When a borehole becomes a stress sensor
Published in Social Sciences, Earth & Environment, and Civil Engineering
A simpler way to estimate in-situ stresses underground
Measuring the natural stress field underground is one of the most difficult and expensive tasks in geotechnical engineering. Yet every tunnel, shaft or deep excavation depends on knowing it.
Traditionally, the reference method has been hydraulic fracturing. It is direct and reliable, but also slow, costly, and operationally complex.
Our recent work explores a simpler question:
What if the borehole itself already contains the answer?
Full article:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-024-00036-4
Reading stress from deformation
When stresses concentrate around a drilled hole, the circular section rarely stays circular. The borehole subtly flattens, developing breakouts and an oval shape aligned with the stress field.
This deformation is not random.
Decades of rock mechanics show that:
• elongation develops perpendicular to the minimum horizontal stress
• breakout width reflects stress concentration
• geometry encodes both orientation and magnitude
Instead of forcing the rock to fracture, we can simply measure this geometry.
Using six-arm calipers and televiewer logs, we reconstructed the borehole cross-sections and calculated:
• stress orientation
• σH/σh ratios
• horizontal stress magnitudes
All from shape alone.
Does it really work?
The key test was comparison with hydrofracturing profiles.
Across several argillaceous formations in Spain, the results showed:
• very close agreement in stress orientation
• consistent estimates of stress ratios
• reasonable magnitudes when cohesion is well constrained
In some cases, predicted directions differed by only a few degrees from hydrofrac measurements.
This is important.
Because hydraulic fracturing remains the gold standard, but it is also:
• expensive
• time-consuming
• dependent on fracture-free intervals
• difficult at depth
Ovalization analysis, by contrast, uses logging data already collected in most boreholes.
Where it performs best
The method is not universal.
Our results indicate it works best when:
• boreholes are deep enough for clear breakout development
• rock mass cohesion is known from laboratory tests
• multiple sections are analysed, not single intervals
• high-quality caliper or televiewer tools are used
Under those conditions, the borehole effectively becomes a passive stress sensor.
No injection. No packers. No induced fractures.
Just geometry.
Why this matters for engineering
For tunnels, mines and underground works, stress estimation is often limited by budget and logistics.
A method that is:
• faster
• cheaper
• minimally invasive
• and still reliable
can change practice.
Ovalization analysis will not replace hydrofracturing everywhere. But it can significantly reduce the number of tests required and provide continuous stress information along the borehole.
In many projects, that trade-off is decisive.
A broader perspective
There is also a conceptual lesson.
Sometimes the most useful measurements are already embedded in the system.
Instead of adding complexity, we can learn to interpret what the ground is already telling us.
In this case, a small deviation from circularity becomes a map of the underground stress field.
And a borehole becomes an instrument.
Follow the Topic
-
Discover Civil Engineering
This is a fully open access, peer-reviewed journal that supports multidisciplinary research and policy developments across the field of civil engineering.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Waste-Based and Sustainable Concrete Materials: Performance and Structural Applications
The construction industry is under increasing pressure to reduce its environmental impact while maintaining the safety, durability, and performance of civil infrastructure. In this context, waste-based and sustainable concrete materials have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional concrete through the incorporation of recycled aggregates, industrial by-products, agricultural wastes, supplementary cementitious materials, and other environmentally friendly constituents.
This Topical Collection aims to provide a focused platform for recent advances in the development, characterization, and application of waste-based and sustainable concrete materials. Particular emphasis is placed on material design, mechanical properties, durability performance, microstructural behavior, structural response, and practical applications in sustainable construction.
The Collection welcomes original research articles and review papers addressing experimental investigations, numerical modeling, performance assessment, durability evaluation, life-cycle considerations, and structural applications of sustainable concrete materials. Topics may include, but are not limited to, recycled aggregate concrete, waste ceramic concrete, fiber-reinforced sustainable concrete, geopolymer and alkali-activated materials, supplementary cementitious materials, low-carbon binders, durability under aggressive environments, structural strengthening, and performance-based design of sustainable concrete elements.
By bringing together contributions from researchers worldwide, this Collection seeks to advance knowledge on environmentally responsible and high-performance concrete technologies and to support the development of resilient, durable, and sustainable civil infrastructure.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 9, and SDG 11.
Keywords: Sustainable Concrete, Fiber-Reinforced Concrete, Waste Materials, Recycled Aggregates, Cementitious Composites, Durability, Mechanical Performance, Structural Applications, Sustainable Construction, Advanced Concrete Materials
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Apr 30, 2027
Reinventing Materials and Methods: Geopolymers, 3D Printing, and Modular Building Systems for a Sustainable Future
The global green building market is rapidly growing, driven by innovations such as smart building systems, renewable energy integration, and eco-friendly materials, all of which address universal challenges in reducing buildings' environmental impact and operational costs. The proposed Collection "Green Building Solutions: Materials and Technologies for a Sustainable Future" focuses on innovative sustainable building materials and technologies that significantly reduce the environmental impact of construction.
Among the materials, geopolymers stand out as a promising eco-friendly alternative to traditional cement, offering up to 80% lower CO2 emissions and enhanced durability by utilizing industrial by-products like fly ash. On the technology side, 3D printing and modular construction enable faster, more precise, and less wasteful building processes, supporting efficient resource use and design flexibility. Integral to these solutions is the concept of the circular economy, which promotes recycling, reuse, and minimizing waste throughout the building lifecycle, thereby fostering a truly sustainable construction industry.
The purpose of this collection is to compile a range of interdisciplinary research and case studies that highlight the potential of geopolymers, 3D printing, and modular building systems in achieving sustainable construction outcomes.
Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
- Geopolymer Applications in Sustainable Construction
- Innovations in 3D Printing for Building Design
- Modular Construction Techniques for Efficiency
- Low-Carbon Building Strategies
- Circular Economy in Construction Practices
- Innovative Practices in Deconstruction - Up-cycling of Building Materials
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to: SDG 11.
Keywords: green building, sustainable construction, circular economy, eco-friendly material
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Oct 31, 2026
