We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website. You can decide for yourself which categories you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available.
Further information can be found in our privacy policy.
Recent Comments
The quality of a review processes depends mostly on the competence of the reviewer/referee. Few competent people bother to find the time to be a reviewer. The net result is that the referee are often of limited experience of knowledge, which translate in reviews that are either too superficial/sloppy, or too picky on useless points. My best experience: writing the review for Nature Astronomy and having the editor contributing with his expertise to the draft.