Continuous glucose monitoring

In type 1 diabetes, as well as insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, frequent blood glucose monitoring is needed to adjust insulin dosage, to detect imminent or current hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia and to achieve glycemic targets, preventing short and long-term complications (1).
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) emerges as a technology with the potential to provide patients, providers and health care professionals valuable information to achieve a better glycemic control while reducing the disease burden.

CGM devices measure interstitial glucose every 5 to 15 minutes, which highly correlates with blood glucose. They also provide information about trends in blood glucose levels and alert users for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. They consist of a glucose sensor placed under the skin, an adherent transmitter over it and a data receiver (either a portable device receiver or a smart phone or smart watch) (1, 2).

CGM provides real-time information about glucose control, allowing individuals to make timely decisions, understand glucose trends and fluctuations and adjust more precisely insulin dosing. It also helps to reduce hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia risks by providing early warnings when glucose levels are dropping or increasing. These benefits and the reduced need to frequent fingerstick tests, help to improve patients’ quality of life and reduce the burden of diabetes management.

There are three main types of CGM devices: real-time CGM, intermittently scanned CGM with and without alarms, and professional CGM (1-3).

Real-time CGM devices measure and store glucose levels continuously and without prompting. They also provide alarms to notify the user that glucose level is approaching or is in the hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic range, as well as arrows that show whether glucose is stable, increasing or decreasing quickly or very quickly.

Intermittently scanned CGM, sometimes called “flash glucose monitors”, measure glucose levels continuously but require scanning for their storage. The second generation of these devices also have alerts for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Professional CGM are placed at the healthcare provider’s office and worn for a period, usually 7 to 14 days. Glucose levels may be blinded or visible for the patient. After this period, the patient returns to the health care office to download and analyze the data.

The use of these devices should always be coupled with patient’s education to adjust medication and change lifestyle behaviors.

CGM devices may be a part of the closed-loop insulin delivery systems, also referred to as the “artificial pancreas”. In these systems, insulin delivery can automatically be adjusted based on CGM data, further improving glucose control (4, 5).

CGM devices costs and concerns related to accuracy and reliability of measurements are some issues that may emerge as barriers to its use. However, CGM technology is in continuous evolution and efforts are being made by the researchers to improve sensor accuracy and to integrate the system with other diabetes management tools (1-3).

The consensus report of ADA and EASD recommended that glycemic control included, in addition with HbA1c, time in range assessment (a CGM-derived indicator) (6, 7). Noteworthy, the use of CGM in diabetic patients at high cardiovascular risk is promising and needs further evaluation according to the Delphi consensus published in Cardiovascular Diabetology (8).

Continuous glucose monitoring technology has revolutionized diabetes management by providing real-time data, glucose trends and hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia alerts, reducing the need to frequent fingerstick tests. These advantages, coupled with education and adequate follow-up, improve glycemic outcomes, reduce the disease burden and significantly improve the quality of life of people with diabetes.

References 

  1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice C. 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(Suppl 1):S97-S112.
  2. Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, et al. Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(10):e151-e99.
  3. Simonson GD, Bergenstal RM, Johnson ML, et al. Effect of Professional CGM (pCGM) on Glucose Management in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Primary Care. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021;15(3):539-45.
  4. Templer S. Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Systems: Past, Present, and Future Directions. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:919942.
  5. Åm, M.K., Teigen, I.A., Riaz, M. et al. The artificial pancreas: two alternative approaches to achieve a fully closed-loop system with optimal glucose control. J Endocrinol Invest. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-023-02193-2
  6. Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2022;65(12):1925-1966.
  7. El-Sayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, et al. 6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(Suppl 1):S97-S110.
  8. Di Mario C, Genovese S, Lanza GA, et al. Role of continuous glucose monitoring in diabetic patients at high cardiovascular risk: an expert-based multidisciplinary Delphi consensus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):164.

 

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Clinical Medicine
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine

Your space to connect: The Primary immunodeficiency disorders Hub

A new Communities’ space to connect, collaborate, and explore research on Clinical Medicine, Immunology, and Diseases!

Continue reading announcement

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Organoids as emerging models in diabetes and cardiovascular research

Organoids—three-dimensional structures derived from stem cells—are transforming biomedical research by modeling key aspects of human physiology and disease. By replicating native tissue architecture, cellular heterogeneity, and functional behavior, they provide human-relevant systems that address limitations inherent to conventional in-vitro and animal models.

Diabetes and cardiovascular disease are deeply interconnected conditions, characterized by shared, multi-organ pathophysiology. Organoid technologies offer unique opportunities to dissect disease mechanisms, evaluate therapeutic strategies, and develop personalized, physiologically relevant models. These systems enable the investigation of cardiometabolic processes in platforms that better reflect the complexity and progression of human disease.

Cardiovascular Diabetology welcomes original research articles, reviews, and meta-analyses for this Collection, which aims to highlight the use of organoid technologies in advancing our understanding of cardiovascular complications associated with diabetes.

Areas of interest include, but are not limited to:

- Organoid models of diabetic cardiomyopathy and heart failure

- Matrigel alternatives for organoid development

- Cell-cell and extracellular matrix interactions in organoids

- Organoid-based drug testing for cardiovascular diseases

- Organoid-on-chip systems for tissue crosstalk and perfusion3D bioprinting and tissue engineering for cardiovascular organoids

- Artificial intelligence–driven analysis of organoid function and phenotypes

- Organoid models of gestational diabetes–induced congenital heart disease

- Functional genomics using CRISPR in cardiovascular organoids

- Single-cell and spatial omics to map disease states in organoids

- Co-culture systems of vascular and pancreatic organoids to study metabolic-vascular crosstalk

- Organoid-based screening platforms for anti-diabetic and cardioprotective drugs

Submissions that contribute to conceptual clarity (e.g., distinctions between organoids and spheroids), incorporate multi-organ or metabolic system perspectives, or connect technological development with clinical or translational insights are especially welcome.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health and Well-Being.

All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Apr 07, 2026

Cardiometabolic and Hepatic Interconnections: From Mechanisms to Clinical Implications

Cardiometabolic and liver diseases are no longer viewed as isolated entities. Growing evidence shows that hepatic and cardiovascular dysfunctions are tightly interconnected through shared metabolic, inflammatory, hemodynamic, and hormonal pathways. This crosstalk shapes disease trajectories and opens opportunities for integrated diagnostics and therapies.

Key interconnections include:

- Insulin resistance. The liver is pivotal for glucose and lipid homeostasis. Hepatic insulin resistance drives excess glucose production and dyslipidemia, contributing to the cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic (CKM) syndrome.

- Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Highly prevalent in obesity and metabolic syndrome, and especially common in type 2 diabetes (T2D), which bears the highest MASLD burden. Progression to steatohepatitis or fibrosis markedly increases atherosclerotic risk.

- Liver-derived factors. Hepatokines (e.g., FGF21) and extracellular vesicles influence cardiac tissue, vascular tone, and systemic metabolism, potentially amplifying inflammation, oxidative stress, and lipotoxicity across organs.

- Systemic inflammation and lipotoxicity. Visceral adipose tissue and the liver release inflammatory cytokines and triglyceride-rich lipids, promoting endothelial dysfunction and perpetuating metabolic disturbances.

- Dyslipidemia. Elevated triglycerides and LDL, with reduced HDL, accelerate atherogenesis and cardiovascular risk.

- Hemodynamic and metabolic stress. Heart failure can cause hepatic congestion and hypoperfusion, while advanced liver disease can precipitate cirrhotic cardiomyopathy and arrhythmias, even in the absence of prior heart failure.

In summary, hepatic and cardiometabolic systems are functionally and pathologically intertwined: liver dysfunction worsens cardiovascular and metabolic health, and cardiometabolic disturbances accelerate hepatic pathology.

This Collection welcomes original research articles, reviews, and meta-analyses focused on this reciprocal relationship. Given the high prevalence of MASLD in T2D, we especially encourage submissions at the T2D–MASLD–cardiovascular interface. Addressing hepatic and cardiometabolic health in parallel is essential for effective risk reduction and patient care.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health and Well-Being.

All submissions in this Collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jul 15, 2026