and operationally complex.

Our recent work explores a simpler question:

What if the borehole itself already contains the answer?

Full article:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-024-00036-4

Reading stress from deformation

When stresses concentrate around a drilled hole, the circular section rarely stays circular. The borehole subtly flattens, developing breakouts and an oval shape aligned with the stress field.

This deformation is not random.

Decades of rock mechanics show that:

• elongation develops perpendicular to the minimum horizontal stress
• breakout width reflects stress concentration
• geometry encodes both orientation and magnitude

Instead of forcing the rock to fracture, we can simply measure this geometry.

Using six-arm calipers and televiewer logs, we reconstructed the borehole cross-sections and calculated:

• stress orientation
• σH/σh ratios
• horizontal stress magnitudes

All from shape alone.

Does it really work?

The key test was comparison with hydrofracturing profiles.

Across several argillaceous formations in Spain, the results showed:

• very close agreement in stress orientation
• consistent estimates of stress ratios
• reasonable magnitudes when cohesion is well constrained

In some cases, predicted directions differed by only a few degrees from hydrofrac measurements.

This is important.

Because hydraulic fracturing remains the gold standard, but it is also:

• expensive
• time-consuming
• dependent on fracture-free intervals
• difficult at depth

Ovalization analysis, by contrast, uses logging data already collected in most boreholes.

Where it performs best

The method is not universal.

Our results indicate it works best when:

• boreholes are deep enough for clear breakout development
• rock mass cohesion is known from laboratory tests
• multiple sections are analysed, not single intervals
• high-quality caliper or televiewer tools are used

Under those conditions, the borehole effectively becomes a passive stress sensor.

No injection. No packers. No induced fractures.

Just geometry.

Why this matters for engineering

For tunnels, mines and underground works, stress estimation is often limited by budget and logistics.

A method that is:

• faster
• cheaper
• minimally invasive
• and still reliable

can change practice.

Ovalization analysis will not replace hydrofracturing everywhere. But it can significantly reduce the number of tests required and provide continuous stress information along the borehole.

In many projects, that trade-off is decisive.

A broader perspective

There is also a conceptual lesson.

Sometimes the most useful measurements are already embedded in the system.

Instead of adding complexity, we can learn to interpret what the ground is already telling us.

In this case, a small deviation from circularity becomes a map of the underground stress field.

And a borehole becomes an instrument.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Geotechnical Engineering and Applied Earth Sciences
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Earth Sciences > Geotechnical Engineering and Applied Earth Sciences
Soil and Rock Mechanics
Technology and Engineering > Civil Engineering > Geoengineering > Soil and Rock Mechanics
Technological Infrastructures
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Science and Technology Studies > Science, Technology and Society > Science and Technology Governance > Technological Infrastructures
Natural Hazards
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Earth Sciences > Natural Hazards

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Innovations in Timber Engineering: Advancements in Sustainable Design, Connection Techniques, and Durability

The global timber construction sector is growing due to its sustainability, carbon sequestration, cost-effectiveness, technological advancements like engineered wood, supportive regulations, and market demand for green buildings. In response to these trends, research is focusing on alternative connection techniques and engineered wood products to enhance performance and sustainability. New methods are being developed to reduce reliance on steel and adhesives, aiming to improve reusability and fire resistance of timber structures. Dowel laminated timber (DLT) and timber dowel connections exemplify these innovations, offering promising solutions for modern construction needs.

This Topical Collection invites contributions exploring these emerging fields as well as novel approaches to traditional timber connections and products. It seeks to showcase advancements in engineered wood products and joint systems, highlighting their impact on timber structure design and performance. Additionally, the issue will delve into the durability characterization and modeling of timber products and assemblies, providing a comprehensive overview of current research and future directions. Contributing authors will work alongside the editors to compile a collection of articles that address these themes, offering valuable insights into the evolving landscape of timber engineering.

Keywords: Timber constructions, Sustainability, Connections, Fire resistance, Durability characterization, Dowel laminated timber.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: May 31, 2026

Advances in Construction and Building Material Composites: Emphasizing Life Cycle Assessment and Artificial Intelligence

The Topical Collection (TC) aims at advances happening in the construction and building materials for the development of sustainable composites with particular interest in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Artificial Intelligence (AI). The TC also seeks to highlight the development, assessment, and optimization of composite materials to promote sustainability and resilience in civil engineering. It further includes the aspect of microstructural and phase composition characteristics defining the long-term stability of new composite materials, together with environmental impacts including the leaching of potentially toxic elements and carbon calculations. Overall, the goal is to develop sustainable composite materials using marginal and recycled materials with a special emphasis on using LCA and AI in construction and building materials.

Researchers are encouraged to submit papers that explore a wide range of topics within the field of construction and building materials. Potential areas of interest include, but are not limited to:

● To develop methodologies for the synthesis and design of novel composite materials with emphasis on LCA.

● To contribute to the environmental sustainability of construction and building materials throughout their life cycle.

● To present case studies and applications demonstrating the synergy between LCA and AI in civil engineering.

● Addressing the challenges posed by climate change and proposing material composites solutions that enhance sustainability and resilience with help of advanced tools and technology.

● To foster interdisciplinary research in construction and building materials with AI.

Keywords: Sustainability, construction and building composites; life cycle assessment; microstructural characterization; carbonation process; durability; sustainability; circular economy; Waste management and valorization; characterization of materials and carbon calculations.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 31, 2026