Environmental sustainability analysis of biofuels: a critical review of LCA studies

This paper critically analyzes the various environmental impacts of biofuel production from several feedstocks as first, second and third generation biofuels.
Environmental sustainability analysis of biofuels: a critical review of LCA studies
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Environmental sustainability analysis of biofuels: a critical review of LCA studies - Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

The use of fossil fuels in the transportation sector has significantly increased the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, leading to concerns about their environmental impact. As a result, biofuels have been promoted as a promising alternative to fossil fuels to mitigate GHG emissions. However, while biofuels are considered a low-carbon solution, there are concerns that its widespread use could have unforeseen environmental effects. This study analyzes the intricacies involved in biofuel’s life cycle assessment (LCA). Fifty-three peer-reviewed studies were examined, covering a broad range of biofuels produced from over 25 different feedstocks. The literature review focused mainly on research published from 2012 to 2022 to avoid outdated information. The study found that second-generation biofuels have a greater potential for reducing GHG emissions than first-generation biofuels. However, the GHG emissions from third-generation biofuels are higher than those from conventional fuel, ranging from 10.2 to 1910 g CO2 eq. / MJ. The net energy ratio for biofuels ranges from 1.23 to 12.49 for first-generation, 0.003 to 15.04 for second-generation, and 3 to 18.5 for third-generation biofuels. The analysis also shows that the water footprint of biofuels is 50–240 times greater than fossil fuels. The study also examines the critical methodological aspects and sources of uncertainty in the LCA of biofuels and suggests solutions to address these problems. Overall, the study highlights the importance of taking a comprehensive approach when assessing the environmental impact of biofuels and the need for continued research to develop sustainable and effective biofuels. Graphical abstract

The use of fossil fuels in the transportation sector has significantly increased the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, leading to concerns about their environmental impact. As a result, biofuels have been promoted as a promising alternative to fossil fuels to mitigate GHG emissions. However, while biofuels are considered a low-carbon solution, there are concerns that its widespread use could have unforeseen environmental effects. This study analyzes the intricacies involved in biofuel’s life cycle assessment (LCA). Fifty-three peer-reviewed studies were examined, covering a broad range of biofuels produced from over 25 different feedstocks. The literature review focused mainly on research published from 2012 to 2022 to avoid outdated information. The study found that second-generation biofuels have a greater potential for reducing GHG emissions than first-generation biofuels. However, the GHG emissions from third-generation biofuels are higher than those from conventional fuel, ranging from 10.2 to 1910 g CO2 eq. / MJ. The net energy ratio for biofuels ranges from 1.23 to 12.49 for first-generation, 0.003 to 15.04 for second-generation, and 3 to 18.5 for third-generation biofuels. The analysis also shows that the water footprint of biofuels is 50–240 times greater than fossil fuels. The study also examines the critical methodological aspects and sources of uncertainty in the LCA of biofuels and suggests solutions to address these problems. Overall, the study highlights the importance of taking a comprehensive approach when assessing the environmental impact of biofuels and the need for continued research to develop sustainable and effective biofuels.

The study shows that second-generation biofuels have a greater potential for reducing GHG emissions than first-generation biofuels. However, the GHG emission from third-generation biofuels exceeds emissions from conventional fuel due to the high electricity consumption in biofuel production. The novelty of the work lies in the critical review of LCA studies and in exploring the critical methodological features and sources of uncertainty in biofuel LCA. This study also contributes to the sustainable development goals by evaluating the GHG emissions and net energy ratio of biofuel production.

 

 The estimated GHG emission of first-generation bioethanol ranges from 0.006 to 167 g CO2 eq. / MJ, and that for biodiesel varies from -7.3 to 329 g CO2 eq. When the average values are taken into account, the GWP of most of the first-generation biofuels is less than those of conventional gasoline (72.8 to 96 g CO2 eq. / MJ). The GHG emissions of second-generation biofuels vary from -15.4 to 178.7 g CO2 eq. / MJ for bioethanol and – 0.21 to 113.8 g CO2 eq. / MJ for biodiesel

 

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Sustainability
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability
Environmental Civil Engineering
Technology and Engineering > Civil Engineering > Environmental Civil Engineering
Biofuels
Physical Sciences > Chemistry > Organic Chemistry > Green Chemistry > Biofuels

Related Collections

With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Science, Engineering and Digital Transformation for Sustainability

This Special Issue is for selected papers from the 2025 American Institute of Chemical Engineers’ International Sustainability Science, Engineering (ICOSSE) conference and the associated United States National Science Foundation workshop on Al and Digital Transformation for Advanced Research and Education of Industrial and Environmental Sustainability, that was held in Auckland, New Zealand, February 20-22, 2025.

This invitation-only, special issue will further explore the forefronts of decarbonization, digital transformation including AI and digitalization for sustainability, renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, green chemistry, and circular economy solutions, that were discussed at the conference by global leaders, innovators, and visionaries who are shaping the future of sustainability science, engineering, and digital transformation.

Topics that will be covered include the following:

• Waste Treatment and Circular Economy

• Renewable and Sustainable Energy

• Decarbonization

• Indigenous Sustainability Practices and Worldview

• Sustainable Water and Wastewater Management

• Digital Transformation, Digitalisation and AI for Sustainability

• Sustainable Food and Agriculture

• Sustainable Healthcare Practices

• Green Chemistry and Sustainable Materials

• Clean Tech Entrepreneurship

• Sustainable Construction and Infrastructure

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Sep 01, 2025

Decarbonization Technologies and Circular Economy Models for a Regenerative Future

The global sustainability landscape is evolving rapidly, moving beyond the traditional pursuit of net-zero carbon emissions toward regenerative models that actively restore ecosystems, reduce atmospheric carbon, and promote circular economic resilience. The transition from “net-zero” to a “regenerative future” acknowledges the urgency of scaling up carbon-negative technologies, optimizing material loops, and fostering system-wide transformation.

This Special Issue seeks to bring together cutting-edge research, emerging technologies, and policy models that enable deep decarbonization through both technological innovation and circular economy principles. We aim to spotlight interdisciplinary and applied contributions that help define the next frontier of climate action, particularly through technologies such as Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), Direct Air Capture (DAC), biochar applications, sustainable nanotechnology, carbon-storing materials, industrial symbiosis, and waste valorization.

In parallel, circular economy models rooted in the principles of reduce, reuse, recycle, and regenerate play a crucial role in rethinking value chains, minimizing resource extraction, and enabling low-carbon development. This special issue will explore the integration of these models with emerging decarbonization technologies to offer scalable, holistic, and economically viable solutions.

We welcome original research articles, reviews, case studies, and perspectives in the following (but not limited to) areas:

• Carbon-negative technologies: BECCS, DAC, mineralization, enhanced weathering, biochar applications

• Decarbonization of energy systems: renewable energy integration, hydrogen economy, energy storage innovations

• Circular economy innovations: waste-to-resource technologies, industrial symbiosis, circular supply chains

• Carbon-storing materials: sustainable construction materials, carbon-absorbing composites

• Digital and AI-driven tools for circularity and carbon accounting

• Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) of emerging decarbonization solutions

• Policy and governance frameworks supporting regenerative models

• Case studies of circular transition in cities, industries, and regions

• Role of nanotechnology and advanced materials in decarbonization and circularity

• Sustainable agriculture and land-use strategies for carbon drawdown

• Financing and business models for regenerative technologies

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Mar 10, 2026