Integrating generative AI into STEM education: enhancing conceptual understanding, addressing misconceptions, and assessing student acceptance

We are pleased to share our recent publication, which investigates the potential of a generative AI tool—specifically ChatGPT—to improve conceptual understanding, address common misconceptions, and foster student engagement, particularly in resource-constrained STEM classrooms.
Integrating generative AI into STEM education: enhancing conceptual understanding, addressing misconceptions, and assessing student acceptance
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerOpen
SpringerOpen SpringerOpen

Integrating generative AI into STEM education: enhancing conceptual understanding, addressing misconceptions, and assessing student acceptance - Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research

Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI models such as ChatGPT, offer transformative opportunities to enhance educational practices in STEM disciplines. Thermodynamics, a fundamental subject in engineering education, presents significant challenges due to its abstract nature and common misconceptions. This study investigates the effectiveness of integrating ChatGPT as a supplemental pedagogical tool, guided by a constructivist inquiry-based approach using the Constructivist Inquiry-Based Learning Prompting (CILP) framework, to enhance conceptual understanding and address misconceptions in an introductory thermodynamics course for first-year Moroccan engineering students. A quasi-experimental design was used, with 120 students equally divided into control and experimental groups. The control group received traditional instruction, whereas the experimental group received ChatGPT-assisted instruction. Conceptual understanding was measured using pre- and post-tests, while student perceptions and acceptance were collected via weekly surveys. Results showed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group, exhibiting greater improvements in conceptual understanding and a reduction in qualitative misconceptions, particularly related to entropy and internal energy. However, some quantitative misconceptions persisted, underscoring ChatGPT’s limitations in advanced reasoning tasks, problem-solving, and numerical calculations. Students reported high satisfaction with ChatGPT’s usability and instructional support. Moreover, targeted use of ChatGPT, rather than frequent reliance, correlated with optimal learning outcomes. These findings underscore ChatGPT’s potential to enhance STEM education within inquiry-based, constructivist learning environments and provide evidence for the effective integration of generative AI tools to improve learning outcomes, particularly in resource-constrained settings.

Why This Research Was Conducted?

Thermodynamics presents persistent challenges for students due to its abstract concepts and common misconceptions. Traditional teaching methods often fall short in effectively addressing these difficulties. With the emergence of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, we identified a promising opportunity to enhance instruction through real-time, personalized support. This study investigates whether integrating ChatGPT within a constructivist inquiry-based framework can improve students’ conceptual understanding of thermodynamic principles, reduce misconceptions, and foster greater acceptance of AI-assisted learning in STEM classrooms.

What did we find?

✅ Greater Conceptual Understanding: The experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in post-test scores, demonstrating improved understanding of core thermodynamic concepts—particularly entropy and internal energy.

✅ Reduction in Qualitative Misconceptions: Students receiving ChatGPT-assisted instruction showed a clear decline in conceptual errors, especially in qualitative reasoning tasks.

✅ Positive Student Perceptions: Participants reported high satisfaction with ChatGPT’s usability and instructional support, reinforcing its value as a pedagogical tool.

⚠️ Limitations in Quantitative Reasoning: Some quantitative misconceptions remained unresolved, highlighting ChatGPT’s current limitations in advanced problem-solving and numerical calculations.

📊 Strategic Use Was Most Effective: Students who engaged with ChatGPT in a targeted and purposeful way—rather than relying on it excessively—achieved the most substantial learning gains.   

Read and download the full paper here:

https://diser.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43031-025-00125-z

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in