China’s popular language input system and neurodevelopment of reading

Explore how children’s literacy learning has become susceptible to the usage of electronic devices in our new article "Children’s neurodevelopment of reading is affected by China’s language input system in the information era" published by npj Science of Learning | 2 min read

Published in Neuroscience

China’s popular language input system and neurodevelopment of reading
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

What was the main aim of your research?

Our team is interested in exploring how children’s literacy learning has become susceptible to frequent typewriting due to the popularization of electronic devices and learning platforms. The main aim of our study was to investigate whether children’s neurodevelopment of reading is affected by China’s language input system in the information era.

Why did you decide to investigate this?

The rise of digital technology has changed the traditional mode of communication and learning. Children are encouraged to read through digital learning platforms and required to learn typewriting skills. Chinese reading acquisition demands intensive visuo-orthographic and visuo-spatial processing of Chinese characters. Yet, the most popular input method used in China—the pinyin method, is pronunciation-based and does not require appropriate orthographic information to generate characters. This study raises concerns about the costs of children’s reliance on digital technology.

What were the key findings from the study? 

Our study has demonstrated that intermediate Chinese readers (age 9-11) with more time (spending > 15 minutes each day) on pinyin typing had lower scores in character and word reading tests than those with less time (spending < 15 minutes each day) on pinyin typing. More frequent usage of pinyin typing and digital devices was associated with overall weaker cortical activations, weaker functional connections, and less gray matter volume within the reading cortical network as compared with less frequent usage of pinyin typing.

The brain activations in reading comprehension for more frequent pinyin typing users, less frequent pinyin typing users, and their difference.

What does this mean?

Our results suggest that the frequent usage of the pinyin input method affects Chinese children’s reading development. Chinese children are facing literacy challenges in the digital age. To preserve visuo-orthographic encoding of Chinese characters, we would recommend to restrict the use of pinyin input, and promote orthography-based input methods including handwriting.

What is the future for the field?

We believe that the usage of e-devices can enrich the learning environment but the strengths and weaknesses should be carefully examined to optimize its role in learning to read. In future, we hope to examine the effect of the handwriting-based input method on reading and its application to reading and writing intervention.

https://www.nature.com/article...

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Neuroscience
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Neuroscience

Your space to connect: The Psychedelics Hub

A new Communities’ space to connect, collaborate, and explore research on Psychotherapy, Clinical Psychology, and Neuroscience!

Continue reading announcement

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Effects of lifestyle behaviours on learning and neuroplasticity

This collection invites research on health psychology, sports science, public health, neuroscience, physical activity and physical education across the lifespan.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 09, 2026

Reimagining Teaching and Learning in the Age of Generative AI Agents

This Collection explores how LLM-powered AI agents transform teaching, learning, and feedback, reshaping educational practices and roles.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jul 13, 2026