The Energy Footprint of Land Grabs

Large-scale land acquisitions for commercial agriculture and cash crops have been rising at an alarming rate worldwide. Our research considers the hidden energy consumption and carbon impact of this "great agrarian transition."
Published in Sustainability
The Energy Footprint of Land Grabs

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the shortened URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

The ongoing agrarian transition from small-holder farming to large-scale commercial agriculture is reshaping systems of production and human well-being in many regions. A fundamental part of this global transition is manifested in large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs) by agribusinesses. Its energy implications, however, remain poorly understood. In our paper for Nature Communications, we assess the multi-dimensional changes in fossil-fuel-based energy demand resulting from this agrarian transition. We focus on LSLAs by comparing two scenarios of low-input and high-input agricultural practices, exemplifying systems of production in place before and after the agrarian transition. A shift to high-input crop production requires industrial fertilizer application, mechanization of farming practices and irrigation, which increases by ~5 times fossil-fuel-based energy consumption compared to low-input agriculture. Given the high energy and carbon footprints of LSLAs and concerns over local energy access, our analysis highlights the need for an approach that prioritizes local resource access and incorporates energy-intensity analyses in land use governance.

This research is part of a broader project that brought together scholars interested in an integrative inquiry into the way such "land grabs" in developing countries are impacting various environmental indicators. Our team was assembled under the auspices of the U.S. National Science Foundation's Socioecological Synthesis Center (SESYNC) through a collaboration led by Paolo D'Odorico and Jampel Dell'Angelo. We used the Land Matrix dataset as a key resource for this project. This compendium is an independent crowdsourced global land monitoring initiative with several global and regional partners. The data has allowed for a panoramic analysis of what is being termed the 21st century's "Great Agrarian Transition." An earlier paper from the same project focused on local food security and dietary diversity.  Remote sensing, and household survey data (available in 11 sub-Saharan African countries) with georeferenced information on 160 land acquisitions in 39 countries were used in this study. The results pointed to a paradox where land deals simultaneously contribute to closing the global yield gap by increasing crop production, while threatening local food security by redirecting key dietary nutrients toward the export market. 

Both these studies point to the importance of considering the "food energy water nexus" in charting international development policies involving commercial land acquisitions. Furthermore, the energy imprint of these land acquisitions provides us with a direct linkage to the carbon accounting and climate change implications of such deals. Many of the major LSLAs will utilize ammonia produced from the energy-intensive Haber-Bosch process. Moreover, after farmers apply synthetic fertilizers to crops, chemical reactions lead to the formation and emission of nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas with 265 times more global warming potential than carbon dioxide. Over the considered LSLAs, we estimate that synthetic fertilizer application in high-input farming would release 1.3 million tons CO2-equivalent per year, with a GHG intensity of 0.3 tons CO2-equivalent per year hectare. However, less carbon-intensive options to industrial fertilizers are available, such as using recycled organic matter, nutrients recovered from wastewater-treatment plants or manure, a more efficient application of fertilizers. A systems science approach to calculating the costs and benefits of land deals, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa would lead to more accurate forecasts of social and ecological sustainability of such transactions. 

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Subscribe to the Topic

Research Communities > Community > Sustainability

Related Collections

With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Materials and devices for separation, sensing, and protection

In this Collection, the editors of Nature Communications and Communications Materials welcome the submission of primary research articles that highlight the development and application of functional materials in the areas of separation, sensing, and protection.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jun 30, 2024

Applied Sciences

This collection highlights research and commentary in applied science. The range of topics is large, spanning all scientific disciplines, with the unifying factor being the goal to turn scientific knowledge into positive benefits for society.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Ongoing