When Less is More (Dangerous): How Centrosome Loss Drives Chromosomal Instability?

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

For decades, cancer researchers have looked at tumor cells and observed too many centrosomes.

In 1914, the German cytologist Theodor Boveri hypothesized that centrosome aberrations could contribute to human cancer. Indeed, centrosome defects, especially amplification (the production of supernumerary centrosomes) are present in a broad array of solid and hematopoietic human cancers. They correlate with advanced tumor grade and poor clinical outcomes. At present, centrosome amplification is recognized as an emerging hallmark of cancer cells, known to drive multipolar spindle formation and tumor aggression.

But is the opposite scenario - having fewer or no centrosomes - equally dangerous?

One of the most frequent questions we were asked when presenting our study that explores the impact of centrosome loss is: If a cell is missing this critical organelle, can it still divide? The answer is yes. Cells do not simply stop dividing; instead, they divide and make mistakes when doing so. Loss of the centrosomes forces a cell to rely on “Plan B”, an acentrosomal spindle assembly pathway prone to errors, leading to chromosome segregation defects that cause a massive chaos to the cell's genome. In most healthy cells, centrosome loss results in robust cell cycle arrest within a few divisions via a pathway that requires p53 – the famous guardian of the genome. However, there are "evaders". These rare cells escape cell cycle arrest and, instead, potentially evolve into aggressive malignancies.

Connecting the Organelle to the Disease

Prostate cancer differs from many other malignancies. It harbors few point mutations in oncogenic driver genes and instead shows extensive structural variations and gene fusions induced by rearrangements – a cancer hallmark known as chromosomal instability (CIN). The consequences of centrosome loss have long piqued our lab's interest. In a previous study published in Oncogene (2019), our colleague Dr. Mengdie Wang first discovered centrosome loss in human primary prostate cancer tissue. This phenomenon was more prevalent than expected and correlated with tumor grade. In subsequent in vitro and in vivo models, we isolated clones that had experienced transient centrosome loss. These cells not only survived the process but, as a result, some were also transformed. This led us to ask - what are the genomic alterations that transformed these cells?

From Chaos to Signatures

To understand the molecular alterations underlying centrosome loss-induced tumorigenicity, we initiated our current study. We performed whole-genome sequencing on our cell and tumor models. The data confirmed that cells resulting from transient centrosome loss displayed extensive CIN. Using the CIN genome generated from our experimental model, we analyzed large cohorts of prostate cancer patient samples. We identified recurrent genomic alterations in patient samples that clustered closely with our transient centrosome loss models. Furthermore, by integrating genomic classification with transcriptomic data, we identified a signature of 9 CIN-associated genes, which we termed CIN9. This transcriptomic signature represents either a cause or a consequence of cells evading from checkpoints and surviving the resulting genomic chaos from centrosome loss.

The "Hopeful Monster"

Our experimental model was designed to cause a burst of genomic crises by transiently removing centrosomes in cultured cells, similar to that observed in prostate cancer. Interestingly, our model produced a clone that continued to display CIN, eventually giving rise to a tumorigenic subclone that aggressively formed xenograft tumors in mice within just three weeks. Our findings suggest that a cell with CIN acts like the evolutionary "hopeful monster", an organism with profound ability to fit an environment perfectly and sweep the population. Understanding these CIN-associated features may help us differentiate between benign and aggressive tumors and eventually lead to precision treatment strategies.

Continuous questions about centrosome loss in cancer

Centrosome loss appears to be a primary cause of CIN in prostate cancer. But what leads to the loss of centrosomes in the epithelial cells of prostate glands in the first place? That is the next question we intend to answer.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Prostate Cancer
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Cancer Biology > Cancers > Urological Cancer > Prostate Cancer
Genomic Instability
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Genetics and Genomics > Molecular Genetics > Genomic Instability
Centrosome
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Cell Biology > Cytoskeleton > Centrosome

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

TME-Driven Metastasis and Adaptive Phenotypes

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a dynamic and multifaceted ecosystem that shapes nearly every aspect of cancer progression, from early tumor evolution to metastatic spread and therapeutic response. Dynamic interactions between tumor cells, stromal components, immune infiltrates, and extracellular matrix structures not only cell migration and invasion but also broader adaptive phenotypes such as metabolic rewiring, immune escape, therapy resistance, and phenotypic plasticity. Recent advances in single-cell omics, live-cell imaging, spatial transcriptomics, and functional modeling systems (e.g. organoids, organ-on-chip) have illuminated how bidirectional communication within the TME governs these behaviors.

This collection invites cutting-edge research and comprehensive reviews that dissect the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which the TME drives tumor dissemination and adaptive cancer cell states. We welcome interdisciplinary contributions spanning molecular oncology, immunology, systems biology, and bioengineering, with an emphasis on translational insights that inform therapeutic targeting of TME-driven and immune-regulatory pathways in cancer.

Topics of Interest

  • Molecular mechanisms of tumor cell migration and invasion
  • Crosstalk between tumor cells, fibroblasts, and immune cells in the TME
  • Role of cytokines, chemokines, and extracellular vesicles in cell migration
  • Immunomodulatory effects of the TME on metastatic potential
  • ECM remodeling and mechanotransduction in cancer cell motility
  • Computational and imaging approaches to study cell migration in vivo
  • Targeting migration-associated signaling (e.g., EMT, integrins, PI3K, Rho GTPases)
  • Interplay between immune checkpoint pathways and migratory signaling
  • Tumor-derived exosomes and their role in pre-metastatic niche formation
  • Translational strategies for inhibiting TME-driven metastasis

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 27, 2026