The deeply appalling condition of the Great Barrier Reef

Deeper sections of coral reefs have been suggested to potentially offer a refuge against thermal anomalies and mass coral bleaching caused by global ocean warming. Here, Frade et al. investigate temperature profiles and bleaching impacts across depth on the northern Great Barrier Reef to conclude that this thermal refuge capacity of deep reefs may be limited.
Published in Ecology & Evolution
The deeply appalling condition of the Great Barrier Reef

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the shortened URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

The paper in Nature Communications is here:

Deep reefs of the Great Barrier Reef offer limited thermal refuge during mass coral bleaching.

It was May 2016, the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) was experiencing what would later be described as the worst ever mass coral bleaching event in its recorded history. Our team was getting together in Cairns, north Queensland, arriving from various parts of Australia to go assess the yet unknown impacts of the mass bleaching event to the deeper sections of the northern GBR.

The bleaching survey team (in wetsuits) and support crew (in white shirts) aboard the MV Ethereal, utilizing ship time generously offered by the Joy Foundation, providing a means to access the remote northern sections of the Great Barrier Reef. © Shannon Joy

On the shallow reef, the mass bleaching of the late austral summer of 2015/2016 would reportedly cause the death of about 30% of all corals across the whole GBR, with most of this impact located in the northern GBR. However, information on bleaching impacts to mesophotic depths (i.e., below 30 m of depth) was so far non-existing for the GBR, despite the hypothesised role of the deep reef as potential thermal refuge for coral species threatened in the severely affected shallow reef.

Staghorn corals just recently killed by the mass bleaching start to get covered by a thick layer of filamentous algae. © Pedro Frade

We felt a mix of anxiety for the potentially devastating scenario we would be facing underwater in the next couple of weeks, as well as a sense of mission, as it had been a long and strenuous month of preparation for some of us, and there was no room for failure in the very tight sampling schedule we had planned.

Pim Bongaerts (left) and Norbert Englebert (right) with all the equipment used throughout the surveys, aboard the boat of Mike Ball Dive Expeditions, a tour operator who supported us in completing surveys around the Ribbon Reefs. © Pedro Frade

In fact, preparations for this trip started 3.5 years earlier, when Pim Bongaerts and Norbert Englebert (and the rest of their team) established a range of monitoring sites as part of the XL Catlin Seaview Survey. Shallow and deep permanent monitoring plots were established at 8 different locations, to start assessing how trajectories of deep reef communities vary from those in the shallow. Temperature loggers were originally deployed from 10 m all the way down to 100 m depth, using a remotely operated vehicle (ROV). Given that the loggers could not be secured to the reef, they were mounted in PVC cylinders with sealed dive-weights and several floats on a short rope to allow the ROV to deploy and retrieve the loggers. The data from the 10 m and 40 m loggers were now crucial, as they could help explain the bleaching patterns we were set to find during our trip.

David Whillas controlling the ROV and deploying one of the temperature loggers on the deep reef (top). A basket deployed at 40 m depth to hold any of the samples and temperature loggers retrieved by the ROV (bottom left), and two temperature loggers deployed by the ROV at 100 m depth showing the floats compressed at depth (bottom right). © Norbert Englebert

When the first opportunity came to plunge down and check out the deep areas of the reef, we were all astounded…

Pim Bongaerts plunges down on our first visit to the mesophotic reef during the mass coral bleaching event of 2015/2016. © Pedro Frade

… we all expected to see some bleaching at depth, but no one was actually ready to see that widespread effect of the bleaching, so severe and impressive, even down at 40 m depth. More than half of all coral colonies were bright white, and many had already died, basically by starvation, as bleaching in fact corresponds to the loss (from the coral) of photosynthetic microalgae which in normal situations cover most nutritional needs of the coral. It was quite sad to see at first-hand the devastating effects of that warm water mass that sat over the northern GBR, a thermal anomaly caused by our globally warming climate.

Pedro Frade running bleaching survey transects across a reef slope severely impacted by the bleaching. © Pim Bongaerts

And even more appalling was to realise that those corals in the deep were not really protected from the effects of this thermal anomaly, and that even at depths of 40 m the temperature rose to unforeseen absolute maxima of 30.2-30.4 °C across the different locations, only slightly milder than the 30.6-30.7 °C registered at 10 m depth, for instance. Our research showed that deep reefs, often considered to offer refuge for thermal anomalies, may only have a limited ability to do so.

A severely bleached colony of the coral Pachyseris speciosa might still recover if the thermal stress subsides soon enough. © Pim Bongaerts

After the work was done, we went home with a deep sense of frustration from witnessing such a devastating scenario, and feeling so powerless not being able to do anything to ameliorate the bleaching effects. It was overwhelming to experience the spatial magnitude of this bleaching event, sailing for hundreds of kilometres between reefs and seeing the same damage again and again. Nonetheless, the study provided important new findings that once again highlight that we, as a global community, need to make some drastic changes if we want to preserve our coral reefs into the future.

The team responsible for the bleaching field surveys. From left to right: Pim Bongaerts, Pedro Frade, Norbert Englebert and Manual Gonzalez-Rivero. © Pedro Frade

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in