The Impact of Educational Experiences on Brain Development: Insights from Montessori and Traditional Schooling

Paola Zanchi & Solange Denervaud -- This study reveals that experience impacts brain dynamics: how children learn at school is partially mirrored in their brain activity.
Published in Neuroscience and Education
The Impact of Educational Experiences on Brain Development: Insights from Montessori and Traditional Schooling
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

How we learn shapes our minds. While traditional schools often prioritize memorization and standardized tests, alternative approaches like Montessori emphasize exploration and self-directed learning. To understand how these different learning environments impact brain development, this study used advanced imaging techniques to investigate the brain network dynamics of Montessori and traditionally schooled students aged 4 to 18.

Previous studies comparing Montessori and traditional pedagogy showed differences in academic (e.g., Lopata et al., 2005), cognitive (e.g., Lillard & Else-Quest, 2006) , and social-emotional outcomes (e.g., Denervaud et al., 2019; Denervaud, Knebel, et al., 2020), with Montessori-schooled students performing most of the time better and demonstrating improved social skills (e.g., Ervin et al., 2010). These quantitative behavioral studies have been complemented by recent work examining differences in brain activity (e.g., Denervaud et al., 2019) and functional connectivity (e.g., Denervaud, Fornari, et al., 2020; Duval et al., 2023), suggesting distinct learning strategies. For example, during a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) math task, Montessori-schooled students demonstrated higher simultaneous activity in brain regions associated with problem-solving, suggesting functional connectivity development for process-oriented learning strategies. In contrast, traditionally schooled students exhibited more simultaneous activity in brain regions linked to memory when answering math questions correctly, suggesting functional connectivity development for outcome-oriented learning strategies (Denervaud, Fornari, et al., 2020). These findings underscore the importance of investigating differences in children experiencing different school pedagogies, especially how their brain networks dynamically develop.

The human brain is a complex network of interconnected regions constantly communicating (Park & Friston, 2013). These connections, known as functional networks, are not static and adapt and reconfigure in response to experiences and learning (Bola & Sabel, 2015). New research tools like the "spatiotemporal connectome" allow us to analyze brain activity over time. This method involves breaking down neural activity into time windows, calculating connectivity matrices within each window, and then representing these matrices as connected components (CCs) over time and space. It allows the capture of dynamic brain patterns by tracking changes in connections between brain regions (Griffa et al., 2017). By quantifying these patterns, we can assess the brain's ability to integrate information from different functional systems (System Diversity) and the stability of brain activity patterns over time (Spatiotemporal Diversity), then compare these values between groups. For example, a recent comparative study between children and adults reported functional reorganization of brain spatiotemporal dynamics over time. When the brain matures, it becomes functionally more integrative (increased global System Diversity) and gains stability within neural systems (decreased global Spatiotemporal Diversity) (Vohryzek et al., 2020). Paralleling experience-dependent plasticity, we wondered how children’s neural dynamics would be shaped by experience at school.

Using these measures, the current study further investigated whether schooling experiences (Montessori vs. traditional) modulate brain network dynamics differently, adopting a cross-sectional perspective. We examined the spatiotemporal brain network dynamics of 87 students from Montessori and high-quality traditional schools, using resting-state fMRI and diffusion-weighted imaging to capture both functional and structural brain connectivity.

The results revealed that students from Montessori schools demonstrated greater functional integration (increased System Diversity) and neural stability (decreased Spatiotemporal Diversity) at the whole brain level compared to students from traditional schools. Higher neural stability was evident globally and within specific networks associated with motor control, attention, sensory processing, and executive functions (cerebellar, ventral, and dorsal attention, somatomotor, and frontoparietal networks), and greater functional integration was observed in the cerebellar network.

The results suggest that Montessori-schooled students have an enhanced capacity for managing and integrating diverse information and that their brains operate more stably and consistently over time. Potential explanations for these findings include the Montessori classroom's emphasis on student autonomy for uninterrupted working hours, which may foster stronger neural connections related to self-motivation and exploration. Additionally, Montessori education encourages trial-and-error learning, which may stimulate neural plasticity and adaptation. The collaborative learning environments in Montessori schools also promote the development of communication and social networking skills, reflected in more robust neural connectivity in relevant brain regions.

These findings reveal that distinct educational approaches significantly influence brain development. Montessori education, characterized by student-centered learning and exploration, fosters greater brain network integration and stability than traditional methods. These neural differences underscore the importance of considering how different educational approaches can support optimal brain development, offering valuable insights for parents and educators. By understanding how learning experiences shape the brain, we can create school environments that promote intellectual and social growth in parallel, creativity, and a strong foundation for lifelong learning.


 

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Alternative Education
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Alternative Education
Pedagogy
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Pedagogy
Cognitive Neuroscience
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Neuroscience > Cognitive Neuroscience