Behind the Paper: Confronting Transphobia as a Public Health Crisis in the UK

This article identifies transphobia in the United Kingdom as a public health crisis, linking systemic discrimination to severe health disparities among trans, non-binary, and gender diverse people, and calls for urgent, inclusive, and coordinated public health action.
Behind the Paper: Confronting Transphobia as a Public Health Crisis in the UK
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Transphobia in the United Kingdom: a public health crisis - International Journal for Equity in Health

The moral panic surrounding trans, non-binary, and gender diverse (TGD) lives in the United Kingdom (UK) has been incited by high-level political and government actors and exacerbated by pervasive misinformation in social and press media. This hostile environment contributes to increasing interpersonal violence and social exclusion experienced by TGD people. Structural and interpersonal discrimination—conceptualised as minority stress—is understood to elicit physiological and psychological stress responses that predispose TGD individuals to a range of adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, and risk behaviours such as alcohol use. Health disparities among TGD people in the UK are driven by a combination of minority stress, barriers to general healthcare, and disadvantage across multiple social determinants of health. Limited access to gender-affirming healthcare compounds these disparities, contributing to stark differences in morbidity and mortality relative to cisgender populations. Preventive healthcare engagement is also disproportionately low among TGD individuals, further exacerbating long-term health risks. The intersection of social exclusion, policy-driven discrimination, and systemic healthcare inequities places TGD people at significant and potentially increasing risk of poor health outcomes. The health disparities faced by TGD people in the UK constitute a real-time public health crisis that demands urgent and sustained intervention. TGD people must be central to shaping the strategic direction of a coordinated and adequately resourced response to these harms.

Background

In recent years, the United Kingdom (UK) has witnessed an alarming surge in transphobic policy and discourse. As clinician-researchers, public health practitioners, and grassroots activists, we felt compelled to respond to what we increasingly recognised as a real-time public health crisis. Our article, “Transphobia in the United Kingdom: a public health crisis,” is a call to action informed by a synthesis of the mounting evidence that trans, non-binary, and gender diverse (TGD) people in the UK are experiencing increasing disparities in healthcare access and health outcomes related to their marginalisation.

Transphobia as a multi-level threat

We approached the issue through a socio-ecological lens, identifying three nested systems of transphobic hostility:

  • Macrosystem: National policies and legal decisions that restrict TGD rights, such as the UK Government’s unprecedented action to block Scotland’s Gender Recognition Reform Bill, and the 2025 Supreme Court ruling which mischaracterises “sex” as a binary and immutable characteristic
  • Mesosystem: Press and social media environments amplify misinformation and dehumanising narratives about TGD individuals
  • Microsystem: Interpersonal discrimination and violence, including a 200% rise in police-reported transphobic hate crimes since 2018.

These layers interact to create a hostile environment that marginalises TGD people, compromising their physical and mental health.

The Health Consequences of Transphobia

Our review of the literature and national data highlights stark and persistent health inequalities. TGD people in the UK face significant barriers to both general and gender-affirming healthcare, alongside increased rates of morbidity across a range of conditions and elevated mortality. They are also more likely to engage in health-related behaviours that carry risk, such as substance use. These disparities are not random—they are the foreseeable outcomes of structural inequities across the wider determinants of health, compounded by exposure to stigma. Minority stress frameworks help explain these patterns, linking stigma to poorer health via chronic psychological and physiological stress responses to discrimination.

One of the most alarming findings we highlight is the inadequacy of access to gender-affirming care. Waiting times for adult gender identity clinics now exceed four years, with a system that lacks the capacity for the UK TGD population. Recent policy changes have prohibited access to puberty blockers and restricted access to hormone therapy for young people. Coroner reports have linked lack of access to gender-affirming care with suicides among young TGD people.

Moreover, TGD people are often erased from health research and routine clinical data collection, making it difficult to fully understand or address the scope of these disparities. This erasure is both a symptom and a driver of systemic neglect.

What needs to change

We argue that addressing this crisis requires a coordinated, multi-sectoral response. Our recommendations include:

  • Advocacy: Public health professionals must speak out against transphobic policies and support inclusive legislation
  • Workplace Protections: Employers, especially in the public sector, should implement policies that affirm and protect TGD staff
  • Research Reform: Funders and institutions must prioritise TGD health research and ensure inclusive data practices
  • Community Investment: Public health teams should partner with LGBTQ+ organisations to co-produce services and interventions
  • Education: Anti-trans stigma must be addressed through evidence-based educational initiatives, including in healthcare training
  • Policy Change: The Equality Act should be amended to better protect TGD people, and the Gender Recognition Act should be demedicalised and expanded to include non-binary identities.

Looking Ahead

We hope this paper will serve as a resource for policymakers, clinicians, researchers, and advocates who are committed to health equity. Most importantly, we hope it affirms the experiences of TGD people and underscores the urgency of action.

The health and human rights of TGD people and all minoritised communities are a collective responsibility. We must act now.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Medical Education
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Professional and Vocational Education > Medical Education
Clinical Medicine
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine
Clinical Research
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Biomedical Research > Clinical Research
Public Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health
Human Rights
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Socio-Legal Studies > Human Rights
Politics and Human Rights
Humanities and Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies > Political Science > Politics and Human Rights

Your space to connect: The Primary immunodeficiency disorders Hub

A new Communities’ space to connect, collaborate, and explore research on Clinical Medicine, Immunology, and Diseases!

Continue reading announcement

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Racism and Health

The ongoing advancement of our understanding of how racism impacts health - both directly and structurally - is crucial for addressing the deep-rooted health inequities that persist globally. Structural racism shapes health outcomes among racialized populations, contributing to inequities in healthcare access and quality, and impacting social, political, or environmental determinants of health. Existing research also connects direct and visible manifestations of racism, such as major and everyday discrimination, to negative health outcomes. At the same time, racism does not operate in isolation. A growing body of research shows how it intersects with other systems of oppression—such as classism and patriarchy—and with broader social determinants of health, producing compounded and context-specific inequities. An intersectional lens is therefore essential to understand how overlapping structures of power and exclusion shape health and healthcare experiences. These insights are essential in conducting rigorous and thorough health research, guiding anti-racist health policy, and ultimately, ensuring equitable health for all.

Looking forward, research holds the potential to develop new methodologies and indices and unveil complexities in how racism manifests within healthcare systems and societal structures. By deepening our collective understanding, we can develop more effective interventions that target the root causes of health inequities.

We invite researchers to contribute to this special Collection on Racism and Health, focusing on advancing our understanding and addressing health inequities. Topics of interest include but are not limited to:

- Racism as a structural determinant of health

- Racism as a direct determinant of health

- Racialized health outcomes in different populations

- Intersectionality and inequities in health, healthcare access and quality

- Nexuses between social, political, and environmental determinants of health and systemic discrimination

- Anti-racist health policy frameworks and systems

- Impact of racism on mental health

- Health inequities in reproductive, maternal, and child health

- Obstetric and reproductive violence

- Community-based interventions for equitable health

- Decolonizing health research and global health epistemologies

We strongly encourage contributions from racialized scholars and authors with lived experience or expertise in addressing systemic discrimination in health research.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 10, Reduced Inequalities.

All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Aug 14, 2026

Migration and its effects on maternal and child health and nutrition

International Journal for Equity in Health is hosting a cross-journal Collection in collaboration with the Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition.

This cross-journal Collection is seeking contributions showcasing research on the intersection of migration and maternal and child health and nutrition. Both forced and voluntary migration have become a global phenomenon with profound implications for mothers' and children’s health, nutrition, and overall well-being. This special edition will highlight diverse methodological approaches, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies, that contribute to a deeper understanding of health inequities among migrant populations and offer potential solutions to mitigate them.

This special issue aims to bridge gaps in the evidence base and promote research incorporating diverse disciplinary perspectives and methodological synergies. We welcome theoretical, review, and empirical contributions that enhance our understanding of the complex social, political, economic, and cultural determinants shaping the health of migrant women and children. In addition to the mentioned methodologies, several others can be incorporated to strengthen this research. Participatory and community-based methods, such as participatory action research (PAR), involve affected communities in all stages of the research process, ensuring relevance and applicability. Qualitative and ethnographic approaches, including in-depth interviews and focus groups, provide a deeper understanding of the cultural and social contexts influencing health. Longitudinal studies track health outcomes over time, offering insights into the long-term effects of migration. An intersectional approach considers how multiple identity factors intersect and affect health. Social network analysis explores the role of social connections in accessing healthcare and resources. Policy analysis methods assess how national and international policies impact migrant health, while big data and spatial analysis reveal trends across different regions and contexts. We encourage submissions that engage with affected communities, apply innovative methodological frameworks, and inform policy and practice.

Submissions may include, but are not limited to, the following areas:

Health disparities in migrant populations:

- Examining health inequities affecting migrant mothers and children.

- Identifying key determinants of health disparities in various migration contexts.

Nutritional challenges and interventions:

- Assessing the nutritional status of migrant mothers and children.

- Evaluating policies, interventions, and strategies aimed at addressing nutritional challenges among migrant populations.

Impact of migration policies:

- Analyzing how migration policies influence maternal and child health outcomes.

- Investigating the role of legal frameworks in shaping access to healthcare and nutrition for migrant populations.

Psychosocial well-being:

- Exploring the psychosocial effects of migration on maternal and child health.

- Assessing the role of social support systems in mitigating mental health challenges.

Community health and resilience:

- Investigating community-based approaches to improve the health and resilience of migrant populations.

- Understanding the role of cultural adaptation and integration in health outcomes.

Health systems and access to care:

- Examining how health systems address the needs of migrant mothers and children.

-Identifying innovative approaches to enhance healthcare accessibility and equity for migrant populations.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 5, Gender Equality.

This collection is open for submissions from all authors on the condition that the manuscript falls within both the scope of the collection and the journal it is submitted to.

All submissions in this collection undergo the relevant journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief of the relevant journal. As an open access publication, participating journals levy an article processing fee (International Journal for Equity in Health, Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief of the journal where the article is being submitted.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jan 30, 2026